Determining the Placental-Birth Weight Ratio at Term at the Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, North-Central Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

P. Eka, T. Swende, A. Ojabo, B. Utoo, A. A. Ornguze, S. K. Hembah Hilekaan
{"title":"Determining the Placental-Birth Weight Ratio at Term at the Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi, North-Central Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"P. Eka, T. Swende, A. Ojabo, B. Utoo, A. A. Ornguze, S. K. Hembah Hilekaan","doi":"10.9734/bpi/idhr/v1/7484d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The birth weight of a neonate depends mainly on optimal placental growth and function in utero. Measurement of the placental weight, the neonatal birth weight and the placenta-birth weight ratio is an indirect way of assessing this vital relationship. This underscores the significance of placental weight as a major determinant of neonatal weight.\nObjective: To determine the placental weight, birth weight and placental- birth weight ratio in a cross-section of subjects attending our antenatal clinic\nMethodology: This was a clinic-based cross-sectional study from July 31, 2015 to June 30, 2017. Four hundred and forty-four (444) subjects attending our antenatal clinic were recruited through systematic random sampling. The placental weights and birth weights were measured within one hour of delivery using a table –top beam weighing scale. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 20.0 and significance set at a P-value of <0.05.\nResults: Four hundred and forty-four subjects (whose mean age was 28.75 years, mean parity was 1.5 and mean gestational age at delivery was 38.70 weeks) participated in the study. The mean placental weight was 670 g, the mean birth weight was 3300 g and the mean placental-birth weight ratio (PBWR) was 20.3. Two hundred and eighteen (49.1%) of the neonates were male and 226(50.9%) were female. There was a positive correlation between the placental weight and the placental-birth weight ratio(X2 = 108.570; p-value = 0.001). There was a progressive decline in the PBWR with gestational age at term.\nConclusion: The placental weight increased with the birth weight and the gestational age. The placenta-birth weight ratio declined progressively with gestational age.","PeriodicalId":14672,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 1","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/idhr/v1/7484d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The birth weight of a neonate depends mainly on optimal placental growth and function in utero. Measurement of the placental weight, the neonatal birth weight and the placenta-birth weight ratio is an indirect way of assessing this vital relationship. This underscores the significance of placental weight as a major determinant of neonatal weight. Objective: To determine the placental weight, birth weight and placental- birth weight ratio in a cross-section of subjects attending our antenatal clinic Methodology: This was a clinic-based cross-sectional study from July 31, 2015 to June 30, 2017. Four hundred and forty-four (444) subjects attending our antenatal clinic were recruited through systematic random sampling. The placental weights and birth weights were measured within one hour of delivery using a table –top beam weighing scale. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 20.0 and significance set at a P-value of <0.05. Results: Four hundred and forty-four subjects (whose mean age was 28.75 years, mean parity was 1.5 and mean gestational age at delivery was 38.70 weeks) participated in the study. The mean placental weight was 670 g, the mean birth weight was 3300 g and the mean placental-birth weight ratio (PBWR) was 20.3. Two hundred and eighteen (49.1%) of the neonates were male and 226(50.9%) were female. There was a positive correlation between the placental weight and the placental-birth weight ratio(X2 = 108.570; p-value = 0.001). There was a progressive decline in the PBWR with gestational age at term. Conclusion: The placental weight increased with the birth weight and the gestational age. The placenta-birth weight ratio declined progressively with gestational age.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚中北部马库尔迪贝努埃州立大学教学医院足月胎盘出生体重比测定:一项横断面研究
背景:新生儿的出生体重主要取决于子宫内胎盘的最佳生长和功能。测量胎盘重量,新生儿体重和胎盘出生体重比是评估这一重要关系的间接方法。这强调了胎盘重量作为新生儿体重的主要决定因素的重要性。目的:确定参加产前临床的受试者的胎盘重量、出生重量和胎盘出生重量比。方法:这是一项基于临床的横断面研究,时间为2015年7月31日至2017年6月30日。采用系统随机抽样的方法,共招募444名产前门诊患者。胎盘重量和出生体重在分娩后一小时内用台式横梁称重秤测量。采用SPSS 20.0版本进行统计学分析,p值<0.05。结果:共纳入444例研究对象,平均年龄28.75岁,平均胎次1.5次,平均分娩胎龄38.70周。平均胎盘重670 g,平均出生重3300 g,平均胎重比20.3。新生儿中男性218例(49.1%),女性226例(50.9%)。胎盘重与胎盘出生重比呈正相关(X2 = 108.570;p值= 0.001)。随着足月胎龄的增加,PBWR逐渐下降。结论:胎盘重量随出生体重和胎龄的增加而增加。胎盘出生重量比随胎龄逐渐下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Progressing Quality Care Process Metrics for Public Health Nursing: An Approach towards Modified Delphi Study on Mammographic Breast Pattern in Postmenopausal Women in Ibadan, South-Western Nigeria Determination of EBV Serology and Plasma EBV DNA Load as a Combined Tool for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Diagnosis Analysis of the Effect of Long-Term Electric Field Treatment on the Spatial Configuration of Fatty Acids in Raw Avocado Oil (Persea americana Mill var. Hass) Preformulation Studies for Generic Omeprazole Magnesium Enteric Coated Tablets: Advance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1