Healthier workplace promotion: medical check-ups for hospital workers

I. Mikačić, Maja Pipić, Sanja Ljubičić, P. Pekić
{"title":"Healthier workplace promotion: medical check-ups for hospital workers","authors":"I. Mikačić, Maja Pipić, Sanja Ljubičić, P. Pekić","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I2.1638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale, aims and objectives: Healthier patients require healthier staff and healthier institutions. As a member of the Health Promoting Hospitals (HPH) Network, we focused on the 4 th standard of HPH implementation (Promoting a Healthier Workplace) by developing a program of systematic medical check-ups for all employees. The objectives are: (1) to systematically evaluate hospital worker’s health and according to the results and (2) to improve and promote healthier workplace conditions. Method: Age- and gender-specific systematic medical check-ups for the hospital workers. Results: Out of 1340 workers (1018 medical), 834 (64.5%) expressed initial interest to participate and 658 (49.1%, proportionally medical and non-medical) finally completed the program. Arterial hypertension was the predominant existing medical condition (48.8%). At least one new condition (mainly dyslipidemia, 31.2%), was detected in 347 participants (52.7%). Among 18 (2.7%) participants with newly diagnosed tumors, 3 had malignancies (0.5%). In a multivariate analysis, the risk of detecting a new medical condition was lower in medical ( vs . non-medical) staff (RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.91) and in those with at least one known medical condition ( vs . none) (RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99). Several actions followed: (a) new individual preventive (hypolipemic diet to 293 participants, 44.5%; tighter blood pressure control to 74 participants, 11.2%) and therapeutic (73 participants, 11.1%) measures were prescribed; (b) dietary educational material was disseminated; (c) hospital menus were changed in line with the detected major cardiovascular risk factors and (d) a standardized template for future check-ups was developed. Conclusion: This program has the potential to be introduced as a new indicator of the 4 th standard for heathier workplace promotion in a hospital setting.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"1 1","pages":"238-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I2.1638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: Healthier patients require healthier staff and healthier institutions. As a member of the Health Promoting Hospitals (HPH) Network, we focused on the 4 th standard of HPH implementation (Promoting a Healthier Workplace) by developing a program of systematic medical check-ups for all employees. The objectives are: (1) to systematically evaluate hospital worker’s health and according to the results and (2) to improve and promote healthier workplace conditions. Method: Age- and gender-specific systematic medical check-ups for the hospital workers. Results: Out of 1340 workers (1018 medical), 834 (64.5%) expressed initial interest to participate and 658 (49.1%, proportionally medical and non-medical) finally completed the program. Arterial hypertension was the predominant existing medical condition (48.8%). At least one new condition (mainly dyslipidemia, 31.2%), was detected in 347 participants (52.7%). Among 18 (2.7%) participants with newly diagnosed tumors, 3 had malignancies (0.5%). In a multivariate analysis, the risk of detecting a new medical condition was lower in medical ( vs . non-medical) staff (RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.91) and in those with at least one known medical condition ( vs . none) (RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99). Several actions followed: (a) new individual preventive (hypolipemic diet to 293 participants, 44.5%; tighter blood pressure control to 74 participants, 11.2%) and therapeutic (73 participants, 11.1%) measures were prescribed; (b) dietary educational material was disseminated; (c) hospital menus were changed in line with the detected major cardiovascular risk factors and (d) a standardized template for future check-ups was developed. Conclusion: This program has the potential to be introduced as a new indicator of the 4 th standard for heathier workplace promotion in a hospital setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进更健康的工作场所:对医院工作人员进行体检
理由、目的和目标:更健康的病人需要更健康的工作人员和更健康的机构。作为健康促进医院(HPH)网络的成员,我们通过为所有员工制定系统的医疗检查计划,专注于HPH实施的第四个标准(促进更健康的工作场所)。目标是:(1)根据结果系统地评估医院工作人员的健康状况;(2)改善和促进更健康的工作场所条件。方法:对医院职工进行按年龄和性别进行系统体检。结果:在1340名工人中(1018名医疗人员),834人(64.5%)表示有兴趣参与,658人(49.1%,按比例为医疗和非医疗人员)最终完成了该计划。动脉高血压是主要的医疗状况(48.8%)。在347名参与者(52.7%)中检测到至少一种新疾病(主要是血脂异常,31.2%)。在18例(2.7%)新诊断肿瘤的参与者中,3例为恶性肿瘤(0.5%)。在一项多变量分析中,发现一种新的医疗状况的风险较低。非医务人员(RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.91)和至少有一种已知医疗状况的人员(vs。无)(RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99)。随后采取了几项行动:(a) 293名参与者(44.5%)采用新的个人预防(低血脂饮食);对74名参与者(11.2%)采取更严格的血压控制措施,对73名参与者(11.1%)采取治疗性措施;(b)分发了饮食教育材料;(c)根据检测到的主要心血管风险因素改变了医院菜单;(d)为今后的检查制定了标准化模板。结论:该方案有可能作为促进医院工作场所健康的第4项标准的新指标引入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethical and epistemic roles of narrative in person-centred healthcare Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice? Moving past phronesis: clinical reasoning in person-centered care Persons over models: shared decision-making for person-centered medicine lifestyle and degeneracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1