Model predictive control switching strategy for safe small satellite cluster formation flight

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Aerospace Systems Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s42401-023-00237-2
Tyson Smith, John Akagi, Greg Droge
{"title":"Model predictive control switching strategy for safe small satellite cluster formation flight","authors":"Tyson Smith,&nbsp;John Akagi,&nbsp;Greg Droge","doi":"10.1007/s42401-023-00237-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents the development and analysis of a spacecraft formation flying architecture. The desired state of each spacecraft is maintained using a model predictive control-based control framework that is based on the Hill–Clohessy–Wiltshire equations and a polytope boundary constraint as a switching surface. This framework can be used to maintain the desired cluster formation while also guaranteeing internal cluster flight. The polytope boundaries are designed, such that no two agents have overlapping regions, allowing the vehicles to execute avoidance strategies without continually maintaining the trajectories of other agents. The model predictive control framework combined with the convex polytope boundary enables a scalable method that can support clusters of satellites to coordinate to safely achieve mission objectives while minimizing fuel usage. As part of the implementation of this control scheme, the authors created two spacecraft formation flying control approaches. The first approach uses fewer, large maneuvers to control a spacecraft to the center of a keep-in-volume. The second approach allows the spacecraft to perform many small maneuvers to stay just inside the boundary of the keep-in-volume. This paper compares the fuel cost savings of these two approaches. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that the first approach produces the lower total fuel usage, but if a lower amount of fuel per maneuver is required, then the second approach should be used. This work also compares the computation requirements and fuel usage for <span>\\(\\hbox {L}_1\\)</span>, <span>\\(\\hbox {L}_2\\)</span>, and <span>\\(\\hbox {L}_\\infty \\)</span> norms formulations of the framework, the <span>\\(\\hbox {L}_1\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\hbox {L}_2\\)</span> norms require the least amount of fuel usage, while the <span>\\(\\hbox {L}_2\\)</span> requires the least amount of computation time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36309,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42401-023-00237-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the development and analysis of a spacecraft formation flying architecture. The desired state of each spacecraft is maintained using a model predictive control-based control framework that is based on the Hill–Clohessy–Wiltshire equations and a polytope boundary constraint as a switching surface. This framework can be used to maintain the desired cluster formation while also guaranteeing internal cluster flight. The polytope boundaries are designed, such that no two agents have overlapping regions, allowing the vehicles to execute avoidance strategies without continually maintaining the trajectories of other agents. The model predictive control framework combined with the convex polytope boundary enables a scalable method that can support clusters of satellites to coordinate to safely achieve mission objectives while minimizing fuel usage. As part of the implementation of this control scheme, the authors created two spacecraft formation flying control approaches. The first approach uses fewer, large maneuvers to control a spacecraft to the center of a keep-in-volume. The second approach allows the spacecraft to perform many small maneuvers to stay just inside the boundary of the keep-in-volume. This paper compares the fuel cost savings of these two approaches. The results presented in this paper demonstrate that the first approach produces the lower total fuel usage, but if a lower amount of fuel per maneuver is required, then the second approach should be used. This work also compares the computation requirements and fuel usage for \(\hbox {L}_1\), \(\hbox {L}_2\), and \(\hbox {L}_\infty \) norms formulations of the framework, the \(\hbox {L}_1\) and \(\hbox {L}_2\) norms require the least amount of fuel usage, while the \(\hbox {L}_2\) requires the least amount of computation time.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小卫星编队安全飞行模型预测控制切换策略
本文介绍了一种航天器编队飞行结构的研制与分析。使用基于Hill-Clohessy-Wiltshire方程和多面体边界约束作为切换面的模型预测控制框架来维持每个航天器的期望状态。这个框架可以用来维持期望的集群形成,同时也保证内部集群飞行。设计了多面体边界,使得没有两个智能体有重叠的区域,允许车辆在不持续保持其他智能体轨迹的情况下执行规避策略。模型预测控制框架与凸多面体边界相结合,实现了一种可扩展的方法,可以支持卫星集群协调,安全实现任务目标,同时最大限度地减少燃料使用。作为该控制方案实施的一部分,作者创建了两种航天器编队飞行控制方法。第一种方法使用更少、更大的机动来控制航天器到保持体积的中心。第二种方法允许航天器执行许多小的机动,以保持在保持体积的边界内。本文比较了这两种方法节约的燃料成本。本文的结果表明,第一种方法产生较低的总燃料使用量,但如果每次机动所需的燃料量较低,则应使用第二种方法。本工作还比较了框架的\(\hbox {L}_1\)、\(\hbox {L}_2\)和\(\hbox {L}_\infty \)三种规范公式的计算需求和燃料使用情况,\(\hbox {L}_1\)和\(\hbox {L}_2\)规范需要最少的燃料使用,\(\hbox {L}_2\)规范需要最少的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace Systems
Aerospace Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Aerospace Systems provides an international, peer-reviewed forum which focuses on system-level research and development regarding aeronautics and astronautics. The journal emphasizes the unique role and increasing importance of informatics on aerospace. It fills a gap in current publishing coverage from outer space vehicles to atmospheric vehicles by highlighting interdisciplinary science, technology and engineering. Potential topics include, but are not limited to: Trans-space vehicle systems design and integration Air vehicle systems Space vehicle systems Near-space vehicle systems Aerospace robotics and unmanned system Communication, navigation and surveillance Aerodynamics and aircraft design Dynamics and control Aerospace propulsion Avionics system Opto-electronic system Air traffic management Earth observation Deep space exploration Bionic micro-aircraft/spacecraft Intelligent sensing and Information fusion
期刊最新文献
Trajectory prediction for fighter aircraft ground collision avoidance based on the model predictive control technique Initial gap modeling for wing assembly analysis A survey on synthetic jets as active flow control Deconvolution of mode composition beamforming for rotating source localization Computational study on effect of free-stream turbulence on bio-inspired corrugated airfoil at different sections at low Reynolds number
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1