The Levantine British: Defying Imperial Race Categories in Colonial Alexandria

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY Britain and the World Pub Date : 2019-02-13 DOI:10.3366/BRW.2019.0312
James Whidden
{"title":"The Levantine British: Defying Imperial Race Categories in Colonial Alexandria","authors":"James Whidden","doi":"10.3366/BRW.2019.0312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This treatment of the Levantine British, based on family diaries and consular reports, asks why a British colonial, Michael Barker, exiled from Egypt in 1956, continued to identify with the Alexandria locality. His last wish was to be buried in Alexandria. While the conventional image of the British colony is one shaped by ‘Orientalist’ descriptions of the ‘foreign’ as external to ‘Britishness’, the evidence suggests an enduring identification of members of the colony with the Levantine community of Alexandria. In conventional imperial discourses of the colonial era the ‘Levantine’ had negative connotations; it was a signifier of a loss of British identity and immersion into a culturally different, foreign category. Yet, the memoirs of Michael Barker, as well as consular reports on colonial institutions and the application of the Ottoman Capitulations, indicate that the boundaries of the colony were porous. Official policies insisted on a culturally distinct British identity; however, there are documented instances where the definition of ‘Britishness’ was widened to include the ‘Levantine’. The Levantine identification of Michael Barker had political ramifications, apparent in his family's decision to remain in Egypt when others emigrated out, to continue to invest in the Egyptian economy when others divested, to enable the emigration of Levantine British to British territories after Egyptian independence, and to cling to the remnants of symbols of belonging to Alexandria, the very last of which was the family tomb. That act memorialized colonial lives that stood in marked contrast to the ascendant narratives of nation and empire.","PeriodicalId":53867,"journal":{"name":"Britain and the World","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britain and the World","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/BRW.2019.0312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This treatment of the Levantine British, based on family diaries and consular reports, asks why a British colonial, Michael Barker, exiled from Egypt in 1956, continued to identify with the Alexandria locality. His last wish was to be buried in Alexandria. While the conventional image of the British colony is one shaped by ‘Orientalist’ descriptions of the ‘foreign’ as external to ‘Britishness’, the evidence suggests an enduring identification of members of the colony with the Levantine community of Alexandria. In conventional imperial discourses of the colonial era the ‘Levantine’ had negative connotations; it was a signifier of a loss of British identity and immersion into a culturally different, foreign category. Yet, the memoirs of Michael Barker, as well as consular reports on colonial institutions and the application of the Ottoman Capitulations, indicate that the boundaries of the colony were porous. Official policies insisted on a culturally distinct British identity; however, there are documented instances where the definition of ‘Britishness’ was widened to include the ‘Levantine’. The Levantine identification of Michael Barker had political ramifications, apparent in his family's decision to remain in Egypt when others emigrated out, to continue to invest in the Egyptian economy when others divested, to enable the emigration of Levantine British to British territories after Egyptian independence, and to cling to the remnants of symbols of belonging to Alexandria, the very last of which was the family tomb. That act memorialized colonial lives that stood in marked contrast to the ascendant narratives of nation and empire.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黎凡特不列颠人:在亚历山大殖民地反抗帝国种族分类
这本以家庭日记和领事报告为基础的对黎凡特英国人的论述,提出了一个问题,为什么1956年从埃及流亡的英国殖民者迈克尔·巴克(Michael Barker)继续认同亚历山大地区。他最后的愿望是被埋葬在亚历山大。虽然英国殖民地的传统形象是由“东方主义者”对“外国”的描述塑造的,这些描述是对“英国性”的外部描述,但有证据表明,殖民地成员与亚历山大的黎凡特社区有着持久的认同。在殖民时代的传统帝国话语中,“黎凡特人”具有负面含义;它象征着英国身份的丧失,以及对文化不同的外国类别的沉浸。然而,迈克尔·巴克(Michael Barker)的回忆录,以及有关殖民机构和《奥斯曼投降协定》适用情况的领事报告都表明,殖民地的边界是漏洞百出的。官方政策坚持文化上独特的英国身份;然而,有文献记载的例子表明,“英国人”的定义被扩大到包括“黎凡特人”。迈克尔·巴克的黎凡特身份有政治上的影响,他的家人决定在其他人移居国外时留在埃及,在其他人撤离时继续投资埃及经济,使黎凡特英国人在埃及独立后移民到英国领土,并坚持属于亚历山大的残余象征,最后一个是家族坟墓。这一行为纪念了殖民时期的生活,与国家和帝国的崛起叙事形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Contesting an Elastic Constitution: British Nationality and Protection in the Mandates Beyond God, Country, and Empire: The United Kingdom and the Transnational Turn in the First World War In Mutual Recognition of the Value of Seapower: Anglo-American Unity and the Destroyers Transferred Under the Destroyers-for-Bases Deal Lusaka: New Capital and the Imperial Garden City Movement Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1