For You, Me, Them? - Choosing Designated Communities for Personal Digital Archiving

Achim Osswald
{"title":"For You, Me, Them? - Choosing Designated Communities for Personal Digital Archiving","authors":"Achim Osswald","doi":"10.18452/1467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper addresses motivations for choosing designated communities when applying measures for archiving personal digital data and digital objects. Results of two case studies focusing on designated communities and the types of archived digital objects are reported and discussed.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"4 1","pages":"362-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18452/1467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper addresses motivations for choosing designated communities when applying measures for archiving personal digital data and digital objects. Results of two case studies focusing on designated communities and the types of archived digital objects are reported and discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为你,为我,为他们?-选择个人数码存档的指定社区
本文阐述了在应用个人数字数据和数字对象存档措施时选择指定社区的动机。报告和讨论了两个案例研究的结果,重点是指定社区和存档数字对象的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Practices of Early Career Researchers: A Qualitative Study on Research and Teaching Behavior Design and Development of an Emoji Sentiment Lexicon Does the General Public Share Research on Twitter? A Case Study on the Online Conversation about the Search for a Nuclear Repository in Germany Vom Datenkatalog zum Wissensgraph - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR Omission of Information: Identifying Political Slant via an Analysis of Co-occurring Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1