The BRICS in the Contemporary Global Order: Objectives, Capabilities, and Limitations

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Pub Date : 2019-11-13 DOI:10.26618/ojip.v9i2.2106
Alberto Varela, Rafael Gustavo Miranda Delgado
{"title":"The BRICS in the Contemporary Global Order: Objectives, Capabilities, and Limitations","authors":"Alberto Varela, Rafael Gustavo Miranda Delgado","doi":"10.26618/ojip.v9i2.2106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the first time in the history of mankind several powers emerge simultaneously in different latitudes and can interact intensively. The Contemporary Global Order has presented significant changes among which highlight the absolute and relative decline of American power, and the emergence of new actors who have greater agency power in their international relations. One of these actors is the so-called BRICS that brings together Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. For this reason the aim of this investigation is to analyzing the effective and potential power of the BRICS in the Contemporary Global Order. The methodology is it is situated inside the analytical eclecticism which is characterized by explaining a certain phenomenon without using a block of explanations sustained in a single tradition, but it takes and re-means the elements that it considers most pertinent for the case study. The article states that the BRICS do not claim or have the capacity to become hegemons. The objectives and capabilities of the BRICS have been especially notable in terms of international political economy, especially in the financial architecture, where China has its greatest power. The BRICS can promote an alternative to the existing game rules in the international system and promote a more plural world. They have the capacity to reform and build international economic institutions that allow a fairer distribution of material resources. They can curb unilateral global power interventions in regional affairs, framing interventions for humanitarian causes within multilateralism and the Responsibility to Protect. In terms of democracy and human rights, they will not make any contribution since their main actors, such as China and Russia, are examples of disrespect for these values.","PeriodicalId":40252,"journal":{"name":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otoritas-Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v9i2.2106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For the first time in the history of mankind several powers emerge simultaneously in different latitudes and can interact intensively. The Contemporary Global Order has presented significant changes among which highlight the absolute and relative decline of American power, and the emergence of new actors who have greater agency power in their international relations. One of these actors is the so-called BRICS that brings together Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. For this reason the aim of this investigation is to analyzing the effective and potential power of the BRICS in the Contemporary Global Order. The methodology is it is situated inside the analytical eclecticism which is characterized by explaining a certain phenomenon without using a block of explanations sustained in a single tradition, but it takes and re-means the elements that it considers most pertinent for the case study. The article states that the BRICS do not claim or have the capacity to become hegemons. The objectives and capabilities of the BRICS have been especially notable in terms of international political economy, especially in the financial architecture, where China has its greatest power. The BRICS can promote an alternative to the existing game rules in the international system and promote a more plural world. They have the capacity to reform and build international economic institutions that allow a fairer distribution of material resources. They can curb unilateral global power interventions in regional affairs, framing interventions for humanitarian causes within multilateralism and the Responsibility to Protect. In terms of democracy and human rights, they will not make any contribution since their main actors, such as China and Russia, are examples of disrespect for these values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代全球秩序中的金砖国家:目标、能力与局限
在人类历史上第一次,几个力量同时出现在不同的纬度,并且可以密切互动。当代全球秩序出现了重大变化,其中突出表现为美国实力的绝对和相对衰落,以及在国际关系中拥有更大代理权力的新参与者的出现。其中之一就是所谓的金砖国家,由巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非组成。因此,本次调查的目的是分析金砖国家在当代全球秩序中的有效和潜在力量。方法论是,它位于分析折衷主义内部,其特点是解释特定现象,而不使用单一传统中持续的解释块,但它采取并重新意味着它认为与案例研究最相关的元素。文章指出,金砖国家不主张也没有能力成为霸权国家。金砖国家的目标和能力在国际政治经济领域尤其引人注目,尤其是在中国最具影响力的金融架构领域。金砖国家可以推动替代现有国际体系的游戏规则,推动世界走向多元化。它们有能力改革和建立国际经济机构,使物质资源得到更公平的分配。它们可以遏制全球大国对地区事务的单边干预,在多边主义和保护责任框架内为人道主义事业进行干预。在民主主义和人权方面,他们不会做出任何贡献,因为他们的主要参与者,如中国和俄罗斯,是不尊重这些价值观的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Civil Service Police Unit principle : no punishment and no taxation without representation The Bretton Woods institutions and the quest for development in Africa Disputing land: argumentative turn in local land policy conflict in Central Java, Indonesia Declining democracy: autocratization in Indonesia during the Jokowi years Policy process in Indonesia during COVID-19: a cross-sectoral policy perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1