A study of failure and abandonment of public sector-driven civil engineering projects in Nigeria: An empirical review

E. Ubani, C. Ononuju
{"title":"A study of failure and abandonment of public sector-driven civil engineering projects in Nigeria: An empirical review","authors":"E. Ubani, C. Ononuju","doi":"10.5251/AJSIR.2013.4.1.75.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incessant failure and abandonment of public sector projects are still posing serious concern and challenges to the society and other stakeholders in civil engineering and construction industries. The study identifies and examines the salient factors and the warning signals responsible for failure and abandonment of public sector driven civil engineering projects with a view of directing efforts towards forestalling the problems. Opinion survey was adopted with area and judgmental sampling procedures. Primary data based on the identified factors, was captured with the instrument of questionnaire from professionals in civil engineering projects operating in the South East geopolitical zone of Nigeria. The analytical tools used in the study were severity index, spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, relative agreement factors and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W.). The rankings of different professionals were significantly correlated. The result of percentage relative agreement factors indicates that the most salient factors causing failure and abandonment of public sector driven civil engineering projects in order of significance are frequent changes in government and political power, unreliable mode of financing and payment of completed work, and project contract sum indirectly used to compensate political big-wigs etc. Wtest further substantiates the results by indicating significant degree of concordance in opinion of experts. The study therefore concludes that politicallyinduced corruption, undefined and non compliance to the agreed mode of financing and payment of completed work are the bane of project success. It is therefore a matter of legislation and policy formulation which should be instituted to avert failure and abandonment of public sector-driven civil engineering projects.","PeriodicalId":7661,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5251/AJSIR.2013.4.1.75.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Incessant failure and abandonment of public sector projects are still posing serious concern and challenges to the society and other stakeholders in civil engineering and construction industries. The study identifies and examines the salient factors and the warning signals responsible for failure and abandonment of public sector driven civil engineering projects with a view of directing efforts towards forestalling the problems. Opinion survey was adopted with area and judgmental sampling procedures. Primary data based on the identified factors, was captured with the instrument of questionnaire from professionals in civil engineering projects operating in the South East geopolitical zone of Nigeria. The analytical tools used in the study were severity index, spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, relative agreement factors and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W.). The rankings of different professionals were significantly correlated. The result of percentage relative agreement factors indicates that the most salient factors causing failure and abandonment of public sector driven civil engineering projects in order of significance are frequent changes in government and political power, unreliable mode of financing and payment of completed work, and project contract sum indirectly used to compensate political big-wigs etc. Wtest further substantiates the results by indicating significant degree of concordance in opinion of experts. The study therefore concludes that politicallyinduced corruption, undefined and non compliance to the agreed mode of financing and payment of completed work are the bane of project success. It is therefore a matter of legislation and policy formulation which should be instituted to avert failure and abandonment of public sector-driven civil engineering projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚公共部门驱动的土木工程项目的失败和放弃研究:一项实证回顾
公营工程项目不断失败或被放弃,仍然是社会及土木工程及建造业其他持份者的严重关切和挑战。这项研究查明和审查了公共部门推动的土木工程项目失败和放弃的主要因素和警告信号,以期指导努力预防这些问题。采用地区抽样和判断抽样的意见调查方法。根据确定的因素,通过问卷调查工具从尼日利亚东南地缘政治区域的土木工程项目专业人员那里获取了主要数据。研究使用的分析工具为严重程度指数、spearman等级相关系数、相对一致因子和Kendall和谐系数(w)。不同专业的排名显著相关。百分比相对一致因素的结果表明,导致公共部门主导的土木工程项目失败和放弃的最显著因素是政府和政治权力的频繁变化、不可靠的融资和完成工作的支付方式、项目合同金额间接用于补偿政治大人物等。Wtest通过表明专家意见的显著一致性进一步证实了结果。因此,该研究得出结论,政治导致的腐败、不明确和不遵守已完成工作的商定融资和支付模式是项目成功的祸根。因此,应该制定立法和政策,以避免公共部门推动的土木工程项目的失败和放弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Family of Non-Standard Finite Difference Schemes for the Logistic Equations The potential of removing toxic elements from red sea water by using functionalised natural zeolite and synthetic zeolite Modelling catalyst regeneration in an industrial FCC unit Synthesis of zeolites and their applications as Ion exchange to remove water hardness On some models based on first order differential equations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1