The Antecedents of Comparative Differences in Union Presence and Engagement: Evidence from Coordinated and Liberal Market Contexts

M. Brookes, G. Wood, C. Brewster
{"title":"The Antecedents of Comparative Differences in Union Presence and Engagement: Evidence from Coordinated and Liberal Market Contexts","authors":"M. Brookes, G. Wood, C. Brewster","doi":"10.1080/00208825.2019.1646488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study employs a large on-going survey database to explore the antecedents of comparative differences in union representation and the extent to which employers engage with them at the workplace, and how this has changed over time. It finds that amongst organizations employing more than 100 employees, there has been no uniform decline in the presence of unions, or engagement by employers with them at the workplace. In other words, although we do not measure the range of topics covered or the impact of such engagement, it is clear that neither the neo-liberal nor the more critical theory suggestions that systems are naturally converging to a common model of minimal union presence and engagement receives much support. Collective employment relations are influenced by comparative capitalisms and, to a lesser extent, legal systems and remain a significant feature of many continental European economies.","PeriodicalId":55644,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2019.1646488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study employs a large on-going survey database to explore the antecedents of comparative differences in union representation and the extent to which employers engage with them at the workplace, and how this has changed over time. It finds that amongst organizations employing more than 100 employees, there has been no uniform decline in the presence of unions, or engagement by employers with them at the workplace. In other words, although we do not measure the range of topics covered or the impact of such engagement, it is clear that neither the neo-liberal nor the more critical theory suggestions that systems are naturally converging to a common model of minimal union presence and engagement receives much support. Collective employment relations are influenced by comparative capitalisms and, to a lesser extent, legal systems and remain a significant feature of many continental European economies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工会存在和参与的比较差异的前因:来自协调和自由市场背景的证据
本研究采用了一个大型的持续调查数据库来探索工会代表的比较差异的前因,雇主在工作场所与他们接触的程度,以及这种情况如何随着时间的推移而变化。研究发现,在雇用超过100名员工的组织中,工会的存在或雇主与工会在工作场所的参与度并没有统一下降。换句话说,尽管我们没有衡量所涵盖的主题范围或这种参与的影响,但很明显,无论是新自由主义理论还是更批判性的理论,都认为系统自然地趋同于最小联盟存在和参与的共同模式,都没有得到太多支持。集体雇佣关系受到比较资本主义的影响,并在较小程度上受到法律制度的影响,仍然是许多欧洲大陆经济体的一个重要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
“Homeward bound”: a systematic review of the repatriation literature Orientation and mental representations in the decision-making process: a comparison between junior and senior professional It’s the hierarchy, stupid: Varying perceptions of organizational culture between demographic groups The influence of synchronization of HR and PR practices in developing a strong CSR culture Bringing veganism to the wardrobe: examining consumers’ intention to buy vegan leather
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1