Commentary: Nationalism and Transnationalism in Anthropological Research

Q1 Arts and Humanities Perspectives on Science Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI:10.1162/posc_e_00407
S. de Chadarevian
{"title":"Commentary: Nationalism and Transnationalism in Anthropological Research","authors":"S. de Chadarevian","doi":"10.1162/posc_e_00407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of physical anthropology has most often been situated and studied in the context of specific colonial powers and nation states. At the same time, the study of human variation had as its scope to study human evolution on a global scale. It thus necessarily included transnational border crossings and scholarly exchanges of specimen collections that allowed researchers to study migration and differentiation patterns on a large scale. In addition, scientists working in a national context often sought international approval to validate their findings and gain national standing. The set of essays collected in this special issue takes this tension between national, transnational, and global impulses in the anthropological and genetic study of human differences as the central theme. The cases studies presented consider a broad range of imperial powers and nation states and cover the interwar period up to the Cold War. Together, they make a series of important interventions in respect to both the historiography of the anthropological sciences, broadly construed, and to current reflections on transnational approaches in the history of science and technology. Written mostly by young scholars in the field, the special issue bears witness to the renewed interest in and the vibrancy of the history of physical anthropology at a time of a general reckoning with widespread institutional racism and racial inequalities around the world. At first sight, it might be surprising that although the studies aim to address the transnational aspect of anthropological research, the starting point in nearly all essays is a national frame. The geographical breadth is broad and reaches beyond the main colonial powers. The collection comprises essays on racial blood group research and nation building in Greece in the interwar years; on the Norwegian Association for Heredity Research in the same period; on the efforts to establish international standards for","PeriodicalId":19867,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science","volume":"32 1","pages":"194-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_e_00407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of physical anthropology has most often been situated and studied in the context of specific colonial powers and nation states. At the same time, the study of human variation had as its scope to study human evolution on a global scale. It thus necessarily included transnational border crossings and scholarly exchanges of specimen collections that allowed researchers to study migration and differentiation patterns on a large scale. In addition, scientists working in a national context often sought international approval to validate their findings and gain national standing. The set of essays collected in this special issue takes this tension between national, transnational, and global impulses in the anthropological and genetic study of human differences as the central theme. The cases studies presented consider a broad range of imperial powers and nation states and cover the interwar period up to the Cold War. Together, they make a series of important interventions in respect to both the historiography of the anthropological sciences, broadly construed, and to current reflections on transnational approaches in the history of science and technology. Written mostly by young scholars in the field, the special issue bears witness to the renewed interest in and the vibrancy of the history of physical anthropology at a time of a general reckoning with widespread institutional racism and racial inequalities around the world. At first sight, it might be surprising that although the studies aim to address the transnational aspect of anthropological research, the starting point in nearly all essays is a national frame. The geographical breadth is broad and reaches beyond the main colonial powers. The collection comprises essays on racial blood group research and nation building in Greece in the interwar years; on the Norwegian Association for Heredity Research in the same period; on the efforts to establish international standards for
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论:人类学研究中的民族主义与跨国主义
体质人类学的历史通常被置于特定的殖民势力和民族国家的背景下进行研究。同时,人类变异研究的范围是在全球范围内研究人类进化。因此,它必然包括跨国过境和标本收集的学术交流,使研究人员能够大规模地研究迁徙和分化模式。此外,在国家背景下工作的科学家经常寻求国际认可,以验证他们的发现并获得国家地位。本特刊中收集的论文集以人类差异的人类学和遗传学研究中国家、跨国和全球冲动之间的紧张关系为中心主题。所提出的案例研究考虑了广泛的帝国权力和民族国家,涵盖了两次世界大战之间的时期,直到冷战。总之,他们在人类学史学方面做出了一系列重要的干预,广泛地解释,以及对科学技术史中跨国方法的当前反思。这期特刊主要由该领域的年轻学者撰写,见证了在对世界各地普遍存在的制度性种族主义和种族不平等进行普遍清算的时候,人们对体质人类学历史重新产生的兴趣和活力。乍一看,可能令人惊讶的是,尽管这些研究旨在解决人类学研究的跨国方面,但几乎所有论文的起点都是一个国家框架。地理范围很广,超越了主要的殖民大国。该文集包括关于两次世界大战期间希腊种族血统研究和国家建设的论文;关于同期挪威遗传研究协会的情况;努力建立国际标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Science
Perspectives on Science Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Emancipation from Metaphysics? Natural History, Natural Philosophy and the Study of Nature from the Late Renaissance to the Enlightenment The Racialization of Killer Whales: An Application of Gene-Culture Coevolutionary Theory Preface: Virtual Entities in Science Conflicting results and statistical malleability: embracing pluralism of empirical results Between mind and body? Psychoneuroimmunology, psychology, and cognitive science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1