A new criterion based on strain determination for dent assessment of pipelines

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpse.2021.11.004
Jian Zhao, Y. Frank Cheng
{"title":"A new criterion based on strain determination for dent assessment of pipelines","authors":"Jian Zhao,&nbsp;Y. Frank Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2021.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dents are one of the most common defects on pipelines and compromise the structural integrity. To date, relevant studies on failure assessment of dented pipelines have been limited, and the existing standard, mainly American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) B31.8, contains major problems, making assessment results not sufficiently accurate and reliable. In this work, a new method based on ductile damage failure indictor (DFDI) criterion combined with improved strain determination by a finite element (FE) model was developed for pipeline dent assessment. Dents with different depths were created by applying a spherical indenter of 100 mm in diameter on a pipe segment of 720 mm in outer diameter and 8.1 mm in pipe wall thickness. The DFDI formula considers the influence of spring-back upon removal of indenter, and the difference between the equivalent strain at dent apex and the maximum equivalent strain at the whole dent area. When the indenter displacement is smaller than 8% of pipe outer diameter, the maximum DFDI can be determined from the equivalent strain at the dent apex. When the initial displacement exceeds 8% of the pipe outer diameter, the maximum equivalent strain at the dent area, which deviates from the dent apex, should be determined by the FE model. Moreover, the limitations of ASME B31.8 in dent assessment were explained.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 18-28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143321000731/pdfft?md5=7cbf8ac3c9355cf127d876110bdbbc2e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667143321000731-main.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143321000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Dents are one of the most common defects on pipelines and compromise the structural integrity. To date, relevant studies on failure assessment of dented pipelines have been limited, and the existing standard, mainly American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME) B31.8, contains major problems, making assessment results not sufficiently accurate and reliable. In this work, a new method based on ductile damage failure indictor (DFDI) criterion combined with improved strain determination by a finite element (FE) model was developed for pipeline dent assessment. Dents with different depths were created by applying a spherical indenter of 100 mm in diameter on a pipe segment of 720 mm in outer diameter and 8.1 mm in pipe wall thickness. The DFDI formula considers the influence of spring-back upon removal of indenter, and the difference between the equivalent strain at dent apex and the maximum equivalent strain at the whole dent area. When the indenter displacement is smaller than 8% of pipe outer diameter, the maximum DFDI can be determined from the equivalent strain at the dent apex. When the initial displacement exceeds 8% of the pipe outer diameter, the maximum equivalent strain at the dent area, which deviates from the dent apex, should be determined by the FE model. Moreover, the limitations of ASME B31.8 in dent assessment were explained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于应变测定的管道凹痕评估新准则
凹痕是管道上最常见的缺陷之一,严重影响管道结构的完整性。目前,关于凹陷管道失效评估的相关研究较少,现有标准主要为美国机械工程学会(ASME) B31.8,存在较大问题,导致评估结果不够准确和可靠。本文提出了一种基于延性损伤失效指标(DFDI)准则与改进的有限元模型应变确定相结合的管道凹痕评估新方法。在外径720 mm、管壁厚8.1 mm的管段上施加直径为100 mm的球形压头,形成不同深度的凹痕。DFDI公式考虑了回弹对压头去除的影响,以及凹痕尖端等效应变与整个凹痕区域最大等效应变之差。当压头位移小于管道外径的8%时,最大DFDI可由凹痕顶点处的等效应变确定。当初始位移超过管道外径的8%时,凹痕区域偏离凹痕顶点处的最大等效应变应由有限元模型确定。此外,还解释了ASME B31.8在凹痕评估中的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Study on scour stripping of oil-wax gels in pipes Development of a sectionalizing method for simulation of large-scale complicated natural gas pipeline networks Corrosion protection characteristics of doped magnetite layers on carbon steel surfaces in aqueous CO2 environments Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1