An Economic Evaluation of the European Union’s 2030 Climate Policy Plan

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Global Business and Finance Review Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.1.1
Thomas R. Sadler
{"title":"An Economic Evaluation of the European Union’s 2030 Climate Policy Plan","authors":"Thomas R. Sadler","doi":"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the European Union’s “Fit for 55” plan, announced in 2021, which intends to meet a 2030 goal of reducing carbon emissions by 55 percent from 1990 levels. \nDesign/methodology/approach: An analytical model is used to assess the impact of the EU environmental policies, including the carbon border tax, emissions trading system, energy efficiency, and emission standards. \nFindings: The study finds that the environmental policies achieve different policy criteria, including cost minimization, equalization of marginal abatement cost, minimization of general equilibrium cost, political feasibility, and minimization of inequitable impacts across income groups. But no single policy instrument is necessarily superior to the others. The paper finds that a revenue-neutral carbon border tax and an emissions trading system with auctioned permits satisfy the most evaluation criteria. \nResearch limitations/implications: For the purpose of simplification, the model ignores dynamic extensions. That is, the adjustments of businesses to policy measures and the effects on emissions are beyond the scope of this analysis. \nOriginality/value: The study develops a model that evaluates the European Union’s environmental policies in a unifying perspective, assessing the tradeoffs of policy design.","PeriodicalId":35226,"journal":{"name":"Global Business and Finance Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business and Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the European Union’s “Fit for 55” plan, announced in 2021, which intends to meet a 2030 goal of reducing carbon emissions by 55 percent from 1990 levels. Design/methodology/approach: An analytical model is used to assess the impact of the EU environmental policies, including the carbon border tax, emissions trading system, energy efficiency, and emission standards. Findings: The study finds that the environmental policies achieve different policy criteria, including cost minimization, equalization of marginal abatement cost, minimization of general equilibrium cost, political feasibility, and minimization of inequitable impacts across income groups. But no single policy instrument is necessarily superior to the others. The paper finds that a revenue-neutral carbon border tax and an emissions trading system with auctioned permits satisfy the most evaluation criteria. Research limitations/implications: For the purpose of simplification, the model ignores dynamic extensions. That is, the adjustments of businesses to policy measures and the effects on emissions are beyond the scope of this analysis. Originality/value: The study develops a model that evaluates the European Union’s environmental policies in a unifying perspective, assessing the tradeoffs of policy design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟2030年气候政策计划的经济评估
目的:这项研究的目的是评估欧盟于2021年宣布的“适合55年”计划,该计划旨在实现2030年的目标,即在1990年的水平上减少55%的碳排放量。设计/方法/方法:使用分析模型来评估欧盟环境政策的影响,包括碳边境税、排放交易体系、能源效率和排放标准。研究发现:环境政策达到了不同的政策标准,包括成本最小化、边际减排成本均等、一般均衡成本最小化、政治可行性和收入群体间不公平影响最小化。但没有哪一种政策工具必然优于其他政策工具。本文发现,收入中性的碳边境税和许可拍卖的排放交易体系最符合评估标准。研究局限/启示:为了简化,模型忽略了动态扩展。也就是说,企业对政策措施的调整以及对排放的影响超出了本文的分析范围。原创性/价值:本研究开发了一个模型,以统一的视角评估欧盟的环境政策,评估政策设计的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Business and Finance Review
Global Business and Finance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Key Attributes of Upcycled Food using a Best-Worst Scaling Approach Impact of Accounting Conservatism on the Informativeness of Current Stock Prices for Future Earnings Mediation Effects of Financial Performance between Assets Utilization and the Market Value of Palestinian Listed Firms Structural Relationship between Taste, Price Fairness, and Repurchase Intention of Fast Food: Moderating Effect of Healthiness The Effects of Enterprise Risk Management on the Performance and Risk of Vietnamese Listed Firms: Evidence from Abnormal Enterprise Risk Management Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1