Hysteria, head injuries and heredity: ‘shell-shocked’ soldiers of the Royal Edinburgh Asylum, Edinburgh (1914–24)

Joanna Park, Louise Neilson, A. Demetriades
{"title":"Hysteria, head injuries and heredity: ‘shell-shocked’ soldiers of the Royal Edinburgh Asylum, Edinburgh (1914–24)","authors":"Joanna Park, Louise Neilson, A. Demetriades","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2021.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project illustrates as-yet-uncharted psychiatric patients from the Royal Edinburgh Asylum (REA) around the time of World War I, predominantly ‘shell-shocked’ soldiers. Primary patient notes help to elucidate definitions, symptoms and perceptions of ‘shell-shock’, in addition to its links with other psychiatric conditions. This includes general paralysis of the insane (GPI), alcohol excess, mania and melancholia. Whereas the majority of these patients were suffering from shell-shock, it is not once explicitly listed as a diagnosis; it was a term whose use was discouraged by the War Office and key medical experts from 1916 onwards. As such, this paper demonstrates effects that canonical views held by the War Office and military psychiatrists on shell-shock aetiology had on language used in psychiatric patient notes. The results corroborate wartime views that mental distress due to a physical head injury was preferable to shell-shock without obvious cause; that neurasthenia was a more desirable diagnostic label than hysteria; and that mental illness was predominantly due to an inherited flaw in someone's character. Language used by psychiatrists to describe their patients was influenced by contemporary perspectives on gender, class and mental illness. More broadly, this paper adds to discussions about definitions and symptomatology of shell-shock that are being uncovered in historical patient notes from this period.","PeriodicalId":82881,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania notes and records","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania notes and records","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2021.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project illustrates as-yet-uncharted psychiatric patients from the Royal Edinburgh Asylum (REA) around the time of World War I, predominantly ‘shell-shocked’ soldiers. Primary patient notes help to elucidate definitions, symptoms and perceptions of ‘shell-shock’, in addition to its links with other psychiatric conditions. This includes general paralysis of the insane (GPI), alcohol excess, mania and melancholia. Whereas the majority of these patients were suffering from shell-shock, it is not once explicitly listed as a diagnosis; it was a term whose use was discouraged by the War Office and key medical experts from 1916 onwards. As such, this paper demonstrates effects that canonical views held by the War Office and military psychiatrists on shell-shock aetiology had on language used in psychiatric patient notes. The results corroborate wartime views that mental distress due to a physical head injury was preferable to shell-shock without obvious cause; that neurasthenia was a more desirable diagnostic label than hysteria; and that mental illness was predominantly due to an inherited flaw in someone's character. Language used by psychiatrists to describe their patients was influenced by contemporary perspectives on gender, class and mental illness. More broadly, this paper adds to discussions about definitions and symptomatology of shell-shock that are being uncovered in historical patient notes from this period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歇斯底里、头部受伤和遗传:爱丁堡皇家爱丁堡收容所的“炮弹休克”士兵(1914 - 1924)
这个项目描绘了第一次世界大战期间来自皇家爱丁堡收容所(REA)的未知精神病患者,主要是“炮弹休克”士兵。病人的原始记录有助于阐明“炮弹休克”的定义、症状和感知,以及它与其他精神疾病的联系。这包括精神麻痹(GPI)、酒精过量、躁狂和忧郁症。尽管这些患者中的大多数患有炮弹休克症,但它从未被明确列为一种诊断;从1916年起,陆军部和主要医学专家都不鼓励使用这个词。因此,本文证明了陆军部和军事精神病学家对炮弹休克病因学的规范观点对精神病人笔记中使用的语言的影响。结果证实了战时的观点,即由于身体头部损伤造成的精神痛苦比没有明显原因的炮弹休克更可取;神经衰弱是一个比歇斯底里更理想的诊断标签;这种精神疾病主要是由于某人性格上的遗传缺陷。精神科医生用来描述病人的语言受到当时对性别、阶级和精神疾病的看法的影响。更广泛地说,本文增加了关于定义和症状学的讨论,这些定义和症状学是在这一时期的历史病人笔记中发现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ‘seductive scientist’: the emergence of a new persona centred on virility and joy in twentieth-century scientific memoirs The making of a naturalist in Manchuria: Arthur de Carle Sowerby, 1885–1922 Making science for the Portuguese Empire: The Royal Maritime, Military and Geographic Society (1798–1809) Redhead, Paroissien, Parish & Co.: British Field Science in early Independent Río de la Plata Sympathetic Organizations: body, mind, and society in Robert Whytt and David Hume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1