Estimating Earnings Adjustment Frictions: Method and Evidence from the Social Security Earnings Test

Alexander M. Gelber, Damon Jones, Daniel W. Sacks
{"title":"Estimating Earnings Adjustment Frictions: Method and Evidence from the Social Security Earnings Test","authors":"Alexander M. Gelber, Damon Jones, Daniel W. Sacks","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2487382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study frictions in adjusting earnings in response to changes in the Social Security Annual Earnings Test (AET), using a panel of Social Security Administration microdata on one percent of the U.S. population from 1961 to 2006. Individuals continue to \"bunch\" at the convex kink the AET creates even when they are no longer subject to the AET, demonstrating that adjustment frictions help drive behavior in a new and important context. We develop a novel framework for estimating an earnings elasticity and an adjustment cost using information on the amount of bunching at kinks before and after policy changes in earnings incentives around the kinks. We apply this method in settings in which individuals face changes in the AET benefit reduction rate, and we estimate in a baseline case that the earnings elasticity with respect to the implicit net-of-tax share is 0.23, and the fixed cost of adjustment is $152.08. Our results demonstrate that the short-run impact of changes in the effective marginal tax rate can be substantially attenuated.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee benefits journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2487382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

We study frictions in adjusting earnings in response to changes in the Social Security Annual Earnings Test (AET), using a panel of Social Security Administration microdata on one percent of the U.S. population from 1961 to 2006. Individuals continue to "bunch" at the convex kink the AET creates even when they are no longer subject to the AET, demonstrating that adjustment frictions help drive behavior in a new and important context. We develop a novel framework for estimating an earnings elasticity and an adjustment cost using information on the amount of bunching at kinks before and after policy changes in earnings incentives around the kinks. We apply this method in settings in which individuals face changes in the AET benefit reduction rate, and we estimate in a baseline case that the earnings elasticity with respect to the implicit net-of-tax share is 0.23, and the fixed cost of adjustment is $152.08. Our results demonstrate that the short-run impact of changes in the effective marginal tax rate can be substantially attenuated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估算盈余调整摩擦:来自社会保障盈余检验的方法和证据
我们研究了根据社会保障年度收入测试(AET)的变化调整收入的摩擦,使用了1961年至2006年美国1%人口的社会保障管理局微观数据小组。即使个体不再受AET的约束,他们也会继续在AET产生的凸结处“聚集”,这表明调整摩擦有助于在新的重要环境中驱动行为。我们开发了一个新的框架来估计收益弹性和调整成本,使用的信息是在扭结周围的收益激励政策变化之前和之后在扭结处聚集的数量。我们将这种方法应用于个人面临AET福利减少率变化的环境中,我们估计在基线情况下,相对于隐性净税份额的收入弹性为0.23,调整的固定成本为152.08美元。我们的研究结果表明,有效边际税率变化的短期影响可以大大减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Proposal for Taking the Complexities Out of Taxing U.S. Retirement Distributions to Foreign Nationals Do Social Movements Spur Corporate Change? The Rise of “MeToo Termination Rights” in CEO Contracts Rules of Medical Necessity Does Employee Ownership Reduce Strike Risk? Evidence from U.S. Union Elections All that Glitters Is not Gold. Effects of Working from Home on Income Inequality at the Time of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1