Exclusionary Effects of Internal Transactions of Large Business Groups

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Global Economic Review Pub Date : 2020-03-26 DOI:10.1080/1226508X.2020.1745085
Yangsoo Jin
{"title":"Exclusionary Effects of Internal Transactions of Large Business Groups","authors":"Yangsoo Jin","doi":"10.1080/1226508X.2020.1745085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Antitrust law in Korea regulates internal transactions by the owner and his family, or ‘Person with Special Interest (PSI)’ of a large business group. Its regulatory grounds, however, are not well-established. This paper analyses internal transactions from the perspective of competition policy, particularly, exclusionary effects. Internal transactions between the upstream- and downstream-affiliates of a business group shrink the size of the upstream market and hence squeeze the profitability of potential entrants. Thus, it may exclude the entrants which, absent the transactions, would enter the market and contribute to consumers. In addition, it may lead to a breach of the fiduciary duty of PSI. We provide some policy implications by analysing the optimal behaviour of PSI.","PeriodicalId":45235,"journal":{"name":"Global Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2020.1745085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Antitrust law in Korea regulates internal transactions by the owner and his family, or ‘Person with Special Interest (PSI)’ of a large business group. Its regulatory grounds, however, are not well-established. This paper analyses internal transactions from the perspective of competition policy, particularly, exclusionary effects. Internal transactions between the upstream- and downstream-affiliates of a business group shrink the size of the upstream market and hence squeeze the profitability of potential entrants. Thus, it may exclude the entrants which, absent the transactions, would enter the market and contribute to consumers. In addition, it may lead to a breach of the fiduciary duty of PSI. We provide some policy implications by analysing the optimal behaviour of PSI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大企业集团内部交易的排他性效应
韩国的反垄断法对大型企业集团的所有者及其家族或“特殊利害关系人(PSI)”的内部交易进行监管。然而,它的监管基础并不完善。本文从竞争政策的角度分析了内部交易,特别是排他性效应。企业集团上下游子公司之间的内部交易缩小了上游市场的规模,从而挤压了潜在进入者的盈利能力。因此,它可能会排除那些在没有交易的情况下进入市场并为消费者做出贡献的进入者。此外,这有可能导致PSI的信义义务的违反。我们通过分析PSI的最佳行为提供了一些政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Household Debt and Housing: Source of Income Inequality in South Korea Does the Depth of Digital Trade Rules Boost Bilateral Service Value-Added Trade? Several Modes of Digitalisation of Value Chains and Their Effects on Firm Behaviour and Performance: Case Studies of Apparel and Video Game Industries Preference of a Currency for International Payments among the Three Major SDR Currencies Effects of Endogenous Longevity on Transitional Dynamics of Intergenerational Mobility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1