Quality assurance in supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic: empirical evidence on organisational resilience of conformity assessment bodies

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.1080/14783363.2022.2078189
Mona Mirtsch, C. Koch, Parsa Asna Ashari, K. Blind, Pavel Castka
{"title":"Quality assurance in supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic: empirical evidence on organisational resilience of conformity assessment bodies","authors":"Mona Mirtsch, C. Koch, Parsa Asna Ashari, K. Blind, Pavel Castka","doi":"10.1080/14783363.2022.2078189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global supply chains rely on the compliance and safety of their products, processes, and facilities. These vital services (often referred to as ‘quality assurance’ or ‘conformity assessment’ services) are provided by Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs). This empirical study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CABs as well as their response to the resulting challenges. Data was gathered through an online survey among all accredited CABs in Germany, which resulted in 555 valid responses. Taking a resilience perspective, we reveal that CABs were hit hard by the disruptions caused by the pandemic, albeit to different degrees, in part due to their type of services, size, and sectors served. Furthermore, we find that contingency plans do not directly cushion order declines (as the main indicator of the economic impact of the pandemic) but rather indirectly through helping CABs respond more quickly, which in turn mitigates their order declines. However, our results show that contingency plans can also have adverse effects if they hinder flexible reaction to the crisis. The findings of our study help managers and policymakers learn from the COVID-19 pandemic and improve the resilience of the conformity assessment sector and quality assurance in the event of future crises.","PeriodicalId":23149,"journal":{"name":"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence","volume":"1 1","pages":"615 - 636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2078189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Global supply chains rely on the compliance and safety of their products, processes, and facilities. These vital services (often referred to as ‘quality assurance’ or ‘conformity assessment’ services) are provided by Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs). This empirical study explores the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CABs as well as their response to the resulting challenges. Data was gathered through an online survey among all accredited CABs in Germany, which resulted in 555 valid responses. Taking a resilience perspective, we reveal that CABs were hit hard by the disruptions caused by the pandemic, albeit to different degrees, in part due to their type of services, size, and sectors served. Furthermore, we find that contingency plans do not directly cushion order declines (as the main indicator of the economic impact of the pandemic) but rather indirectly through helping CABs respond more quickly, which in turn mitigates their order declines. However, our results show that contingency plans can also have adverse effects if they hinder flexible reaction to the crisis. The findings of our study help managers and policymakers learn from the COVID-19 pandemic and improve the resilience of the conformity assessment sector and quality assurance in the event of future crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间供应链的质量保证:关于合格评定机构组织弹性的经验证据
全球供应链依赖于其产品、流程和设施的合规性和安全性。这些重要的服务(通常称为“质量保证”或“合格评定”服务)由合格评定机构(cab)提供。本实证研究探讨了COVID-19大流行对cab的影响,以及它们如何应对由此带来的挑战。数据是通过对德国所有认证的cab进行在线调查收集的,共收到555份有效回复。从恢复力的角度来看,我们发现,cab受到大流行造成的中断的严重打击,尽管程度不同,部分原因在于它们的服务类型、规模和服务部门。此外,我们发现应急计划不能直接缓冲订单下降(作为大流行经济影响的主要指标),而是通过帮助cab更快地做出反应来间接缓解订单下降,从而减轻其订单下降。然而,我们的研究结果表明,如果应急计划阻碍了对危机的灵活反应,也会产生不利影响。我们的研究结果有助于管理者和政策制定者从2019冠状病毒病大流行中吸取教训,提高合格评定部门和质量保证部门在未来发生危机时的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Total Quality Management & Business Excellence is an international journal which sets out to stimulate thought and research in all aspects of total quality management and to provide a natural forum for discussion and dissemination of research results. The journal is designed to encourage interest in all matters relating to total quality management and is intended to appeal to both the academic and professional community working in this area. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence is the culture of an organization committed to customer satisfaction through continuous improvement. This culture varies both from one country to another and between different industries, but has certain essential principles which can be implemented to secure greater market share, increased profits and reduced costs. The journal provides up-to-date research, consultancy work and case studies right across the whole field including quality culture, quality strategy, quality systems, tools and techniques of total quality management and the implementation in both the manufacturing and service sectors. No topics relating to total quality management are excluded from consideration in order to develop business excellence.
期刊最新文献
Does social media contribute to research impact? An Altmetric study of highly-cited marketing research A survey on ISO 9001 decertified companies: the three stages leading to withdrawal Cloud PLM adoption: a multiple perspectives approach Effects of perceived benefit on online rental service customer behavior Effect of top management team attention to digital transformation on innovation activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1