Force application of laparoscopic surgeons under the impact of heavy personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic

Yao Zhang, Shuyi (Kiana) Wang, Bin Zheng
{"title":"Force application of laparoscopic surgeons under the impact of heavy personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Yao Zhang,&nbsp;Shuyi (Kiana) Wang,&nbsp;Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2022.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Surgeons are required to wear heavy personal protective equipment while delivering care to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the impact of wearing double gloves on surgeons’ performance in laparoscopic surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eleven surgeons-in-training at the Surgical Simulation Research Lab of the University of Alberta were recruited to perform laparoscopic cutting tasks in simulation while wearing none, one pair, and two pairs of surgical gloves. Forces applied to laparoscopic instruments were measured.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Wearing gloves prolonged task times (one pair of gloves: 301.6 ± 61.7 s; two pairs of gloves: 295.8 ± 65.3 s) compared with no gloves (241.7 ± 46.9 s; <em>p =</em> 0.043). Wearing double gloves increased cutting errors (20.4 ± 5.1 mm<sup>2</sup>) compared with wearing one pair of gloves (16.9 ± 5.5 mm<sup>2</sup>) and no gloves (14.4 ± 4.6 mm<sup>2</sup>; <em>p =</em> 0.030). Wearing gloves reduced the peak force (one pair of gloves: 2.4 ± 0.7 N; two pairs of gloves: 2.7 ± 0.6 N; no gloves: 3.4 ± 1.4 N; <em>p</em> = 0.049), and the total force (one pair of gloves: 10.1 ± 2.8 N; two pairs of gloves: 10.3 ± 2.6 N; no glove: 12.6 ± 1.9 N; <em>p</em> = 0.048) delivered onto laparoscopic scissors compared with wearing no glove.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The combined effects of wearing heavy gloves and using tools reduced the touching sensation, which limited the surgeons’ confidence in performing surgical tasks. Increasing practice in simulation is suggested to allow surgeons to overcome difficulties brought by personal protective equipment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000287/pdfft?md5=de774a524703cec989174e968cd4a23c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900922000287-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900922000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

Surgeons are required to wear heavy personal protective equipment while delivering care to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the impact of wearing double gloves on surgeons’ performance in laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

Eleven surgeons-in-training at the Surgical Simulation Research Lab of the University of Alberta were recruited to perform laparoscopic cutting tasks in simulation while wearing none, one pair, and two pairs of surgical gloves. Forces applied to laparoscopic instruments were measured.

Results

Wearing gloves prolonged task times (one pair of gloves: 301.6 ± 61.7 s; two pairs of gloves: 295.8 ± 65.3 s) compared with no gloves (241.7 ± 46.9 s; p = 0.043). Wearing double gloves increased cutting errors (20.4 ± 5.1 mm2) compared with wearing one pair of gloves (16.9 ± 5.5 mm2) and no gloves (14.4 ± 4.6 mm2; p = 0.030). Wearing gloves reduced the peak force (one pair of gloves: 2.4 ± 0.7 N; two pairs of gloves: 2.7 ± 0.6 N; no gloves: 3.4 ± 1.4 N; p = 0.049), and the total force (one pair of gloves: 10.1 ± 2.8 N; two pairs of gloves: 10.3 ± 2.6 N; no glove: 12.6 ± 1.9 N; p = 0.048) delivered onto laparoscopic scissors compared with wearing no glove.

Conclusion

The combined effects of wearing heavy gloves and using tools reduced the touching sensation, which limited the surgeons’ confidence in performing surgical tasks. Increasing practice in simulation is suggested to allow surgeons to overcome difficulties brought by personal protective equipment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间重型个人防护装备冲击下腹腔镜外科医生的强制应用
目的COVID-19大流行期间,外科医生在为患者提供护理时需要穿戴重型个人防护装备。我们研究了在腹腔镜手术中戴双手套对外科医生表现的影响。方法招募加拿大阿尔伯塔大学外科模拟研究实验室的11名实习外科医生,在不戴手术手套、一副手术手套和两副手术手套的情况下进行模拟腹腔镜切割任务。测量施加在腹腔镜器械上的力。结果:发誓手套延长工作时间(单副手套:301.6±61.7 s;两副手套:295.8±65.3秒)与不戴手套(241.7±46.9秒)相比;p = 0.043)。与单手套(16.9±5.5 mm2)和不戴手套(14.4±4.6 mm2)相比,戴双手套的切割误差增加(20.4±5.1 mm2);p = 0.030)。戴手套降低峰值力(一副手套:2.4±0.7 N;2副手套:2.7±0.6 N;无手套:3.4±1.4 N;p = 0.049),总力(一双手套:10.1±2.8 N;两副手套:10.3±2.6 N;无手套:12.6±1.9 N;P = 0.048)。结论戴重手套和使用工具的双重作用降低了患者的触觉,限制了外科医生完成手术任务的信心。建议增加模拟练习,使外科医生能够克服个人防护装备带来的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
期刊最新文献
Gastric leiomyoma presenting as an endophytic growth of cardia of the stomach: A case report A live birth resulting from a fourth cesarean scar pregnancy after combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic uterine repair: A case report and literature review A new abdominal drainage tube fixation method for 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy improves patients’ postoperative quality of life Managerial perspectives of scaling up robotic-assisted surgery in healthcare systems: A systematic literature review Minimally invasive management of parapharyngeal space tumors: Introducing a decision-making algorithm and radiologic tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1