S. Stylianidis, L. Peppou, N. Drakonakis, G. Iatropoulou, S. Nikolaidi, Kyriaki Tsikou, K. Souliotis
{"title":"Patients’ views and experiences of involuntary hospitalization in Greece: a focus group study","authors":"S. Stylianidis, L. Peppou, N. Drakonakis, G. Iatropoulou, S. Nikolaidi, Kyriaki Tsikou, K. Souliotis","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1409778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Involuntary hospitalization of people with mental illness raises important ethical and legal concerns worldwide; however, only a handful of studies have investigated the patients’ perspective in depth. The present study aims at exploring patients’ views about the rightfulness of compulsory admission, their experience of hospitalization and potential interventions for reducing its effect in Athens. Fourteen patients who were involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the Attica region and had been discharged one month prior to the group discussion, participated in the study. A focus group design drawing on Interpretative Thematic Analysis was employed. The themes that emerged include conflicting attitudes towards the rightfulness of admission, the absence of patient participation in any form of decision-making, substantial infringement of human rights and patients’ dearth of knowledge about them. Therefore, raising awareness initiatives, adequate training of all involved parties, the integration of psychotherapy in the treatment plan, the creation of a therapeutic milieu and less coercive alternatives to acute psychiatric care were the course of action suggested by patients. In line with this, concerted efforts on the part of patients, their families, clinicians and policy makers should be channelled towards securing strict enforcement of pertinent legislation and advancing patient-centred care.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"41 1","pages":"425 - 436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1409778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
Abstract
ABSTRACT Involuntary hospitalization of people with mental illness raises important ethical and legal concerns worldwide; however, only a handful of studies have investigated the patients’ perspective in depth. The present study aims at exploring patients’ views about the rightfulness of compulsory admission, their experience of hospitalization and potential interventions for reducing its effect in Athens. Fourteen patients who were involuntarily admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the Attica region and had been discharged one month prior to the group discussion, participated in the study. A focus group design drawing on Interpretative Thematic Analysis was employed. The themes that emerged include conflicting attitudes towards the rightfulness of admission, the absence of patient participation in any form of decision-making, substantial infringement of human rights and patients’ dearth of knowledge about them. Therefore, raising awareness initiatives, adequate training of all involved parties, the integration of psychotherapy in the treatment plan, the creation of a therapeutic milieu and less coercive alternatives to acute psychiatric care were the course of action suggested by patients. In line with this, concerted efforts on the part of patients, their families, clinicians and policy makers should be channelled towards securing strict enforcement of pertinent legislation and advancing patient-centred care.
期刊介绍:
This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.