Engineering Criticality Assessments of Floating Offshore Platforms Based on Time Domain Structural Response Analysis

J. O’Donnell, J. Kyoung, Sagar Samaria, A. Sablok
{"title":"Engineering Criticality Assessments of Floating Offshore Platforms Based on Time Domain Structural Response Analysis","authors":"J. O’Donnell, J. Kyoung, Sagar Samaria, A. Sablok","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-63796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a time-domain S-N fatigue analysis and an approach to reliable and robust engineering criticality assessments to supplement or provide an alternative to S-N fatigue assessments of offshore platform structures based on time domain structural response analysis. It also provides recommendations for industry standards to improve guidance for structural integrity assessments of offshore platforms using fracture mechanics.\n Demand continues to grow in the offshore industry to attain value from captured operational data for a number of purposes, including the reduction of uncertainties in structural integrity assessments during design and over the operational lifetime of floating offshore platforms. Recent advances in time domain structural analysis technology demonstrate substantially more accurate assessments of non-linear platform loadings and responses with enhanced computational efficiency. The current S-N approach for fatigue design and integrity assessments calculates a fatigue damage factor that does not address how loading occurs over time (ABS, DNVGL-RP-C203).\n For the present study, engineering criticality assessments (ECAs) based on fracture mechanics theory (BS 7910) are applied utilizing time-domain loading information theory. The ECA returns the smallest initial flaws that can grow to a critical size during a design lifetime, which can serve as an indicator of acceptability during design, a technical basis for in-service inspection intervals and facilitates asset integrity and life extension assessments. Critical initial flaws are calculated using the Paris Law (BS 7910) and cumulative fatigue crack growth in two ways: with and without an integrated and consistent check for fracture instability. The results are compared with those from S-N fatigue analyses and recommendations are provided.","PeriodicalId":23502,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-63796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a time-domain S-N fatigue analysis and an approach to reliable and robust engineering criticality assessments to supplement or provide an alternative to S-N fatigue assessments of offshore platform structures based on time domain structural response analysis. It also provides recommendations for industry standards to improve guidance for structural integrity assessments of offshore platforms using fracture mechanics. Demand continues to grow in the offshore industry to attain value from captured operational data for a number of purposes, including the reduction of uncertainties in structural integrity assessments during design and over the operational lifetime of floating offshore platforms. Recent advances in time domain structural analysis technology demonstrate substantially more accurate assessments of non-linear platform loadings and responses with enhanced computational efficiency. The current S-N approach for fatigue design and integrity assessments calculates a fatigue damage factor that does not address how loading occurs over time (ABS, DNVGL-RP-C203). For the present study, engineering criticality assessments (ECAs) based on fracture mechanics theory (BS 7910) are applied utilizing time-domain loading information theory. The ECA returns the smallest initial flaws that can grow to a critical size during a design lifetime, which can serve as an indicator of acceptability during design, a technical basis for in-service inspection intervals and facilitates asset integrity and life extension assessments. Critical initial flaws are calculated using the Paris Law (BS 7910) and cumulative fatigue crack growth in two ways: with and without an integrated and consistent check for fracture instability. The results are compared with those from S-N fatigue analyses and recommendations are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于时域结构响应分析的海上浮式平台工程临界性评估
本文提出了一种时域S-N疲劳分析方法,以及一种可靠、稳健的工程临界评估方法,以补充或提供基于时域结构响应分析的海上平台结构S-N疲劳评估的替代方法。它还为行业标准提供了建议,以改进使用断裂力学对海上平台结构完整性评估的指导。海上工业的需求持续增长,从捕获的操作数据中获取价值,用于多种目的,包括减少浮式海上平台在设计和使用寿命期间结构完整性评估的不确定性。时域结构分析技术的最新进展表明,随着计算效率的提高,非线性平台载荷和响应的评估更加准确。目前用于疲劳设计和完整性评估的S-N方法计算的疲劳损伤系数并没有考虑载荷随时间的变化(ABS, DNVGL-RP-C203)。基于断裂力学理论(BS 7910),利用时域载荷信息理论进行工程临界性评价。ECA返回最小的初始缺陷,这些缺陷可以在设计生命周期内增长到临界尺寸,这可以作为设计期间可接受性的指标,是在役检查间隔的技术基础,并促进资产完整性和寿命延长评估。关键初始缺陷的计算采用巴黎定律(BS 7910)和累积疲劳裂纹扩展两种方式:有和没有断裂不稳定性的综合和一致的检查。并与S-N疲劳分析结果进行了比较,提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of the Inertial Components in Modal State Covariances Prelude FLNG Free Weathervaning Heading Prediction and Uncertainties, Based on Machine Learning Model Applying Open Web Architectures Towards Collaborative Maritime Design and Simulation Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Predicting Wave Impact Dynamic Response of a Generic Self-Elevating Unit in Operation With Hull in Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1