The Spotify Paradox: How the Creation of a Compulsory License Scheme for Streaming On-Demand Music Services Can Save the Music Industry

Q3 Social Sciences Interactive Entertainment Law Review Pub Date : 2014-11-05 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2557709
James H. Richardson
{"title":"The Spotify Paradox: How the Creation of a Compulsory License Scheme for Streaming On-Demand Music Services Can Save the Music Industry","authors":"James H. Richardson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2557709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digitalization of digital media has repeatedly forced Copyright Law to address cutting edge issues of Law. The Digital Performance in Sound Recordings Act extended compulsory licenses to digitally broadcast media. Notwithstanding the complications intrinsic to this provision, the Act stopped short of creating a compulsory license for interactive and on demand services. Streaming services like Spotify, Rdio and now Google Play All-Access are transforming music distribution. Yet these companies are subject to a rate-hike cliff, whereby labels and copyright owners can license content to upstart distributors for relatively little compensation, only to subsequently raise these rates as distributional platforms begin to become profitable. To combat this phenomenon, a compulsory rate should be extended to interactive digital webcasters, and should be structured so as to incentivize both parties to negotiate for a fair rate, outside of the compulsory one.","PeriodicalId":36418,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2557709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The digitalization of digital media has repeatedly forced Copyright Law to address cutting edge issues of Law. The Digital Performance in Sound Recordings Act extended compulsory licenses to digitally broadcast media. Notwithstanding the complications intrinsic to this provision, the Act stopped short of creating a compulsory license for interactive and on demand services. Streaming services like Spotify, Rdio and now Google Play All-Access are transforming music distribution. Yet these companies are subject to a rate-hike cliff, whereby labels and copyright owners can license content to upstart distributors for relatively little compensation, only to subsequently raise these rates as distributional platforms begin to become profitable. To combat this phenomenon, a compulsory rate should be extended to interactive digital webcasters, and should be structured so as to incentivize both parties to negotiate for a fair rate, outside of the compulsory one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spotify悖论:为流媒体点播音乐服务创建强制许可计划如何拯救音乐产业
数字媒体的数字化一再迫使著作权法解决法律的前沿问题。《数字录音表演法案》将强制许可扩展到数字广播媒体。尽管这一规定具有内在的复杂性,但该法没有为互动式和按需服务规定强制许可。流媒体服务如Spotify、Rdio和现在的Google Play All-Access正在改变音乐分销。然而,这些公司面临着涨价悬崖,唱片公司和版权所有者可以以相对较低的报酬将内容授权给新兴的分销商,但随着分销平台开始盈利,这些公司随后会提高这些费率。为了解决这一现象,应将强制性费率扩展到交互式数字网络广播公司,并应在结构上激励双方在强制性费率之外谈判一个公平的费率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and evolving issues under US copyright and patent law EULAs: Flexible tools of governance or instruments of authoritarianism? Are streaming rights the new broadcasting rights of the 21st century? A comparative review on the specific case of esport competitions Mr. Feige, I don’t feel so good … Copyright ownership, creators’ rights, and the Marvel Cinematic Universe Dark clouds gather – The development of cloud gaming, and competition agencies’ efforts to enable it on mobile app stores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1