STEM FACULTY MEMBERS’ PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES TOWARDS DISTANCE LEARNING AND VIRTUAL CLASSES DURING COVID-19 OUTBREAK

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17718/tojde.958068
A. Bawaneh, E. Malkawi
{"title":"STEM FACULTY MEMBERS’ PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES TOWARDS DISTANCE LEARNING AND VIRTUAL CLASSES DURING COVID-19 OUTBREAK","authors":"A. Bawaneh, E. Malkawi","doi":"10.17718/tojde.958068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims at investigating the STEM faculty members’ perspectives and challenges towards distance learning and virtual classes during the COVID-19 outbreak. The results are compared with those of non-STEM faculty members from the same institution. Data collection was performed at the United Arab Emirates University because of four demographic independent variables: Faculty Gender, Experience, Academic Rank, and Academic Track. The researchers adopted and implemented a questionnaire where its validity and reliability for collecting data have been verified. Mean, standard deviations, and one-way ANOVA tests were conducted. The results indicate that the overall faculty members’ perspectives towards distance learning and virtual classes and tracks (STEM, and humanities, and social sciences) are Medium. \nThe results do not show a significant difference at the level (α = 0.05) for the independent variables: gender, and experience. However, we observe significant differences in the academic track and academic rank. We notice some significant differences in favor of full professors and associate professors as compared to lecturers. We also observe some significant differences between STEM and non-STEM tracks in favor of the former one. The results show that the calculated means for the challenges in using distance learning and virtual classes for the STEM, and humanities and social sciences tracks are Weak. This indicates that there are no apparent challenges that hinder the effort in teaching. The results do not show a significant difference at the level (α = 0.05) for all independent variables: faculty gender, experience, academic rank, and academic track. The study concluded with few recommendations. The university should continue supporting the current efforts to provide all the teaching and learning requirements via distance learning and virtual classes such as suitable infrastructure, internet, smart apps, and technical support. There is always a need for continuous updates of the teaching and learning platforms in line with ongoing development and training for instructors and students.","PeriodicalId":46002,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.958068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study aims at investigating the STEM faculty members’ perspectives and challenges towards distance learning and virtual classes during the COVID-19 outbreak. The results are compared with those of non-STEM faculty members from the same institution. Data collection was performed at the United Arab Emirates University because of four demographic independent variables: Faculty Gender, Experience, Academic Rank, and Academic Track. The researchers adopted and implemented a questionnaire where its validity and reliability for collecting data have been verified. Mean, standard deviations, and one-way ANOVA tests were conducted. The results indicate that the overall faculty members’ perspectives towards distance learning and virtual classes and tracks (STEM, and humanities, and social sciences) are Medium. The results do not show a significant difference at the level (α = 0.05) for the independent variables: gender, and experience. However, we observe significant differences in the academic track and academic rank. We notice some significant differences in favor of full professors and associate professors as compared to lecturers. We also observe some significant differences between STEM and non-STEM tracks in favor of the former one. The results show that the calculated means for the challenges in using distance learning and virtual classes for the STEM, and humanities and social sciences tracks are Weak. This indicates that there are no apparent challenges that hinder the effort in teaching. The results do not show a significant difference at the level (α = 0.05) for all independent variables: faculty gender, experience, academic rank, and academic track. The study concluded with few recommendations. The university should continue supporting the current efforts to provide all the teaching and learning requirements via distance learning and virtual classes such as suitable infrastructure, internet, smart apps, and technical support. There is always a need for continuous updates of the teaching and learning platforms in line with ongoing development and training for instructors and students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在COVID-19爆发期间,Stem教师对远程学习和虚拟课程的看法和挑战
该研究旨在调查STEM教师在2019冠状病毒病爆发期间对远程学习和虚拟课程的看法和挑战。结果与来自同一机构的非stem教师的结果进行了比较。数据收集是在阿拉伯联合酋长国大学进行的,因为有四个人口统计学独立变量:教师性别、经验、学术排名和学术轨迹。研究人员采用并实施了问卷调查,其收集数据的有效性和可靠性已得到验证。进行了均值、标准差和单因素方差分析检验。结果表明,全体教师对远程学习和虚拟课程(STEM、人文科学和社会科学)的看法是中等的。结果显示,自变量:性别和经验在水平上没有显著差异(α = 0.05)。然而,我们观察到学术轨迹和学术排名的显著差异。我们注意到,与讲师相比,人们对正教授和副教授的青睐程度存在一些显著差异。我们还观察到STEM和非STEM轨道之间存在显著差异,有利于前者。结果表明,在STEM、人文和社会科学课程中使用远程学习和虚拟课程所面临的挑战的计算均值较弱。这表明没有明显的挑战阻碍了教学的努力。各自变量:教师性别、经验、学术等级、学术轨迹均无显著差异(α = 0.05)。这项研究几乎没有提出什么建议。大学应该继续支持目前的努力,通过远程学习和虚拟课程,如合适的基础设施、互联网、智能应用程序和技术支持,提供所有的教学和学习需求。始终需要不断更新教学和学习平台,以配合教师和学生的持续发展和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE) is a peer-reviewed quarterly e-journal. International in scope, this scholarly e-journal publishes refereed articles focusing on the issues and challenges of providing theory, research and information services to global learners in any kind of distance education or open learning applications. TOJDE will particularly strive to meet the continuing education needs of practitioners and educators by providing a forum for the discussion of extended learning strategies, policies and practices, and trends in information technology as they impact the delivery of student support services for distance learners and faculties.
期刊最新文献
ANTECEDENTS TO THE UNDERPRIVILEGED UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' INTENTION TO PARTICIPATE IN ONLINE CLASSES HOW DO HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS OFFER ONLINE COURSES FOR ON-CAMPUS STUDENTS? PULL AND PUSH FACTORS INFLUENCING THEIR DECISIONS THE DETERMINATION OF THE SENSE OF COMMUNITY LEVELS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ONLINE DISTANCE EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTS IN TERMS OF DIFFERENT VARIABLES INVESTIGATING TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES WITH DIGITAL CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT AND INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON GRADUATE STUDENTS IN THE PHILIPPINES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1