Palatability of high-quality New Zealand grass-finished and American grain-finished beef strip steaks

L. Lucherk, T. O’Quinn, J. Legako, S. Shackelford, J. Brooks, Mark F. Miller
{"title":"Palatability of high-quality New Zealand grass-finished and American grain-finished beef strip steaks","authors":"L. Lucherk, T. O’Quinn, J. Legako, S. Shackelford, J. Brooks, Mark F. Miller","doi":"10.22175/mmb.12601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to evaluate palatability of strip loin steaks from grass- and grain-fed beef across five United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) quality grades and three wet aging periods. Beef strip loins (N = 200; 20 per USDA quality grade/fed cattle type) representing five USDA quality grades [USDA Prime, Top Choice (Average and High Choice), Low Choice, Select and Standard] and two fed cattle types [New Zealand grass-finished and United States (U.S.) grain-finished] were used in the study. Each strip loin was equally portioned into thirds and randomly assigned to one of three wet aging periods (7 d, 21 d or 42 d). Consumer panelists (N = 600; 120/location: Texas, California, Florida, Kansas, and Pennsylvania) evaluated eight grilled beef steak samples for palatability traits, acceptability, and eating quality. All palatability traits were impacted by the interaction of diet × quality grade (P < 0.05). Although similar (P > 0.05) to grass-fed Prime steaks for juiciness, tenderness and overall liking, grain-fed Prime steaks rated greater (P < 0.05) than all other grass- and grain-finished treatments for all palatability attributes. Grass-finished Top Choice, Low Choice, and Standard steaks were rated greater (P < 0.05) than the respective grain-finished quality grades for juiciness and tenderness. Grain-finished Standard steaks rated lower (P < 0.05) than all other grass- and grain-finished treatments for juiciness, tenderness, and overall liking; but were similar (P > 0.05) to grass-finished Standard steaks for flavor liking. Our results indicate beef strip loin steaks of similar quality grades from grass-finished New Zealand cattle produce similar eating experiences when compared to those from U.S. grain-finished beef, even following extended post-mortem aging. This indicates improved palatability for consumers based on marbling without respect to grass- or grain-finishing diets. ","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.12601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate palatability of strip loin steaks from grass- and grain-fed beef across five United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) quality grades and three wet aging periods. Beef strip loins (N = 200; 20 per USDA quality grade/fed cattle type) representing five USDA quality grades [USDA Prime, Top Choice (Average and High Choice), Low Choice, Select and Standard] and two fed cattle types [New Zealand grass-finished and United States (U.S.) grain-finished] were used in the study. Each strip loin was equally portioned into thirds and randomly assigned to one of three wet aging periods (7 d, 21 d or 42 d). Consumer panelists (N = 600; 120/location: Texas, California, Florida, Kansas, and Pennsylvania) evaluated eight grilled beef steak samples for palatability traits, acceptability, and eating quality. All palatability traits were impacted by the interaction of diet × quality grade (P < 0.05). Although similar (P > 0.05) to grass-fed Prime steaks for juiciness, tenderness and overall liking, grain-fed Prime steaks rated greater (P < 0.05) than all other grass- and grain-finished treatments for all palatability attributes. Grass-finished Top Choice, Low Choice, and Standard steaks were rated greater (P < 0.05) than the respective grain-finished quality grades for juiciness and tenderness. Grain-finished Standard steaks rated lower (P < 0.05) than all other grass- and grain-finished treatments for juiciness, tenderness, and overall liking; but were similar (P > 0.05) to grass-finished Standard steaks for flavor liking. Our results indicate beef strip loin steaks of similar quality grades from grass-finished New Zealand cattle produce similar eating experiences when compared to those from U.S. grain-finished beef, even following extended post-mortem aging. This indicates improved palatability for consumers based on marbling without respect to grass- or grain-finishing diets. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高品质新西兰草加工牛肉和美国谷物加工牛肉的适口性
本研究的目的是通过美国农业部(USDA)的五个质量等级和三个湿老化期来评估草饲和谷物饲牛肉的里脊牛排的适口性。牛里脊肉(N = 200;每20头美国农业部质量等级/饲料牛类型)代表美国农业部的五个质量等级[美国农业部优质,顶级(平均和高选择),低选择,精选和标准]和两种饲料牛类型[新西兰草肥牛和美国(美国)谷物肥牛]被用于研究。每条长腰肉被平均分成三份,随机分配到三个湿老化期(7天、21天或42天)中的一个。120/地点:德克萨斯州、加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、堪萨斯州和宾夕法尼亚州)评估了8个烤牛排样品的适口性、可接受性和食用质量。饲粮与品质等级的交互作用对各适口性状均有显著影响(P < 0.05)。粗饲牛排的多汁性、嫩度和总体喜爱度与草饲牛排相似(P > 0.05),但在所有适口性指标上,粗饲牛排均高于其他草饲和粮饲处理(P < 0.05)。“上等”、“低级”和“标准”肉排的多汁性和嫩度评分均高于各自的籽粒肥育品质等级(P < 0.05)。粗粮肥育标准牛排的多汁性、嫩度和总体喜欢度低于所有其他粗粮肥育处理(P < 0.05);风味偏好与草肥标准牛排相近(P > 0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,与美国谷物加工牛肉相比,来自新西兰草肉牛的类似质量等级的牛里脊牛排产生了相似的食用体验,即使经过长时间的死后老化。这表明,与草或谷物育肥性饲粮相比,大理石花纹饲粮改善了消费者的适口性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 17698 Characterization of Pork Loin Chop Color Stability Using Loin Quality Traits and Instrumental Discoloration Measures Supranutritional Supplementation of Vitamin E Influences Myoglobin Post-Translational Modifications in Postmortem Beef Longissimus Lumborum Muscle Determination of the impact of labeling terms on consumer sensory evaluation Product yield and color of fresh beef transported at different refrigerated temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1