Territorial cohesion, the COVID-19 crisis and the urban paradox

IF 0.7 Q2 AREA STUDIES Baltic Region Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI:10.18335/region.v9i1.403
Panagiotis Artelaris, G. Mavrommatis
{"title":"Territorial cohesion, the COVID-19 crisis and the urban paradox","authors":"Panagiotis Artelaris, G. Mavrommatis","doi":"10.18335/region.v9i1.403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent economic downturn due to the lockdown of economic activities have spurred a lively debate concerning their effects across locations in the EU and the resulting challenges to territorial cohesion policy. The COVID-19 emergency not only has provoked EU cohesion policy responses but also may change some of the basic principles on which these policies have been built. This paper briefly casts light on some present and future implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for two fundamental aspects of territorial cohesion policy, namely urbanization and economic agglomeration. Both aspects are linked to territorial cohesion's significant dimension of polycentricity (as balanced and harmonious development), and together they constitute a challenge to established norms of urban agglomeration. Finally, the paper discusses some policy ideas that have recently (re)appeared on the European policy landscape. Such policy options bring together urban development and regional policy agendas with the aim of promoting territorial cohesion by attempting to solve the `urban paradox' - the coexisting positive and negative effects of urban agglomeration and its established geography.\n ","PeriodicalId":43257,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Region","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i1.403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The recent COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent economic downturn due to the lockdown of economic activities have spurred a lively debate concerning their effects across locations in the EU and the resulting challenges to territorial cohesion policy. The COVID-19 emergency not only has provoked EU cohesion policy responses but also may change some of the basic principles on which these policies have been built. This paper briefly casts light on some present and future implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for two fundamental aspects of territorial cohesion policy, namely urbanization and economic agglomeration. Both aspects are linked to territorial cohesion's significant dimension of polycentricity (as balanced and harmonious development), and together they constitute a challenge to established norms of urban agglomeration. Finally, the paper discusses some policy ideas that have recently (re)appeared on the European policy landscape. Such policy options bring together urban development and regional policy agendas with the aim of promoting territorial cohesion by attempting to solve the `urban paradox' - the coexisting positive and negative effects of urban agglomeration and its established geography.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地域凝聚力、COVID-19危机和城市悖论
最近的COVID-19大流行以及随后由于经济活动封锁而导致的经济衰退,引发了一场关于其在欧盟各地的影响以及由此对领土凝聚力政策构成挑战的激烈辩论。COVID-19紧急情况不仅引发了欧盟的凝聚力政策反应,而且可能会改变这些政策所依据的一些基本原则。本文简要阐述了2019冠状病毒病大流行对区域凝聚力政策的两个基本方面,即城市化和经济集聚的一些当前和未来影响。这两个方面都与地域凝聚力的多中心性有关(作为平衡与和谐的发展),它们共同构成了对城市群既定规范的挑战。最后,本文讨论了最近(重新)出现在欧洲政策格局中的一些政策思想。这样的政策选择将城市发展和区域政策议程结合在一起,目的是通过试图解决“城市悖论”——城市群及其既定地理环境共存的积极和消极影响——来促进领土凝聚力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Baltic Region
Baltic Region AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
37.50%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relating Sustainable Development Goals in a Conceptual Integrated Model of Growth and Welfare COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortality Factors Spatial Economics and Totalitarian Temptations Credit market development and agricultural production in selected African countries Financial Development and Human Development in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1