Integrating Process Simulation Modeling and Predictive Analytics to Gain Deeper Insights into Machine Health and Performance

R. Homji, Akshay Bhardwaj
{"title":"Integrating Process Simulation Modeling and Predictive Analytics to Gain Deeper Insights into Machine Health and Performance","authors":"R. Homji, Akshay Bhardwaj","doi":"10.2118/197529-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The efficacy of machine learning (ML) algorithms for turbomachinery condition monitoring can be compromised by the lack of robust historical data for training. While unsupervised or deep learning (DL) algorithms may be used when sufficient volumes of ‘labeled’ data are unavailable, they offer limited insights into detected anomalies or outliers. Additionally, the inherent dependency on data volume and variety delays the deployment of these algorithms, making an ML-only approach unsuitable for situations such as a machine's first operating run.\n The paper discusses how a combination approach utilizing both first-principle based performance algorithms and ML algorithms can address several shortcomings of the ML-only approach. Examples are provided to demonstrate that one type of algorithm can outperform the other in the detection of specific anomalies. Therefore, when deployed in parallel, they provide the ability to predict / detect a larger universe of machine faults. The combination approach can also address the lack of interpretability inherent to ML algorithms in cases wherein both sets of algorithms show anomalous behavior.\n To further address the issue of data inadequacy and poor data quality, the concept of simulation-based transfer learning is introduced. A thermodynamic simulation model is used to generate performance data for a multistage, variable composition centrifugal pump. This data is then used to train two deep stateful LSTM neural network models to predict pump discharge pressure. In the first model only simulation data is used for training while for the second model both simulation and historical data are used.\n Prediction results from both models are compared with those from a performance algorithm and an LSTM model trained solely on historical data. Test results demonstrate that the LSTM model trained on both simulation and historical data outperforms the other algorithms. This methodology can be applied successfully to accelerate the deployment and enhance the value of deep learning algorithms for machine performance analysis. An additional benefit of training the model on simulated data derived from well proven thermodynamic/aerodynamic principles, is that the insightfulness of performance algorithms may be ‘inherited’ by the deep learning algorithms.","PeriodicalId":11328,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 14, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197529-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of machine learning (ML) algorithms for turbomachinery condition monitoring can be compromised by the lack of robust historical data for training. While unsupervised or deep learning (DL) algorithms may be used when sufficient volumes of ‘labeled’ data are unavailable, they offer limited insights into detected anomalies or outliers. Additionally, the inherent dependency on data volume and variety delays the deployment of these algorithms, making an ML-only approach unsuitable for situations such as a machine's first operating run. The paper discusses how a combination approach utilizing both first-principle based performance algorithms and ML algorithms can address several shortcomings of the ML-only approach. Examples are provided to demonstrate that one type of algorithm can outperform the other in the detection of specific anomalies. Therefore, when deployed in parallel, they provide the ability to predict / detect a larger universe of machine faults. The combination approach can also address the lack of interpretability inherent to ML algorithms in cases wherein both sets of algorithms show anomalous behavior. To further address the issue of data inadequacy and poor data quality, the concept of simulation-based transfer learning is introduced. A thermodynamic simulation model is used to generate performance data for a multistage, variable composition centrifugal pump. This data is then used to train two deep stateful LSTM neural network models to predict pump discharge pressure. In the first model only simulation data is used for training while for the second model both simulation and historical data are used. Prediction results from both models are compared with those from a performance algorithm and an LSTM model trained solely on historical data. Test results demonstrate that the LSTM model trained on both simulation and historical data outperforms the other algorithms. This methodology can be applied successfully to accelerate the deployment and enhance the value of deep learning algorithms for machine performance analysis. An additional benefit of training the model on simulated data derived from well proven thermodynamic/aerodynamic principles, is that the insightfulness of performance algorithms may be ‘inherited’ by the deep learning algorithms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集成过程仿真建模和预测分析,以获得对机器健康和性能的更深入的见解
由于缺乏可靠的训练历史数据,机器学习(ML)算法在涡轮机械状态监测中的有效性可能会受到影响。虽然在没有足够数量的“标记”数据时可以使用无监督或深度学习(DL)算法,但它们对检测到的异常或异常值的见解有限。此外,对数据量和种类的固有依赖延迟了这些算法的部署,使得仅使用ml的方法不适合机器首次运行等情况。本文讨论了如何利用基于第一性原理的性能算法和ML算法的组合方法来解决仅ML方法的几个缺点。实例表明,一种算法在特定异常的检测中优于另一种算法。因此,当并行部署时,它们提供了预测/检测更大范围机器故障的能力。组合方法还可以解决在两组算法都显示异常行为的情况下ML算法固有的可解释性缺乏的问题。为了进一步解决数据不足和数据质量差的问题,引入了基于模拟的迁移学习的概念。采用热力学模拟模型对多级可变成分离心泵进行了性能模拟。然后使用这些数据训练两个深度状态LSTM神经网络模型来预测泵排出压力。在第一个模型中,只使用仿真数据进行训练,而在第二个模型中,同时使用仿真和历史数据。将两种模型的预测结果与性能算法和仅基于历史数据训练的LSTM模型的预测结果进行了比较。测试结果表明,LSTM模型在仿真和历史数据上的训练都优于其他算法。这种方法可以成功地应用于加速部署和提高深度学习算法在机器性能分析中的价值。在经过验证的热力学/空气动力学原理的模拟数据上训练模型的另一个好处是,性能算法的洞察力可能会被深度学习算法“继承”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of bag-of-features (BoF) technique for weed management in sugarcane production Spraying deposits using different nozzles and application volumes for pest management of cotton at reproductive stage Opioid Prescription in Switzerland: Appropriate Comedication use in Cancer and Noncancer Pain Co-Development Aspects of Super Giant Reservoirs With Condensate-Rich Gas Cap Healing Total Losses and Establishing Well Integrity with Engineered Fiber-Based Lost Circulation Control Spacer During Primary Cementing in UAE Offshore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1