Application of Sand-Ramp Fracturing Pumping Mode in Unconventional Shales Stimulation

Guangzhi Yang, Shicheng Zhang, Ming Liu
{"title":"Application of Sand-Ramp Fracturing Pumping Mode in Unconventional Shales Stimulation","authors":"Guangzhi Yang, Shicheng Zhang, Ming Liu","doi":"10.2118/191154-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sand-slug fracturing has been the main fracturing pumping mode due to the tightness of shale. This mode makes it easier to inject proppants. However, it may cause poor connectivity in the middle brittle formation due to the discontinuous propping. This paper describes an attempt to fracture the unconventional shales with conventional sand-ramp fracturing pumping mode. The results show that good effect is achieved compared with the sand-slug fracturing mode used in the adjacent wells.\n Shale reservoir reconstruction has large construction displacement and high pressure, and it adopts fracturing technology of slickwater and linear glue1. In other blocks, Sand-slug mode causes large amounts of slickwater injecting into the formation. The role of water, in addition to carrying sand and making seams, will also cause \"water lock\" in the micro-fissure, reducing the gas permeability. Therefore, the large amount of liquid is not good to the reservoir.\n The Sand-ramp modes using less fluid and higher sand content2-3, resulting in a greater height and length of the fractures. By using a small amount of proppant, Sand-ramp mode can also achieve high conductivity4, communicating the natural cracks5-7 at the same time. Two wells were designed for Sand-ramp mode in the test area.\n Based on the understandings on geological characteristics and formation property, the sand-ramp fracturing pumping mode was designed. Two of six wells in the pad were selected to apply this mode. To maximize the stimulated reservoir volume, slickwater accounted for 40% to 60% of the total injected fluids. 100-mesh quartz sands were pumped in priority to improve the complexity of fracture. Then, the 40-70 mesh ceramsites was pumped with crosslinked gel to support the primary, secondary and natural fractures. The pumping rate is 12-13 cubic meters per minute and no acid is used throughout the whole pumping process.\n The maximum proppant concentration of sand-ramp reached to 480 kilogram per cubic meters, which was much higher than that of sand-slugs. As a result, good propped fractures were obtained. Since no fluid sweep was used after the sand-slug, the average fluid injection per stage is declined by 27%, but the average sand injection volume was increased by 17%, which significantly reduced the cost and the possible influence to environment. With the sand-ramp mode, the highest test production of the block was up to 278500 cubic meters per day. This well produced 35 million cubic meters of shale gas in 270 days.\n The practicability of the sand-ramp pumping mode used in unconventional shales is proven to be positive, especially in the formation with high horizontal stress difference. However, the development result needs to be continuously studied.","PeriodicalId":11006,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, June 27, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191154-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sand-slug fracturing has been the main fracturing pumping mode due to the tightness of shale. This mode makes it easier to inject proppants. However, it may cause poor connectivity in the middle brittle formation due to the discontinuous propping. This paper describes an attempt to fracture the unconventional shales with conventional sand-ramp fracturing pumping mode. The results show that good effect is achieved compared with the sand-slug fracturing mode used in the adjacent wells. Shale reservoir reconstruction has large construction displacement and high pressure, and it adopts fracturing technology of slickwater and linear glue1. In other blocks, Sand-slug mode causes large amounts of slickwater injecting into the formation. The role of water, in addition to carrying sand and making seams, will also cause "water lock" in the micro-fissure, reducing the gas permeability. Therefore, the large amount of liquid is not good to the reservoir. The Sand-ramp modes using less fluid and higher sand content2-3, resulting in a greater height and length of the fractures. By using a small amount of proppant, Sand-ramp mode can also achieve high conductivity4, communicating the natural cracks5-7 at the same time. Two wells were designed for Sand-ramp mode in the test area. Based on the understandings on geological characteristics and formation property, the sand-ramp fracturing pumping mode was designed. Two of six wells in the pad were selected to apply this mode. To maximize the stimulated reservoir volume, slickwater accounted for 40% to 60% of the total injected fluids. 100-mesh quartz sands were pumped in priority to improve the complexity of fracture. Then, the 40-70 mesh ceramsites was pumped with crosslinked gel to support the primary, secondary and natural fractures. The pumping rate is 12-13 cubic meters per minute and no acid is used throughout the whole pumping process. The maximum proppant concentration of sand-ramp reached to 480 kilogram per cubic meters, which was much higher than that of sand-slugs. As a result, good propped fractures were obtained. Since no fluid sweep was used after the sand-slug, the average fluid injection per stage is declined by 27%, but the average sand injection volume was increased by 17%, which significantly reduced the cost and the possible influence to environment. With the sand-ramp mode, the highest test production of the block was up to 278500 cubic meters per day. This well produced 35 million cubic meters of shale gas in 270 days. The practicability of the sand-ramp pumping mode used in unconventional shales is proven to be positive, especially in the formation with high horizontal stress difference. However, the development result needs to be continuously studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
砂坡道压裂泵送模式在非常规页岩增产中的应用
由于页岩的致密性,砂段塞压裂一直是主要的压裂泵送方式。这种模式使得注入支撑剂更加容易。然而,由于支撑的不连续,可能会导致中间脆性地层连通性差。本文介绍了采用常规砂坡道压裂泵送方式对非常规页岩进行压裂的尝试。结果表明,与邻井采用的砂段塞压裂方式相比,该压裂方式取得了良好的效果。页岩储层改造施工排量大、施工压力高,采用滑溜水-线性胶合压裂技术。在其他区块,砂段塞模式会导致大量滑溜水注入地层。水的作用,除了携砂造缝外,还会在微裂隙中造成“锁水”,降低透气性。因此,大量的液体对储层是不利的。砂坡道模式使用更少的流体和更高的含砂量,导致裂缝的高度和长度更大。通过使用少量支撑剂,砂坡道模式也可以获得高导电性,同时连通天然裂缝。在试验区设计了两口井采用砂坡道模式。基于对地质特征和地层性质的认识,设计了砂坡道压裂泵送模式。该区块的6口井中有2口被选中应用该模式。为了最大限度地提高增产油藏的体积,滑溜水占注入流体总量的40%至60%。优先泵送100目石英砂,以提高裂缝的复杂性。然后,用交联凝胶泵送40-70目陶粒,以支撑初级、次级和天然裂缝。泵送速率为每分钟12-13立方米,在整个泵送过程中不使用酸。砂坡道的最大支撑剂浓度可达480 kg / m3,远高于砂段塞。结果,获得了良好的支撑裂缝。由于在砂段塞之后没有进行扫井作业,每级平均注液量下降了27%,但平均注砂量增加了17%,显著降低了成本和对环境的影响。在砂坡道模式下,该区块的最高测试产量可达278500立方米/天。这口井在270天内生产了3500万立方米的页岩气。在非常规页岩中,特别是在水平应力差较大的地层中,证明了坡道抽砂模式的实用性。但是,开发效果还需要不断的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Integrated Dynamic Asset Modeling to Predict and Resolve Production Instabilities in an Offshore Facility, A Case Study, Mexico The Casing Deformation During Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing: Why it is so Serious in Weiyuan-Changning, China? Re-Evaluating Contributions from Thin Bedded Reservoirs: Integrated Reservoir Modelling of the Greater Dolphin Area Experimental Evaluation of Sand Porosity in Eagle Ford Shale Fractures An Experimental Investigation of Proppant Diagenesis and Proppant-Formation-Fluid Interactions in Hydraulic Fracturing of Eagle Ford Shale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1