Bounding 2d functions by products of 1d functions

Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1002/malq.202000008
François Dorais, Dan Hathaway
{"title":"Bounding 2d functions by products of 1d functions","authors":"François Dorais,&nbsp;Dan Hathaway","doi":"10.1002/malq.202000008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given sets <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$X,Y$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and a regular cardinal μ, let <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Φ</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Phi (X,Y,\\mu )$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> be the statement that for any function <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mo>:</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$f : X \\times Y \\rightarrow \\mu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, there are functions <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>:</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$g_1 : X \\rightarrow \\mu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>:</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n <mo>→</mo>\n <mi>μ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$g_2 : Y \\rightarrow \\mu$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> such that for all <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>y</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mi>X</mi>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mi>Y</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$(x,y) \\in X \\times Y$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>y</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <mi>max</mi>\n <mo>{</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>g</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>y</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <mo>}</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$f(x,y) \\le \\max \\lbrace g_1(x), g_2(y) \\rbrace$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. In <math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>ZFC</mi>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZFC}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, the statement <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Φ</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\Phi (\\omega _1, \\omega _1, \\omega )$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is false. However, we show the theory <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mtext>“the</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>club</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>filter</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>on</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>is</mtext>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mtext>normal”</mtext>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>Φ</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}+ \\text{``the club filter on $\\omega _1$ is normal''} + \\Phi (\\omega _1, \\omega _1, \\omega )$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (which is implied by <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>ZF</mi>\n <mo>+</mo>\n <mi>DC</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathsf {ZF}+ \\mathsf {DC}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>+ “<math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>V</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$V = L(\\mathbb {R})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>” + “ω<sub>1</sub> is measurable”) implies that for every <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>α</mi>\n <mo>&lt;</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\alpha &lt; \\omega _1$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> there is a <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>κ</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>α</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\kappa \\in (\\alpha ,\\omega _1)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> such that in some inner model, κ is measurable with Mitchell order <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≥</mo>\n <mi>α</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ge \\alpha$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202000008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Given sets X , Y $X,Y$ and a regular cardinal μ, let Φ ( X , Y , μ ) $\Phi (X,Y,\mu )$ be the statement that for any function f : X × Y μ $f : X \times Y \rightarrow \mu$ , there are functions g 1 : X μ $g_1 : X \rightarrow \mu$ and g 2 : Y μ $g_2 : Y \rightarrow \mu$ such that for all ( x , y ) X × Y $(x,y) \in X \times Y$ , f ( x , y ) max { g 1 ( x ) , g 2 ( y ) } $f(x,y) \le \max \lbrace g_1(x), g_2(y) \rbrace$ . In ZFC $\mathsf {ZFC}$ , the statement Φ ( ω 1 , ω 1 , ω ) $\Phi (\omega _1, \omega _1, \omega )$ is false. However, we show the theory ZF + “the club filter on ω 1 is normal” + Φ ( ω 1 , ω 1 , ω ) $\mathsf {ZF}+ \text{``the club filter on $\omega _1$ is normal''} + \Phi (\omega _1, \omega _1, \omega )$ (which is implied by ZF + DC $\mathsf {ZF}+ \mathsf {DC}$ + “ V = L ( R ) $V = L(\mathbb {R})$ ” + “ω1 is measurable”) implies that for every α < ω 1 $\alpha < \omega _1$ there is a κ ( α , ω 1 ) $\kappa \in (\alpha ,\omega _1)$ such that in some inner model, κ is measurable with Mitchell order α $\ge \alpha$ .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
二维函数的边界是一维函数的乘积
给定集合X, Y $X,Y$和正则基数μ,令Φ (X, Y,μ) $\Phi (X,Y,\mu )$对于任意函数f:X × Y→μ $f : X \times Y \rightarrow \mu$,有函数g1:X→μ $g_1 : X \rightarrow \mu$和g2:Y→μ $g_2 : Y \rightarrow \mu$使得对于所有(x, Y)∈x × Y $(x,y) \in X \times Y$,F (x, y)≤{Max g1 (x),g2 (y)}$f(x,y) \le \max \lbrace g_1(x), g_2(y) \rbrace$。在ZFC $\mathsf {ZFC}$中,语句Φ (ω 1, ω 1, ω) $\Phi (\omega _1, \omega _1, \omega )$为假。然而,我们展示了理论ZF +“ω 1上的俱乐部滤波器是正常的”+ Φ (ω 1 ω 1,ω) $\mathsf {ZF}+ \text{``the club filter on $\omega _1 $ is normal''} + \Phi (\omega _1, \omega _1, \omega )$(由ZF + DC $\mathsf {ZF}+ \mathsf {DC}$ +“V = L (R) $V = L(\mathbb {R})$隐含“+”ω1是可测量的”)意味着对于每一个α &lt;ω 1 $\alpha < \omega _1$存在一个κ∈(α, ω 1) $\kappa \in (\alpha ,\omega _1)$,使得在某个内部模型中,κ可测,Mitchell阶≥α $\ge \alpha$。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1