Probiotic Properties of Lactobacilli that could be Used Against Periodontitis

J. Samot, H. Belkhelfa, L. Haddioui, C. Badet
{"title":"Probiotic Properties of Lactobacilli that could be Used Against Periodontitis","authors":"J. Samot, H. Belkhelfa, L. Haddioui, C. Badet","doi":"10.4172/2329-8901.1000180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial competitiveness appears to be an efficient way to fight pathogenic oral flora. This competition may be facilitated by probiotics, particularly in periodontal diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the probiotic properties of 61 clinical isolates of oral lactobacilli. The inhibitory activity of the tested strains against periodontopathogens was assessed with the agar overlay technique. The results obtained, as well as those resulting from previous work, led us to select the nine most promising strains on which we conducted further tests, such as evaluating their coaggregation capacities with various oral species and the production of proinflammatory cytokines by PBMC. We also evaluated the safety of the probiotics by assessing their sensitivity to antibiotics. Their possible involvement in halitosis was investigated by testing their ability to produce volatile sulfur compounds. The results of the agar overlay technique showed that all the lactobacilli strains had an antibacterial activity against Tanerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Fifty-two strains slightly inhibited the growth of P gingivalis and only two had no activity on F. nucleatum. The nine strains tested did not coaggregate with P gingivalis, T forsythia, T denticola or A actinomycetemcomitans. Three strains strongly coaggregated with F nucleatum. Only three strains produced lower IL-6 than the activator at the maximum concentration tested in this study. However, none of the 9 strains produced a greater amount of IL-8 than that obtained with 1 μg/ml of LPS. These results show us that all the strains were sensitive to the antibiotics tested, except for one strain which showed resistance to penicillin. The production of CSV by the strains remained below the threshold of halitosis. Among the 61 strains tested, 9 proved to be of interest including one that was particularly promising.","PeriodicalId":16865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Probiotics & Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Probiotics & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8901.1000180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Bacterial competitiveness appears to be an efficient way to fight pathogenic oral flora. This competition may be facilitated by probiotics, particularly in periodontal diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the probiotic properties of 61 clinical isolates of oral lactobacilli. The inhibitory activity of the tested strains against periodontopathogens was assessed with the agar overlay technique. The results obtained, as well as those resulting from previous work, led us to select the nine most promising strains on which we conducted further tests, such as evaluating their coaggregation capacities with various oral species and the production of proinflammatory cytokines by PBMC. We also evaluated the safety of the probiotics by assessing their sensitivity to antibiotics. Their possible involvement in halitosis was investigated by testing their ability to produce volatile sulfur compounds. The results of the agar overlay technique showed that all the lactobacilli strains had an antibacterial activity against Tanerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Fifty-two strains slightly inhibited the growth of P gingivalis and only two had no activity on F. nucleatum. The nine strains tested did not coaggregate with P gingivalis, T forsythia, T denticola or A actinomycetemcomitans. Three strains strongly coaggregated with F nucleatum. Only three strains produced lower IL-6 than the activator at the maximum concentration tested in this study. However, none of the 9 strains produced a greater amount of IL-8 than that obtained with 1 μg/ml of LPS. These results show us that all the strains were sensitive to the antibiotics tested, except for one strain which showed resistance to penicillin. The production of CSV by the strains remained below the threshold of halitosis. Among the 61 strains tested, 9 proved to be of interest including one that was particularly promising.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳酸菌抗牙周炎的益生菌特性研究
细菌竞争似乎是对抗致病性口腔菌群的有效途径。益生菌可以促进这种竞争,特别是在牙周病中。本研究旨在探讨61株口腔乳酸菌临床分离株的益生菌特性。用琼脂覆盖法测定菌株对牙周病原的抑制活性。获得的结果,以及之前工作的结果,使我们选择了9个最有希望的菌株,我们进行了进一步的测试,例如评估它们与各种口腔物种的共聚集能力以及PBMC产生促炎细胞因子。我们还通过评估益生菌对抗生素的敏感性来评估其安全性。通过测试它们产生挥发性硫化合物的能力,研究了它们可能与口臭有关的问题。琼脂覆盖技术结果表明,所有乳酸菌菌株对连翘Tanerella、密螺旋体denticola和放线菌聚集杆菌comitans均有抗菌活性。52株菌株对牙龈卟啉单胞菌有轻微抑制作用,只有2株对具核单胞菌无抑制作用。9株被试菌与牙龈P、连翘T、齿状T和放线菌不共聚集。三株菌株与具核F胞体强烈聚集。在本研究测试的最大浓度下,只有3株菌株产生的IL-6低于激活剂。然而,9株菌株的IL-8含量均未高于LPS处理1 μg/ml的菌株。结果表明,除1株对青霉素耐药外,其余菌株均对所测抗生素敏感。菌株产生的CSV仍低于口臭的阈值。在测试的61种菌株中,有9种被证明是值得关注的,包括一种特别有希望的菌株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bacillus Bacteria as Probiotics The Industry Originated Probiotic Bacteria Role in COVID-19 The Evaluation of the Effects of Orange Juice on the Microflora, Haematologyand Selected Organs of Albino Rats Antibiotic Resistance in Lactic Acid Bacteria The Role of Dietary Fiber and Microbiome Composition to Decrease theDeleterious Effects of Nano-Plastic in Monogastric Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1