Scaling analysis of the Telegram Open Network blockchain project

IF 0.2 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.30837/rt.2022.2.209.13
V.I. Yukhymenko, O. Fediushyn
{"title":"Scaling analysis of the Telegram Open Network blockchain project","authors":"V.I. Yukhymenko, O. Fediushyn","doi":"10.30837/rt.2022.2.209.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain systems are always distributed but differ greatly in resolutions, sizes, roles, transparency, types of participants, and the way transactions are handled. The decentralized structure offers inalienable security benefits, but with a large number of participants faces the problem of limited scaling. Sharding is suggested to solve this problem. Sharding is a way to divide consensual workload and transactions into several nodes. Effective application of sharding requires a lot of detail and work in terms of architecture and system implementation. As was found in the process of the work, in order to achieve significant results in scaling the blockchain system through sharding, it is necessary that the blockchain project is based on several blockchains simultaneously (i.e. had a multi-blockchain architecture) and provides infrastructure for fast and reliable messaging between them (i.e. strongly interconnected). The Telegram Open Network (TON) and its component TON Blockchain are considered an example of such a project. \nThis work provides a comparative analysis of the most popular blockchain platforms (Bitcoin and Ethereum) with the implementations of TON Blockchain ideas (The Open Network and Everscale) on three parameters: system bandwidth (measured at transactions per second, abbreviated TPS), the average time of a new block’s appearance in the network and projected bandwidth in TPS.","PeriodicalId":41675,"journal":{"name":"Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30837/rt.2022.2.209.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blockchain systems are always distributed but differ greatly in resolutions, sizes, roles, transparency, types of participants, and the way transactions are handled. The decentralized structure offers inalienable security benefits, but with a large number of participants faces the problem of limited scaling. Sharding is suggested to solve this problem. Sharding is a way to divide consensual workload and transactions into several nodes. Effective application of sharding requires a lot of detail and work in terms of architecture and system implementation. As was found in the process of the work, in order to achieve significant results in scaling the blockchain system through sharding, it is necessary that the blockchain project is based on several blockchains simultaneously (i.e. had a multi-blockchain architecture) and provides infrastructure for fast and reliable messaging between them (i.e. strongly interconnected). The Telegram Open Network (TON) and its component TON Blockchain are considered an example of such a project. This work provides a comparative analysis of the most popular blockchain platforms (Bitcoin and Ethereum) with the implementations of TON Blockchain ideas (The Open Network and Everscale) on three parameters: system bandwidth (measured at transactions per second, abbreviated TPS), the average time of a new block’s appearance in the network and projected bandwidth in TPS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telegram Open Network区块链项目的扩容分析
区块链系统始终是分布式的,但在分辨率、规模、角色、透明度、参与者类型和交易处理方式方面存在很大差异。去中心化的结构提供了不可剥夺的安全优势,但由于参与者众多,面临着规模有限的问题。建议使用分片来解决这个问题。分片是一种将双方同意的工作负载和事务划分到多个节点的方法。分片的有效应用需要在架构和系统实现方面进行大量的细节和工作。在工作过程中发现,为了通过分片在扩展区块链系统方面取得显著成果,区块链项目必须同时基于多个区块链(即具有多区块链架构),并为它们之间的快速可靠消息传递提供基础设施(即强互连)。Telegram开放网络(TON)及其组件TON区块链被认为是此类项目的一个例子。这项工作对最流行的区块链平台(比特币和以太坊)与TON区块链理念(开放网络和Everscale)的实现进行了三个参数的比较分析:系统带宽(以每秒交易数衡量,简称TPS),新区块在网络中出现的平均时间和TPS的预计带宽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia
Visnyk NTUU KPI Seriia-Radiotekhnika Radioaparatobuduvannia ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined heat conductive boards with polyimide dielectrics Synthesis and analysis of the trace detector of air objects of an interrogating radar system Creating a call center test bench for load balancing Asterisk servers in a cluster Current state and development trends of class E oscillators: an overview Experimental studies of a lidar emitter built according to the oscillator-amplifier scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1