Beyond the Nobel Prize: scientific recognition and awards in North America since 1900

N. Hansson, T. Schlich
{"title":"Beyond the Nobel Prize: scientific recognition and awards in North America since 1900","authors":"N. Hansson, T. Schlich","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are various ways to assess the accomplishment and recognition of researchers in medicine and the life sciences, but the most visible form of scientific honour is an award. Awards and prizes are listed in CVs, grant proposals or job applications as a sign of excellence. Along with other markers, such as keynote lectures, major grants and citations, awards and prizes provide evidence of scientific recognition and prestige, even of academic celebrity. There are also quantitative measures of excellence, for example the Hirsch Index, which is based on citations. These play important roles when the progress and impact of individual scholars is being evaluated—for example, in academic promotion committees. Such citation metrics have been a growing field of interdisciplinary research for decades (even with their own journals, such as Scientometrics). By contrast, our understanding of prize cultures and their dynamics, in different countries or in specific fields, has remained surprisingly poor. This Special Issue is thematically grouped around prizes as presumptive parameters for excellence and impact. As scholars have shown, the number of prizes in the sciences and in medicine has increased considerably since the 1980s. There seems to be such an oversaturation of prizes that few experts maintain an overview of the ‘prize landscape’, even in their own field. This is true on the international arena, too: renowned prizes in one country are often unknown elsewhere. Only few scientific awards are celebrated around the globe among both scientists and laymen. With the following articles, we wish to explore cultures of scientific credit and academic excellence in medicine in North America since the turn of the twentieth century and to discuss the more general question of the functions and motives of prizes, the mechanisms of awarding them and the contexts in which some individuals become potential candidates. This Special Issue thus aims at describing and understanding the social and cultural mechanisms to be found in prize competitions. It","PeriodicalId":82881,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania notes and records","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania notes and records","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are various ways to assess the accomplishment and recognition of researchers in medicine and the life sciences, but the most visible form of scientific honour is an award. Awards and prizes are listed in CVs, grant proposals or job applications as a sign of excellence. Along with other markers, such as keynote lectures, major grants and citations, awards and prizes provide evidence of scientific recognition and prestige, even of academic celebrity. There are also quantitative measures of excellence, for example the Hirsch Index, which is based on citations. These play important roles when the progress and impact of individual scholars is being evaluated—for example, in academic promotion committees. Such citation metrics have been a growing field of interdisciplinary research for decades (even with their own journals, such as Scientometrics). By contrast, our understanding of prize cultures and their dynamics, in different countries or in specific fields, has remained surprisingly poor. This Special Issue is thematically grouped around prizes as presumptive parameters for excellence and impact. As scholars have shown, the number of prizes in the sciences and in medicine has increased considerably since the 1980s. There seems to be such an oversaturation of prizes that few experts maintain an overview of the ‘prize landscape’, even in their own field. This is true on the international arena, too: renowned prizes in one country are often unknown elsewhere. Only few scientific awards are celebrated around the globe among both scientists and laymen. With the following articles, we wish to explore cultures of scientific credit and academic excellence in medicine in North America since the turn of the twentieth century and to discuss the more general question of the functions and motives of prizes, the mechanisms of awarding them and the contexts in which some individuals become potential candidates. This Special Issue thus aims at describing and understanding the social and cultural mechanisms to be found in prize competitions. It
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越诺贝尔奖:自1900年以来北美的科学认可和奖项
评估医学和生命科学研究人员的成就和认可有多种方式,但最明显的科学荣誉形式是奖项。奖励和奖品都列在简历、拨款申请或工作申请中,作为优秀的标志。与其他标志一样,如主题演讲、重大资助和引用,奖项和奖品提供了科学认可和声望的证据,甚至是学术名人。还有衡量优秀程度的量化指标,比如赫希指数(Hirsch Index),它是基于引用的。在评估个别学者的进步和影响时,例如在学术推广委员会中,这些机构发挥着重要作用。几十年来,这样的引文指标一直是一个不断发展的跨学科研究领域(即使是他们自己的期刊,比如科学计量学)。相比之下,我们对不同国家或特定领域的奖励文化及其动态的理解却出奇地贫乏。本期特刊的主题是围绕奖项作为卓越和影响力的假定参数进行分组。正如学者们所表明的那样,自20世纪80年代以来,科学和医学领域的奖项数量大幅增加。奖项似乎过于饱和,以至于很少有专家对“奖项格局”进行概述,即使是在他们自己的领域。在国际舞台上也是如此:一个国家的著名奖项在其他地方往往不为人知。只有很少的科学奖项在全球范围内受到科学家和非专业人士的庆祝。通过以下文章,我们希望探索自20世纪之交以来北美医学科学信用和学术卓越的文化,并讨论更普遍的问题,如奖项的功能和动机、授予机制以及一些个人成为潜在候选人的背景。因此,本期特刊旨在描述和理解有奖比赛中的社会和文化机制。它
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ‘seductive scientist’: the emergence of a new persona centred on virility and joy in twentieth-century scientific memoirs The making of a naturalist in Manchuria: Arthur de Carle Sowerby, 1885–1922 Making science for the Portuguese Empire: The Royal Maritime, Military and Geographic Society (1798–1809) Redhead, Paroissien, Parish & Co.: British Field Science in early Independent Río de la Plata Sympathetic Organizations: body, mind, and society in Robert Whytt and David Hume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1