{"title":"The Prob em of Psychologism and the Idea of a Phenomenological Science","authors":"S. Rinofner-Kreidl","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823284467.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is a detailed discussion of the nature of psychologism and the efficacy of Husserl’s critique thereof. It argues, first, that the critique of logical psychologism in the “Prolegomena” reveals that the problem raised by psychologism is fundamentally one of determining the proper philosophical standpoint and, second, that this critique played a central and decisive role in the development of Husserl’s phenomenology. The proper standpoint incorporates a commitment to the presuppositionless description of essential structures of experience, and from this perspective, Husserl saw that his initial response to psychologism was inadequate insofar as it focused on the consequences of psychologism rather than its presuppositions.","PeriodicalId":44408,"journal":{"name":"HUSSERL STUDIES","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUSSERL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823284467.003.0002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This chapter is a detailed discussion of the nature of psychologism and the efficacy of Husserl’s critique thereof. It argues, first, that the critique of logical psychologism in the “Prolegomena” reveals that the problem raised by psychologism is fundamentally one of determining the proper philosophical standpoint and, second, that this critique played a central and decisive role in the development of Husserl’s phenomenology. The proper standpoint incorporates a commitment to the presuppositionless description of essential structures of experience, and from this perspective, Husserl saw that his initial response to psychologism was inadequate insofar as it focused on the consequences of psychologism rather than its presuppositions.
期刊介绍：
Husserl Studies is an international forum for the presentation, discussion, criticism, and development of Husserl''s philosophy. It also publishes papers devoted to systematic investigations in the various philosophical sub-areas of phenomenological research (e.g., theory of intentionality, theory of meaning, ethics and action theory, etc.), where such work is oriented toward the development, adaptation, and/or criticism of Husserlian phenomenology. Husserl Studies also invites contributions dealing with phenomenology in relation to other directions in philosophy such as hermeneutics, critical theory, and the various modes of analytic philosophy. The aim, in keeping with Husserl''s own philosophical self-understanding, is to demonstrate that phenomenology is a reflective and methodologically disciplined form of philosophical inquiry that can and must prove itself through its handling of concrete problems. Thus Husserl Studies provides a venue for careful textual work on Husserl''s published and unpublished writings and for historical, systematic, and problem-oriented phenomenological inquiry. It also publishes critical reviews of current work on Husserl, and reviews of other philosophical literature that has a direct bearing on the themes and areas of interest to Husserl Studies.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
