Conceptual models of the playfulness construct: Additive, balanced, or synergistic?

L. Barnett
{"title":"Conceptual models of the playfulness construct: Additive, balanced, or synergistic?","authors":"L. Barnett","doi":"10.31296/AOP.V2I7.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four conceptual models and measures of adult playfulness were investigated and compared. Each proffers different constitutive dimensions underlying the construct, and argues that the explanation for playfulness lies within the independent or relative contributions of the dimensions, or in their interactive relationship. 646 undergraduate university students with complete data on all four measures, as well as on a self-rated criterion assessment, participated in the study. The findings indicated the extent to which each model was best regarded as an additive, balanced, or synergistic relationship, and further revealed their differential efficacy and predictive power in capturing and elucidating the adult playfulness construct. An alternative model is proposed in which the most powerful predictors are synthesized. Contributions toward an increased understanding of playfulness in young adults were identified from the collation of results and their competing hypotheses, and directions for the trajectory of further research utilizing the conceptual frameworks were presented.  ","PeriodicalId":92173,"journal":{"name":"Archives of psychology (Chicago, Ill.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of psychology (Chicago, Ill.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31296/AOP.V2I7.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Four conceptual models and measures of adult playfulness were investigated and compared. Each proffers different constitutive dimensions underlying the construct, and argues that the explanation for playfulness lies within the independent or relative contributions of the dimensions, or in their interactive relationship. 646 undergraduate university students with complete data on all four measures, as well as on a self-rated criterion assessment, participated in the study. The findings indicated the extent to which each model was best regarded as an additive, balanced, or synergistic relationship, and further revealed their differential efficacy and predictive power in capturing and elucidating the adult playfulness construct. An alternative model is proposed in which the most powerful predictors are synthesized. Contributions toward an increased understanding of playfulness in young adults were identified from the collation of results and their competing hypotheses, and directions for the trajectory of further research utilizing the conceptual frameworks were presented.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可玩性结构的概念模型:加性、平衡性还是协同性?
对成人游戏性的四种概念模型和测量方法进行了研究和比较。每一个都提供了不同的构成维度,并认为对游戏性的解释在于维度的独立或相对贡献,或在它们的互动关系中。646名本科生参加了这项研究,他们在所有四项指标以及自评标准评估方面都有完整的数据。研究结果表明,每种模型在多大程度上被视为一种加法、平衡或协同关系,并进一步揭示了它们在捕捉和阐明成人游戏性结构方面的不同功效和预测能力。提出了一种替代模型,其中综合了最强大的预测因子。从结果的整理和相互竞争的假设中确定了对增加对年轻人玩耍的理解的贡献,并提出了利用概念框架进一步研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of the In vivo program on salivary cortisol and internalized symptoms of adolescents: a multiple case pilot study Affect Intolerance is Associated with Insecure Attachment and Reduced Self-Esteem in Adults A Primer on Reliability via Coefficient Alpha and Omega Manage Stress to Tackle Mental Health Problems in the Workplace A comparison between the Bayesian parametric and the semiparametric approach in estimating nonpolynomial instantaneous indirect effect in the Structural Equation Model with ordinal data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1