Patients’ views and experiences of involuntary hospitalization in Greece: a focus group study

S. Stylianidis, L. Peppou, N. Drakonakis, G. Iatropoulou, S. Nikolaidi, Kyriaki Tsikou, K. Souliotis
{"title":"Patients’ views and experiences of involuntary hospitalization in Greece: a focus group study","authors":"S. Stylianidis, L. Peppou, N. Drakonakis, G. Iatropoulou, S. Nikolaidi, Kyriaki Tsikou, K. Souliotis","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1409778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Involuntary hospitalization of people with mental illness raises important ethical and legal concerns worldwide; however, only a handful of studies have investigated the patients’ perspective in depth. The present study aims at exploring patients’ views about the rightfulness of compulsory admission, their experience of hospitalization and potential interventions for reducing its effect in Athens. Fourteen patients who were involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the Attica region and had been discharged one month prior to the group discussion, participated in the study. A focus group design drawing on Interpretative Thematic Analysis was employed. The themes that emerged include conflicting attitudes towards the rightfulness of admission, the absence of patient participation in any form of decision-making, substantial infringement of human rights and patients’ dearth of knowledge about them. Therefore, raising awareness initiatives, adequate training of all involved parties, the integration of psychotherapy in the treatment plan, the creation of a therapeutic milieu and less coercive alternatives to acute psychiatric care were the course of action suggested by patients. In line with this, concerted efforts on the part of patients, their families, clinicians and policy makers should be channelled towards securing strict enforcement of pertinent legislation and advancing patient-centred care.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"41 1","pages":"425 - 436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1409778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

ABSTRACT Involuntary hospitalization of people with mental illness raises important ethical and legal concerns worldwide; however, only a handful of studies have investigated the patients’ perspective in depth. The present study aims at exploring patients’ views about the rightfulness of compulsory admission, their experience of hospitalization and potential interventions for reducing its effect in Athens. Fourteen patients who were involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the Attica region and had been discharged one month prior to the group discussion, participated in the study. A focus group design drawing on Interpretative Thematic Analysis was employed. The themes that emerged include conflicting attitudes towards the rightfulness of admission, the absence of patient participation in any form of decision-making, substantial infringement of human rights and patients’ dearth of knowledge about them. Therefore, raising awareness initiatives, adequate training of all involved parties, the integration of psychotherapy in the treatment plan, the creation of a therapeutic milieu and less coercive alternatives to acute psychiatric care were the course of action suggested by patients. In line with this, concerted efforts on the part of patients, their families, clinicians and policy makers should be channelled towards securing strict enforcement of pertinent legislation and advancing patient-centred care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊患者对非自愿住院的看法和经验:焦点小组研究
精神疾病患者的非自愿住院在世界范围内引起了重要的伦理和法律问题;然而,只有少数研究深入调查了患者的观点。本研究旨在探讨病人对强制入院的正确性的看法,他们的住院经验和潜在的干预措施,以减少其在雅典的影响。14名非自愿入住阿提卡地区一家精神病院并在小组讨论前一个月出院的病人参加了这项研究。采用解释性主题分析的焦点小组设计。出现的主题包括对入院合法性的相互矛盾的态度,患者没有参与任何形式的决策,严重侵犯人权以及患者缺乏有关人权的知识。因此,提高认识的倡议、对所有有关各方进行充分培训、将心理治疗纳入治疗计划、创造治疗环境以及减少对急性精神病治疗的强制性替代方案是患者建议的行动方针。据此,应引导患者、其家属、临床医生和决策者共同努力,确保严格执行相关立法,推进以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
期刊最新文献
Acculturation, ethnic identity, and psychological well-being of Albanian-American immigrants in the United States Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) in children and adolescents Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees Disabled or Deaf? Investigating mental health clinicians’ knowledge of and attitude towards Deafness as a culture* Experiences of HIV stigma in rural Southern religious settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1