Reciprocal concessions – compulsory element of a settlement agreement

Alina Gaja
{"title":"Reciprocal concessions – compulsory element of a settlement agreement","authors":"Alina Gaja","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2021.4(246).08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The settlement agreement is an instrument of substantive law, with important intercalations in procedural law, with the aim of amicably preventing a potential dispute or terminating an existing dispute. In order to qualify a civil contract as a settlement agreement, the legislation in force and the doctrine provide certain preconditions and mandatory elements that such an instrument must present. Thus, the purpose of this article is to reveal the binding elements that represent the content of a settlement agreement. In order to elaborate an extensive study, only one of these elements shall be examined, namely the reciprocal concessions made by the parties in order to solve the dispute between them. Mutual concessions belong to the essence of the settlement agreement, as it shows that by solving the conflict amicably, both sides win, as they save time, resources and choose the actual way in which they settle the conflict. In this article we will analyze the concept of reciprocal concessions, the difference between reciprocal concessions and other legal institutions, such as recognition of the action or dismissing the case. Also, we will provide examples of concessions by analyzing the jurisprudence in this regard.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.4(246).08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The settlement agreement is an instrument of substantive law, with important intercalations in procedural law, with the aim of amicably preventing a potential dispute or terminating an existing dispute. In order to qualify a civil contract as a settlement agreement, the legislation in force and the doctrine provide certain preconditions and mandatory elements that such an instrument must present. Thus, the purpose of this article is to reveal the binding elements that represent the content of a settlement agreement. In order to elaborate an extensive study, only one of these elements shall be examined, namely the reciprocal concessions made by the parties in order to solve the dispute between them. Mutual concessions belong to the essence of the settlement agreement, as it shows that by solving the conflict amicably, both sides win, as they save time, resources and choose the actual way in which they settle the conflict. In this article we will analyze the concept of reciprocal concessions, the difference between reciprocal concessions and other legal institutions, such as recognition of the action or dismissing the case. Also, we will provide examples of concessions by analyzing the jurisprudence in this regard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
互惠让步-和解协议的强制性要素
和解协议是实体法文书,在程序法中有重要的插入,目的是友好地防止潜在的争端或终止现有的争端。为了使民事合同有资格成为和解协议,现行立法和理论规定了这种文书必须具备的某些先决条件和强制性要素。因此,本文的目的是揭示代表和解协议内容的具有约束力的要素。为了展开一项广泛的研究,只应审查这些因素中的一个,即各方为解决它们之间的争端而作出的相互让步。相互让步是和解协议的本质,因为它表明,通过友好解决冲突,双方都是赢家,因为他们节省了时间和资源,并选择了他们解决冲突的实际方式。在本文中,我们将分析互惠让步的概念,互惠让步与其他法律制度的区别,如承认行为或驳回案件。此外,我们将通过分析这方面的法理学来提供让步的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aggravating circumstances of the crime of disclosure of state secret Strategies and tactics for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia through the prism of international law Contesting the conclusion of the rejection of the application for lifting the exception of unconstitutionality: the attitude of the Constitutional Court Protection of honor, dignity and business reputation of citizens in international law Translation of legal language and the problem of equivalence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1