Views of providers and clients on feedback and benefit sharing in studies using biological materials in Eldoret Kenya

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS South African Journal of Bioethics and Law Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.58177/ajb230002
V. Naanyu, E. Kamaara, Alfred Kirui, H. Koros, Daniel K. Lagat, Singh Ilina, E. Kwobah, L. Atwoli
{"title":"Views of providers and clients on feedback and benefit sharing in studies using biological materials in Eldoret Kenya","authors":"V. Naanyu, E. Kamaara, Alfred Kirui, H. Koros, Daniel K. Lagat, Singh Ilina, E. Kwobah, L. Atwoli","doi":"10.58177/ajb230002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context: The use of biological materials raises diverse ethical concerns and there is insufficient research into the views of stakeholders on these concerns.  Aims: This study investigated healthcare providers’ (HCPs) and clients’ perspectives on giving feedback about biological samples that are used in research and sharing of subsequent benefits.  Settings and Design: Using a qualitative in-depth interviewing approach, this study investigated perspectives on feedback and benefit sharing in studies using biological materials. We engaged HCPs (doctors, clinical officers, nurses, and laboratory technicians) and clients from the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya.  Methods and Material: Vignettes and open-ended questions were used, and all sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, then coded and summarized thematically.  Results: We found no substantive differences between the perspectives of HCPs and clients. Participants desired that sample donors were provided with feedback and support for their healthcare. Community-level feedback and initiation of health development projects were viewed as valuable. Participants lauded the global dissemination of findings and sharing of benefits ensuing from the research.  Conclusions: Healthcare providers and clients in Eldoret Kenya appreciate the use of biological materials in research. They believe in feedback and benefit sharing at individual and community levels, and in broad dissemination of the research findings. All research stakeholders should be encouraged to plan and implement contextualized dissemination of research findings. In addition, feedback on research findings and equitable benefit sharing should be strengthened. Key-words: Biological material, research ethics, research benefits, in-depth interviews, Kenya","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58177/ajb230002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Context: The use of biological materials raises diverse ethical concerns and there is insufficient research into the views of stakeholders on these concerns.  Aims: This study investigated healthcare providers’ (HCPs) and clients’ perspectives on giving feedback about biological samples that are used in research and sharing of subsequent benefits.  Settings and Design: Using a qualitative in-depth interviewing approach, this study investigated perspectives on feedback and benefit sharing in studies using biological materials. We engaged HCPs (doctors, clinical officers, nurses, and laboratory technicians) and clients from the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya.  Methods and Material: Vignettes and open-ended questions were used, and all sessions were audio recorded, transcribed, then coded and summarized thematically.  Results: We found no substantive differences between the perspectives of HCPs and clients. Participants desired that sample donors were provided with feedback and support for their healthcare. Community-level feedback and initiation of health development projects were viewed as valuable. Participants lauded the global dissemination of findings and sharing of benefits ensuing from the research.  Conclusions: Healthcare providers and clients in Eldoret Kenya appreciate the use of biological materials in research. They believe in feedback and benefit sharing at individual and community levels, and in broad dissemination of the research findings. All research stakeholders should be encouraged to plan and implement contextualized dissemination of research findings. In addition, feedback on research findings and equitable benefit sharing should be strengthened. Key-words: Biological material, research ethics, research benefits, in-depth interviews, Kenya
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供者和客户对肯尼亚埃尔多雷特使用生物材料的研究的反馈和惠益分享的看法
摘要背景:生物材料的使用引起了各种各样的伦理问题,并且对利益相关者对这些问题的看法的研究不足。目的:本研究调查了医疗保健提供者(HCPs)和客户对用于研究和分享后续利益的生物样品提供反馈的观点。设置和设计:本研究采用定性深入访谈方法,调查了生物材料研究中反馈和利益分享的观点。我们聘请了hcp(医生、临床官员、护士和实验室技术人员)和来自肯尼亚Moi教学和转诊医院的客户。方法和材料:采用小短文和开放式问题,所有的会议录音,转录,然后编码和主题总结。结果:我们发现HCPs和客户的观点没有实质性差异。与会者希望向样本捐献者提供反馈和支持,以促进其保健。社区一级的反馈和卫生发展项目的启动被认为是有价值的。与会者赞扬了研究成果的全球传播和研究成果的利益分享。结论:肯尼亚埃尔多雷特的医疗保健提供者和客户赞赏在研究中使用生物材料。他们相信个人和社区各级的反馈和利益分享,以及广泛传播研究成果。应鼓励所有研究利益相关者规划和实施研究成果的情境化传播。此外,应加强对研究结果的反馈和公平利益分享。关键词:生物材料,研究伦理,研究效益,深度访谈,肯尼亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic ethical approaches to evangelising in the medical encounter The situation in Gaza – will cruelty and hatred triumph? Gaza and international law: The global obligation to protect life and health Is there a legal and ethical duty on doctors to inform patients of the likely co-payment costs should they be treated by practitioners who have contracted out of medical scheme rates? Three to one – an ethicolegal outline of mitochondrial donation in the South African context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1