THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF CEFTRIAXONE AND COMBINATION OF AMPICILLIN-CHLORAMPHENICOL OF CHILDREN WITH PNEUMONIA OF PKU MUHAMMADIYAH HOSPITAL IN BANTUL

Nur Astuti Wulandari, E. Darmawan, Nurcholid Umam Kurniawan
{"title":"THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF CEFTRIAXONE AND COMBINATION OF AMPICILLIN-CHLORAMPHENICOL OF CHILDREN WITH PNEUMONIA OF PKU MUHAMMADIYAH HOSPITAL IN BANTUL","authors":"Nur Astuti Wulandari, E. Darmawan, Nurcholid Umam Kurniawan","doi":"10.55047/comorbid.v1i1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPneumonia is an infectious disease that occurs in the lungs caused by various microorganisms. Patients of children with pneumonia in Indonesia experienced an increase in 2013. Antibiotics therapy is the main therapy for patients with pneumonia. This study aims to compare of the efficacy of ceftriaxone and combination of ampicillin-chloramphenicol of children with pneumonia of PKU Muhammadiyah hospital in Bantul. The study design was a randomized controlled trial with prospective Open trial do in March 2018 to June 2018. The outcomes used were tightness, cough, retraction, temperature, respiration rate, and length of stay. Research data were analyzed using Chi Square test, Fisher test, independent t test and Mann Whitney test. The results of the study of ceftriaxone (n=26) and ampicillin chloramphenicol groups (n=26) showed that the percentage of patients who had not experienced tightness was 82.7%, not cough 7.7%, and there was no retraction of 76.9% with p<0.05. The mean ±SD temperature of the ceftriaxone group was 36.5±0.12 and the ampicillin chloramphenicol group was 36.57±0.09 with a p<0.05. The mea n±SD respiration rate of the ceftriaxone group was 27.9±3.22 and the ampicillin chloramphenicol group was 27.92±2.62 with a p <0.05. The mean ±SD length of stay in the ceftriaxone group was 4.5±0.81 and the ampicillin chloramphenicol group was 4.26±0.66 with a p<0.05. Conclusions showed that there was no significant difference between the effectiveness of ceftriaxone and ampicillin chloramphenicol on fever, spasms, cough, retraction, temperature, respiration rate and length of stay. \n \n \n  \n \n \n  \n","PeriodicalId":19772,"journal":{"name":"PHARMACOLOGY, MEDICAL REPORTS, ORTHOPEDIC, AND ILLNESS DETAILS (COMORBID)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHARMACOLOGY, MEDICAL REPORTS, ORTHOPEDIC, AND ILLNESS DETAILS (COMORBID)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/comorbid.v1i1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pneumonia is an infectious disease that occurs in the lungs caused by various microorganisms. Patients of children with pneumonia in Indonesia experienced an increase in 2013. Antibiotics therapy is the main therapy for patients with pneumonia. This study aims to compare of the efficacy of ceftriaxone and combination of ampicillin-chloramphenicol of children with pneumonia of PKU Muhammadiyah hospital in Bantul. The study design was a randomized controlled trial with prospective Open trial do in March 2018 to June 2018. The outcomes used were tightness, cough, retraction, temperature, respiration rate, and length of stay. Research data were analyzed using Chi Square test, Fisher test, independent t test and Mann Whitney test. The results of the study of ceftriaxone (n=26) and ampicillin chloramphenicol groups (n=26) showed that the percentage of patients who had not experienced tightness was 82.7%, not cough 7.7%, and there was no retraction of 76.9% with p<0.05. The mean ±SD temperature of the ceftriaxone group was 36.5±0.12 and the ampicillin chloramphenicol group was 36.57±0.09 with a p<0.05. The mea n±SD respiration rate of the ceftriaxone group was 27.9±3.22 and the ampicillin chloramphenicol group was 27.92±2.62 with a p <0.05. The mean ±SD length of stay in the ceftriaxone group was 4.5±0.81 and the ampicillin chloramphenicol group was 4.26±0.66 with a p<0.05. Conclusions showed that there was no significant difference between the effectiveness of ceftriaxone and ampicillin chloramphenicol on fever, spasms, cough, retraction, temperature, respiration rate and length of stay.    
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢曲松与氨苄西林-氯霉素联合治疗班图尔市穆罕默德耶医院肺炎患儿疗效比较
肺炎是一种由各种微生物引起的肺部传染病。2013年,印度尼西亚儿童肺炎患者有所增加。抗生素治疗是肺炎患者的主要治疗方法。本研究旨在比较头孢曲松与氨苄西林-氯霉素联合治疗班图尔市PKU Muhammadiyah医院肺炎患儿的疗效。研究设计为随机对照试验,于2018年3月至2018年6月进行前瞻性公开试验。使用的结果是紧绷、咳嗽、收缩、温度、呼吸频率和住院时间。研究资料采用卡方检验、Fisher检验、独立t检验和Mann Whitney检验进行分析。头孢曲松组(n=26)和氨苄西林氯霉素组(n=26)的研究结果显示,未发生紧绷的患者占82.7%,未发生咳嗽的患者占7.7%,未发生内缩的患者占76.9%,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。头孢曲松组平均±SD温度为36.5±0.12,氨苄西林氯霉素组平均±SD温度为36.57±0.09,p<0.05。头孢曲松组平均n±SD呼吸频率为27.9±3.22,氨苄西林氯霉素组平均n±SD呼吸频率为27.92±2.62,p <0.05。头孢曲松组住院时间平均±SD为4.5±0.81,氨苄西林氯霉素组住院时间平均±SD为4.26±0.66,p<0.05。结论头孢曲松与氨苄西林氯霉素在发热、痉挛、咳嗽、收缩、体温、呼吸频率和住院时间方面的疗效无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EFFORTS TO INCREASE PREGNANT WOMEN'S KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY WITH HEALTH EDUCATION DESCRIPTION OF FALL RISK FACTORS ON FALLING INCIDENTS AMONG THE ELDERLY IN THE WORKING AREA OF KRUENG BARONA JAYA HEALTH CENTER DESCRIPTION OF THE UNDERSTANDING AND CONCERN OF CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS FOR EAR HYGIENE, EAR INFECTION AND HEARING HEALTH AT GOVERNMENT SPECIAL SCHOOL II BANJARMASIN LITERATURE REVIEW: PREGNANT WOMEN NUTRITION DURING A PANDEMIC LUNG BULLAE DUE TO SEPTIC PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN A 4-YEAR-OLD CHILD: A CASE REPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1