Open science: Scientists are in favor, what about the librarians?

IF 0.2 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131
L. Shevchenko
{"title":"Open science: Scientists are in favor, what about the librarians?","authors":"L. Shevchenko","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author  reviews  the  results  of the  survey of the  researchers of the Siberian  Branch of the  Russian Academy  of Sciences  (SB RAS), responses to The State  of Open Data survey of researchers in 192  countries  (2016–2022), and interviews  of the  librarians  of SB RAS scientific  organizations on their  attitude to open science  and its information  support.  The study was accomplished within the research  project  of SB RAS State  Public Scientific and Technological  Library “Development of the  functional  model  of scientific  library in the  open  science  information  ecosystem”. The author  demonstrates that  the  researchers have  been  increasingly  publishing  their  results  in the  open  science  (OS) journals, though  still are  unaware  of  OS types, doubt  OS publications quality, and  beware  data  exchange.  The scientists are  positive  about  open  science  and  an  open  data  (OD) system, OD and open-source software, open  cooperation between researchers, as well as open  peer  reviewing. The study also proves that  the  librarians  have been providing traditional services, not very eager  about  open science support  services, doubt  their necessity  and relevance.  The author  argues  that  the librarians  have to reconsider  their  attitude toward  open  science  support, to explore  new resources, to expand  their  competences, and to build the  system  of integrated information support  of scientific research, which makes the libraries active actors in advancing open science practices.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The author  reviews  the  results  of the  survey of the  researchers of the Siberian  Branch of the  Russian Academy  of Sciences  (SB RAS), responses to The State  of Open Data survey of researchers in 192  countries  (2016–2022), and interviews  of the  librarians  of SB RAS scientific  organizations on their  attitude to open science  and its information  support.  The study was accomplished within the research  project  of SB RAS State  Public Scientific and Technological  Library “Development of the  functional  model  of scientific  library in the  open  science  information  ecosystem”. The author  demonstrates that  the  researchers have  been  increasingly  publishing  their  results  in the  open  science  (OS) journals, though  still are  unaware  of  OS types, doubt  OS publications quality, and  beware  data  exchange.  The scientists are  positive  about  open  science  and  an  open  data  (OD) system, OD and open-source software, open  cooperation between researchers, as well as open  peer  reviewing. The study also proves that  the  librarians  have been providing traditional services, not very eager  about  open science support  services, doubt  their necessity  and relevance.  The author  argues  that  the librarians  have to reconsider  their  attitude toward  open  science  support, to explore  new resources, to expand  their  competences, and to build the  system  of integrated information support  of scientific research, which makes the libraries active actors in advancing open science practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放科学:科学家是赞成的,那么图书管理员呢?
作者回顾了对俄罗斯科学院西伯利亚分院研究人员的调查结果、对192个国家研究人员开放数据状况调查(2016-2022)的回应,以及对俄罗斯科学院西伯利亚分院科学机构图书馆员对开放科学的态度及其信息支持的访谈。本研究是在SB RAS国立公共科技图书馆“开放科学信息生态系统中科学图书馆功能模式的构建”研究项目中完成的。作者表明,研究人员越来越多地在开放科学(OS)期刊上发表他们的研究结果,尽管他们仍然不知道OS的类型,怀疑OS出版物的质量,并注意数据交换。科学家们对开放科学和开放数据(OD)系统、OD和开源软件、研究人员之间的开放合作以及开放的同行评审持积极态度。研究还证明,图书馆馆员一直在提供传统的服务,对开放科学支持服务的热情不高,怀疑其必要性和相关性。本文认为,图书馆工作人员必须重新审视自己对开放科学支持的态度,积极开拓新资源,拓展自身能力,构建科学研究综合信息支持体系,使图书馆成为推动开放科学实践的积极行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grouping and categorizing library services at the official websites of central libraries of RF constituent territories: The need for standardized diversification The review of scientific research conducted by libraries: What comes next? Verification of classification modernization solutions (the case study of Library Bibliographic Classification) The virtual reality technologies in the educational processes in Kemerovo State Institute of Culture Special components of society digital transformation to influence technological and behavioral models of modern libraries (Annual report at the Seventh World Professional Forum “SOCHI–2023”)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1