Methodological Assessment of Data Suitability for Defect Prediction

Peter Schlegel, Daniel Buschmann, Max Ellerich, R. Schmitt
{"title":"Methodological Assessment of Data Suitability for Defect Prediction","authors":"Peter Schlegel, Daniel Buschmann, Max Ellerich, R. Schmitt","doi":"10.12776/qip.v24i2.1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper provides a domain specific concept to assess data suitability of various data sources along the production chain for defect prediction. Methodology/Approach: A seven-phase methodology is developed in which the data suitability for defect prediction in interlinked production steps is assessed. For this purpose, the manufacturing process is mapped and potential influencing variables on the origin of defects are identified. The available data is evaluated and quantified with regard to the criteria relevancy, completeness, appropriate amount of data, accessibility and interpretability. The individual assessments are then visualized in an overview, gaps in data acquisition are identified and needs for action are derived. Findings: The research shows a seven-phase methodology to systematically assess data suitability for defect prediction and identify data gaps in interlinked production steps. Research Limitation/implication: This research is limited to the analysis of contextual data quality for the use case of defect prediction. Other data analytics applications or processes outside of manufacturing are not included. Originality/Value of paper: The paper provides a new approach to identify gaps in data acquisition by systematically assessing data suitability for defect prediction and deducting needs for action. The accuracy of predictive defect models is then to be improved by the subsequent optimization of the data basis.","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"8 1","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v24i2.1443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: This paper provides a domain specific concept to assess data suitability of various data sources along the production chain for defect prediction. Methodology/Approach: A seven-phase methodology is developed in which the data suitability for defect prediction in interlinked production steps is assessed. For this purpose, the manufacturing process is mapped and potential influencing variables on the origin of defects are identified. The available data is evaluated and quantified with regard to the criteria relevancy, completeness, appropriate amount of data, accessibility and interpretability. The individual assessments are then visualized in an overview, gaps in data acquisition are identified and needs for action are derived. Findings: The research shows a seven-phase methodology to systematically assess data suitability for defect prediction and identify data gaps in interlinked production steps. Research Limitation/implication: This research is limited to the analysis of contextual data quality for the use case of defect prediction. Other data analytics applications or processes outside of manufacturing are not included. Originality/Value of paper: The paper provides a new approach to identify gaps in data acquisition by systematically assessing data suitability for defect prediction and deducting needs for action. The accuracy of predictive defect models is then to be improved by the subsequent optimization of the data basis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺陷预测数据适用性的方法学评估
目的:本文提供了一个领域特定的概念来评估沿着生产链的各种数据源的数据适用性,以进行缺陷预测。方法论/方法:开发了一个七阶段的方法论,其中评估了相互关联的生产步骤中缺陷预测的数据适用性。为此,对制造过程进行了映射,并对缺陷起源的潜在影响变量进行了识别。根据相关性、完整性、数据的适当数量、可访问性和可解释性等标准对现有数据进行评价和量化。然后在概述中将个别评估可视化,确定数据获取方面的差距,并得出采取行动的需要。研究结果:该研究显示了一个七阶段的方法来系统地评估缺陷预测的数据适用性,并识别相互关联的生产步骤中的数据缺口。研究限制/含义:本研究仅限于缺陷预测用例的上下文数据质量分析。制造业之外的其他数据分析应用程序或流程不包括在内。论文的原创性/价值:本文提供了一种新的方法,通过系统地评估数据对缺陷预测的适用性和推断行动需求来识别数据获取中的差距。然后通过对数据基础的后续优化来提高预测缺陷模型的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking of the e-Learning Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training: Project Results Mapping the Accidents and Unsafe Conditions of Workers in the Automotive Sector Developing a Systematic and Practical Road Map for Implementing Quality 4.0 Quality 4.0 in Digital Manufacturing – Example of Good Practice Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1