Comparison of lattice QCD+QED predictions for radiative leptonic decays of light mesons with experimental data

R. Frezzotti, M. Garofalo, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, N. Tantalo
{"title":"Comparison of lattice \nQCD+QED\n predictions for radiative leptonic decays of light mesons with experimental data","authors":"R. Frezzotti, M. Garofalo, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, C. Sachrajda, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, N. Tantalo","doi":"10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.053005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a comparison of existing experimental data for the radiative leptonic decays $P\\to\\ell\\nu_\\ell\\gamma$, where $P=K$ or $\\pi$ and $\\ell=e$ or $\\mu$, from the KLOE, PIBETA, E787, ISTRA+ and OKA collaborations with theoretical predictions based on the recent non-perturbative determinations of the structure-dependent vector and axial-vector form factors, $F_V$ and $F_A$ respectively. These were obtained using lattice QCD+QED simulations at order $O(\\alpha_{\\mathrm{em}})$ in the electromagnetic coupling. We find good agreement with the KLOE data on $K\\to e\\nu_e\\gamma$ decays from which the form factor $F^+=F_V+F_A$ can be determined. For $K\\to\\mu\\nu_\\mu\\gamma$ decays we observe differences of up to 3 - 4 standard deviations at large photon energies between the theoretical predictions and the data from the E787, ISTRA+ and OKA experiments and similar discrepancies in some kinematical regions with the PIBETA experiment on radiative pion decays. A global study of all the kaon-decay data within the Standard Model results in a poor fit, largely because at large photon energies the KLOE and E787 data cannot be reproduced simultaneously in terms of the same form factor $F^+$. The discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental values of the form factor $F^-=F_V-F_A$ is even more pronounced. These observations motivate future improvements of both the theoretical and experimental determinations of the structure-dependent form factors $F^+$ and $F^-$, as well as further theoretical investigations of models of \"new physics\" which might for example, include possible flavor changing interactions beyond $V - A$ and/or non-universal corrections to the lepton couplings.","PeriodicalId":8457,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVD.103.053005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

We present a comparison of existing experimental data for the radiative leptonic decays $P\to\ell\nu_\ell\gamma$, where $P=K$ or $\pi$ and $\ell=e$ or $\mu$, from the KLOE, PIBETA, E787, ISTRA+ and OKA collaborations with theoretical predictions based on the recent non-perturbative determinations of the structure-dependent vector and axial-vector form factors, $F_V$ and $F_A$ respectively. These were obtained using lattice QCD+QED simulations at order $O(\alpha_{\mathrm{em}})$ in the electromagnetic coupling. We find good agreement with the KLOE data on $K\to e\nu_e\gamma$ decays from which the form factor $F^+=F_V+F_A$ can be determined. For $K\to\mu\nu_\mu\gamma$ decays we observe differences of up to 3 - 4 standard deviations at large photon energies between the theoretical predictions and the data from the E787, ISTRA+ and OKA experiments and similar discrepancies in some kinematical regions with the PIBETA experiment on radiative pion decays. A global study of all the kaon-decay data within the Standard Model results in a poor fit, largely because at large photon energies the KLOE and E787 data cannot be reproduced simultaneously in terms of the same form factor $F^+$. The discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental values of the form factor $F^-=F_V-F_A$ is even more pronounced. These observations motivate future improvements of both the theoretical and experimental determinations of the structure-dependent form factors $F^+$ and $F^-$, as well as further theoretical investigations of models of "new physics" which might for example, include possible flavor changing interactions beyond $V - A$ and/or non-universal corrections to the lepton couplings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晶格QCD+QED对光介子辐射轻子衰变的预测与实验数据的比较
我们提出了辐射轻子衰变$P\to\ell\nu_\ell\gamma$的现有实验数据的比较,其中$P=K$或$\pi$和$\ell=e$或$\mu$,分别来自KLOE, PIBETA, E787, ISTRA+和OKA合作,与基于最近结构依赖矢量和轴向矢量形式因子($F_V$和$F_A$)的非微扰确定的理论预测。这些都是通过在$O(\alpha_{\mathrm{em}})$阶的点阵QCD+QED模拟得到的。我们发现与$K\to e\nu_e\gamma$衰变的KLOE数据非常吻合,可以从中确定形状因子$F^+=F_V+F_A$。对于$K\to\mu\nu_\mu\gamma$衰变,我们观察到在大光子能量下,理论预测与E787、ISTRA+和OKA实验的数据之间存在3 - 4个标准差的差异,并且在一些运动学区域与PIBETA实验的辐射介子衰变存在类似的差异。对标准模型中所有的介子衰变数据进行的一项全球研究得出了一个很差的拟合结果,主要是因为在大光子能量下,KLOE和E787数据不能以相同的形式因子同时再现$F^+$。外形系数$F^-=F_V-F_A$的理论值和实验值之间的差异更加明显。这些观察激发了未来对结构依赖形状因子$F^+$和$F^-$的理论和实验确定的改进,以及对“新物理”模型的进一步理论研究,例如,可能包括可能的风味变化相互作用,超出$V - A$和/或对轻子耦合的非普遍修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Logarithmic Contributions to the Polarized and Operator Matrix Elements in Deeply Inelastic Scattering Fast flavor instabilities and the search for neutrino angular crossings Chiral susceptibility in a dense thermomagnetic QCD medium within the hard thermal loop approximation On the radiation of an arbitrary moving permanent magnetic moment Higgs alignment and the top quark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1