{"title":"Guest Editors' Introduction: Children and Youth in Asian Migration","authors":"R. Parreñas, N. Piper, Sari K. Ishii, C. Choi","doi":"10.1215/10679847-9573315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning in the 1990s, migration scholars in the United States began to pay greater attention to the experiences of youth and the children of migrants. Heeding the call of Portes and Zhou (1993), many looked to the experiences of children to measure the extent of immigrant integration. In contrast, children including young persons have remained largely invisible in studies of migration in Asia (Alipio et al. 2015). Perhaps this is because most do not migrate but instead stay behind in the country of origin as members of transnational families (Beazley and Ball, this issue; Parreñas 2005). It is only in recent years that scholars have begun to focus on the question of youth and children in Asian migration. In 2015, Children’s Geography dedicated a special issue to Asian children and transnational migration, which it identified as comprising four primary groups of leftbehind children of migrant parents, educational migrants, child labor migrants, and adoptees.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"9 1","pages":"219 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-9573315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Beginning in the 1990s, migration scholars in the United States began to pay greater attention to the experiences of youth and the children of migrants. Heeding the call of Portes and Zhou (1993), many looked to the experiences of children to measure the extent of immigrant integration. In contrast, children including young persons have remained largely invisible in studies of migration in Asia (Alipio et al. 2015). Perhaps this is because most do not migrate but instead stay behind in the country of origin as members of transnational families (Beazley and Ball, this issue; Parreñas 2005). It is only in recent years that scholars have begun to focus on the question of youth and children in Asian migration. In 2015, Children’s Geography dedicated a special issue to Asian children and transnational migration, which it identified as comprising four primary groups of leftbehind children of migrant parents, educational migrants, child labor migrants, and adoptees.
从20世纪90年代开始,美国的移民学者开始更加关注青年和移民子女的经历。在Portes和Zhou(1993)的呼吁下,许多人着眼于儿童的经历来衡量移民融合的程度。相比之下,在亚洲的移民研究中,包括年轻人在内的儿童在很大程度上仍然是不可见的(Alipio et al. 2015)。也许这是因为大多数人没有移民,而是作为跨国家庭的成员留在原籍国(Beazley和Ball,这个问题;Parrenas 2005)。直到最近几年,学者们才开始关注亚洲移民中的青少年和儿童问题。2015年,《儿童地理》专门为亚洲儿童和跨国移民撰写了一期特刊,将亚洲儿童和跨国移民划分为四个主要群体:移民父母的留守儿童、教育移民、童工移民和被收养者。