QE in the euro area: Has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds?

A. Belke, D. Gros
{"title":"QE in the euro area: Has the PSPP benefited peripheral bonds?","authors":"A. Belke, D. Gros","doi":"10.4419/86788931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The asset purchase programme of the euro area, active between 2015 and 2018, constitutes an interesting special case of Quantitative Easing (QE) because the ECB's Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) involved the purchase of peripheral euro area government bonds, which were clearly not riskless. Moreover, these purchases were undertaken by national central banks at their own risk. Intuition suggests, and a simple model confirms, that, ceteris paribus, large purchases by a national central bank of the bonds of their own sovereign should increase the risk for the remaining private bond holders. This might seem incompatible with the observation that risk spreads on peripheral bonds fell when QE in the euro area was announced. However, the initial fall in risk premiums may have been due to expectations of the bond purchases proving effective in lowering risk-free rates. When these expectations were disappointed, risk premiums returned to their initial level. Formal statistical tests confirm that indeed risk premiums on peripheral bonds did not follow a random walk (contrary to what is assumed in event studies). Nor did the announcements of bond buying change the stochastics of these premiums. There is thus no reason to consider the impact effect to have been permanent.","PeriodicalId":16244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money","volume":"179 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4419/86788931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The asset purchase programme of the euro area, active between 2015 and 2018, constitutes an interesting special case of Quantitative Easing (QE) because the ECB's Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) involved the purchase of peripheral euro area government bonds, which were clearly not riskless. Moreover, these purchases were undertaken by national central banks at their own risk. Intuition suggests, and a simple model confirms, that, ceteris paribus, large purchases by a national central bank of the bonds of their own sovereign should increase the risk for the remaining private bond holders. This might seem incompatible with the observation that risk spreads on peripheral bonds fell when QE in the euro area was announced. However, the initial fall in risk premiums may have been due to expectations of the bond purchases proving effective in lowering risk-free rates. When these expectations were disappointed, risk premiums returned to their initial level. Formal statistical tests confirm that indeed risk premiums on peripheral bonds did not follow a random walk (contrary to what is assumed in event studies). Nor did the announcements of bond buying change the stochastics of these premiums. There is thus no reason to consider the impact effect to have been permanent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧元区的量化宽松:PSPP对外围国家债券有利吗?
2015年至2018年间活跃的欧元区资产购买计划构成了量化宽松(QE)的一个有趣的特例,因为欧洲央行的公共部门购买计划(PSPP)涉及购买欧元区外围国家的政府债券,而这些债券显然不是没有风险的。此外,这些购买是由各国央行自行承担风险进行的。直觉表明(一个简单的模型也证实了这一点),在其他条件不变的情况下,一国央行大举购买本国主权债券,应该会增加剩余私人债券持有者的风险。这似乎与欧元区宣布量化宽松后外围国家债券风险息差下降的观察结果不相符。然而,最初风险溢价的下降可能是由于预期债券购买将有效降低无风险利率。当这些预期落空时,风险溢价就会回到初始水平。正式的统计检验证实,外围国家债券的风险溢价确实不遵循随机游走(与事件研究的假设相反)。购买债券的声明也没有改变这些溢价的随机性。因此,没有理由认为撞击的影响是永久性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial earthquakes and aftershocks: From Brexit to Russia-Ukraine conflict and the stability of European banks Escape from pollution: Mass media, air quality, and management turnover International tests of the ZCAPM asset pricing model Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on price Co-movements in China The role of non-critical business and telework propensity in international stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1