COVID-19 and Co-Production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice: Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-Production, Peter Beresford, Michelle Farr, Gary Hickey, Meerat Kaur, Josephine Ocloo, Doreen Tembo and Oli Williams (eds)
{"title":"COVID-19 and Co-Production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice: Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-Production, Peter Beresford, Michelle Farr, Gary Hickey, Meerat Kaur, Josephine Ocloo, Doreen Tembo and Oli Williams (eds)","authors":"Autumn Roesch‐Marsh","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcab229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book includes sixteen chapters written by a diverse group of fortyeight authors from across the fields of health, social work and social care. These authors have multiple identities in their fields and bring experiences of receiving services, providing services, research and the academy, activism and community work, advocacy and policy development. The book was published by Policy Press as part of the Rapid Responses pandemic series. It is one of two volumes published on the theme of co-production in health and social care research, policy and practice. The books are both free and open access and this was funded by the Health Foundation. In this review, I will discuss Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-production. I believe this book should be essential reading for all of us working in the fields of health, social work and social care. There are three reasons for this. The first relates to the way the book was written and what we can learn from this. As the editors explain in the introduction to the book, in what I expect is a bit of an understatement, bringing together such a large and diverse group of authors during a pandemic was a ‘challenge’. However, they sought to develop the book in a way that reflected the principles of participatory practice. This meant that they worked to support a diverse range of different contributions and enable new collaborations. The editors highlight that achieving their participatory aims for the book was not easy and they suggest they were not always successful. Despite this, it is clear they have achieved something really unique and important. They have managed to bring together a genuinely diverse range of authors, centring voices and experiences that are often marginalised within the academy. For example, Chapter 8 Sovereign and","PeriodicalId":48259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Work","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This book includes sixteen chapters written by a diverse group of fortyeight authors from across the fields of health, social work and social care. These authors have multiple identities in their fields and bring experiences of receiving services, providing services, research and the academy, activism and community work, advocacy and policy development. The book was published by Policy Press as part of the Rapid Responses pandemic series. It is one of two volumes published on the theme of co-production in health and social care research, policy and practice. The books are both free and open access and this was funded by the Health Foundation. In this review, I will discuss Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-production. I believe this book should be essential reading for all of us working in the fields of health, social work and social care. There are three reasons for this. The first relates to the way the book was written and what we can learn from this. As the editors explain in the introduction to the book, in what I expect is a bit of an understatement, bringing together such a large and diverse group of authors during a pandemic was a ‘challenge’. However, they sought to develop the book in a way that reflected the principles of participatory practice. This meant that they worked to support a diverse range of different contributions and enable new collaborations. The editors highlight that achieving their participatory aims for the book was not easy and they suggest they were not always successful. Despite this, it is clear they have achieved something really unique and important. They have managed to bring together a genuinely diverse range of authors, centring voices and experiences that are often marginalised within the academy. For example, Chapter 8 Sovereign and
期刊介绍：
Published for the British Association of Social Workers, this is the leading academic social work journal in the UK. It covers every aspect of social work, with papers reporting research, discussing practice, and examining principles and theories. It is read by social work educators, researchers, practitioners and managers who wish to keep up to date with theoretical and empirical developments in the field.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
