Stefan Gulan, S. Johr, R. Kretschmer, Stefan Rieger, M. Ditze
{"title":"Graphical modelling meets formal methods","authors":"Stefan Gulan, S. Johr, R. Kretschmer, Stefan Rieger, M. Ditze","doi":"10.1109/INDIN.2013.6622972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The graphical modelling languages UML and SysML, nowadays widely used in industry, integrate different modelling concepts and notations in one standardised framework. However, they lack a clearly defined, unambiguous semantics and thus their formal verification represents a challenge. On the other hand, current safety standards, including ISO 26262, demand such verification especially for safety-relevant systems. The literature proposes a plethora of different semantics and formalisms for UML/SysML. In this paper we compare and summarise existing work on the formalisation of behavioural UML and SysML models and their verification. Our goal is to foster a better understanding of the problems related to UML/SysML formalisation, and to aid people bridging the gap from high level graphical modelling to formal verification techniques.","PeriodicalId":6312,"journal":{"name":"2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","volume":"6 3 1","pages":"716-721"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2013.6622972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The graphical modelling languages UML and SysML, nowadays widely used in industry, integrate different modelling concepts and notations in one standardised framework. However, they lack a clearly defined, unambiguous semantics and thus their formal verification represents a challenge. On the other hand, current safety standards, including ISO 26262, demand such verification especially for safety-relevant systems. The literature proposes a plethora of different semantics and formalisms for UML/SysML. In this paper we compare and summarise existing work on the formalisation of behavioural UML and SysML models and their verification. Our goal is to foster a better understanding of the problems related to UML/SysML formalisation, and to aid people bridging the gap from high level graphical modelling to formal verification techniques.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
