Radiation dose to the heart with hypofractionation in patients with left breast cancer

B. Yadav, D. Das, Narendra Kumar, M. Singhal, N. Robert
{"title":"Radiation dose to the heart with hypofractionation in patients with left breast cancer","authors":"B. Yadav, D. Das, Narendra Kumar, M. Singhal, N. Robert","doi":"10.1017/exp.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction In this study we compared radiation dose received by organs at risk (OARs) after breast conservation surgery(BCS) and mastectomy in patients with left breast cancer. Materials and methods Total 30 patients, 15 each of BCS and mastectomy were included in this study. Planning Computerised Tomography (CT) was done for each patient. Chest wall, whole breast, heart, lungs, LAD, proximal and distal LAD, and contra lateral breast was contoured for each patient. Radiotherapy plans were made by standard tangent field. Dose prescribed was 40Gy/16#/3 weeks. Mean heart dose, LAD, proximal and distal LAD, mean and V5 of right lung, and mean, V5, V10 and V20 of left lung, mean dose and V2 of contra lateral breast were calculated for each patient and compared between BCS and mastectomy patients using student’s T test. Results Mean doses to the heart, LAD, proximal LAD and distal LAD were 3.364Gy, 16.06Gy, 2.7Gy, 27.5Gy; and 4.219Gy, 14.653Gy, 4.306Gy, 24.6Gy, respectively for mastectomy and BCS patients. Left lung mean dose, V5, V10 and V20 were 5.96Gy, 16%, 14%, 12.4%; and 7.69Gy, 21%, 18% and 16% in mastectomy and BCS patients, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference in the doses to the heart and left lung between mastectomy and BCS. Mean dose to the right lung was significantly less in mastectomy as compared to BCS, 0.29Gy vs. 0.51Gy, respectively (p = 0.007). Mean dose to the opposite breast was significantly lower in patients with mastectomy than BCS (0.54Gy Vs 0.37Gy, p = 0.007). The dose to the distal LAD was significantly higher than proximal LAD both in BCS (24.6Gy Vs 4.3Gy, p = <0.0001) and mastectomy (27.5Gy Vs 2.7Gy, p = <0.0001) patients. Conclusion There was no difference in doses received by heart and left lung between BCS and mastectomy patients. Mean doses to the right lung and breast were significantly less in mastectomy patients.","PeriodicalId":12269,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Results","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Results","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/exp.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction In this study we compared radiation dose received by organs at risk (OARs) after breast conservation surgery(BCS) and mastectomy in patients with left breast cancer. Materials and methods Total 30 patients, 15 each of BCS and mastectomy were included in this study. Planning Computerised Tomography (CT) was done for each patient. Chest wall, whole breast, heart, lungs, LAD, proximal and distal LAD, and contra lateral breast was contoured for each patient. Radiotherapy plans were made by standard tangent field. Dose prescribed was 40Gy/16#/3 weeks. Mean heart dose, LAD, proximal and distal LAD, mean and V5 of right lung, and mean, V5, V10 and V20 of left lung, mean dose and V2 of contra lateral breast were calculated for each patient and compared between BCS and mastectomy patients using student’s T test. Results Mean doses to the heart, LAD, proximal LAD and distal LAD were 3.364Gy, 16.06Gy, 2.7Gy, 27.5Gy; and 4.219Gy, 14.653Gy, 4.306Gy, 24.6Gy, respectively for mastectomy and BCS patients. Left lung mean dose, V5, V10 and V20 were 5.96Gy, 16%, 14%, 12.4%; and 7.69Gy, 21%, 18% and 16% in mastectomy and BCS patients, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference in the doses to the heart and left lung between mastectomy and BCS. Mean dose to the right lung was significantly less in mastectomy as compared to BCS, 0.29Gy vs. 0.51Gy, respectively (p = 0.007). Mean dose to the opposite breast was significantly lower in patients with mastectomy than BCS (0.54Gy Vs 0.37Gy, p = 0.007). The dose to the distal LAD was significantly higher than proximal LAD both in BCS (24.6Gy Vs 4.3Gy, p = <0.0001) and mastectomy (27.5Gy Vs 2.7Gy, p = <0.0001) patients. Conclusion There was no difference in doses received by heart and left lung between BCS and mastectomy patients. Mean doses to the right lung and breast were significantly less in mastectomy patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左乳腺癌患者低分割对心脏的辐射剂量
摘要:在本研究中,我们比较了左乳腺癌患者保乳手术(BCS)和乳房切除术后危险器官(OARs)接受的辐射剂量。材料与方法本研究共纳入30例患者,BCS和乳房切除术各15例。对每位患者进行计划计算机断层扫描(CT)。对每位患者的胸壁、全乳、心脏、肺、LAD、LAD近端和远端以及对侧乳房进行轮廓。采用标准切线场制定放疗方案。处方剂量为40Gy/16#/3周。计算每例患者的平均心脏剂量、LAD、近端和远端LAD、右肺平均、V5、左肺平均、V5、V10、V20、对侧乳腺平均剂量、V2,并采用学生T检验比较BCS与乳腺切除术患者的差异。结果心脏、LAD、LAD近端、LAD远端平均剂量分别为3.364Gy、16.06Gy、2.7Gy、27.5Gy;乳腺切除术和BCS患者分别为4.219Gy、14.653Gy、4.306Gy、24.6Gy。左肺平均剂量、V5、V10、V20分别为5.96Gy、16%、14%、12.4%;7.69Gy,乳腺切除术和BCS患者分别为21%、18%和16%。乳腺切除术和BCS对心脏和左肺的剂量无统计学差异。与BCS相比,乳房切除术中右肺的平均剂量显著减少,分别为0.29Gy和0.51Gy (p = 0.007)。乳房切除术患者的对侧平均剂量明显低于BCS患者(0.54Gy Vs 0.37Gy, p = 0.007)。在BCS (24.6Gy Vs 4.3Gy, p = <0.0001)和乳房切除术(27.5Gy Vs 2.7Gy, p = <0.0001)患者中,远端LAD的剂量均显著高于近端LAD。结论BCS与乳腺切除术患者的心脏和左肺接受剂量无差异。乳房切除术患者对右肺和乳房的平均剂量明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE COST OF PAEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL TUBERCULOSIS TREATMENT IN INDIA: EVIDENCE FROM A TEACHING HOSPITAL On L-derivatives and biextensions of Calabi–Yau motives Handedness and test anxiety: An examination of mixed-handed and consistent-handed students Analysis of declining trends in sugarcane yield at Wonji-Shoa Sugar Estate, Central Ethiopia Raw driving data of passenger cars considering traffic conditions in Semnan city
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1