Systematic literature review of the barriers and facilitators of frugal innovation for surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Innovations Pub Date : 2023-08-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjinnov-2022-001066
Cyan Brittany Brown, L. McDermott
{"title":"Systematic literature review of the barriers and facilitators of frugal innovation for surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries","authors":"Cyan Brittany Brown, L. McDermott","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2022-001066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Globally, 5 billion people lack access to safe surgery and annually, only 6% of surgeries occur in low-income countries. Surgical frugal innovations can reduce cost and optimise the function for the context; however, there is limited evidence about what enables success. Design A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to understand the barriers and facilitators of frugal innovation for surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Data sources Web of Science, PubMed, Embase at Ovid, Google Scholar and EThOs were searched. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Inclusion criteria were original research in English containing a frugal surgical innovation. Research must be focused on LMICs. Studies were excluded if the content was not focused on LMICs or did not pertain to barriers and facilitators. 26 studies from 2006 to 2021 were included. The GRADE tool was used to assess overall review quality. Results Results were analysed using the modified consolidated framework for implementation research. The lack of formal evidence regarding frugal innovation in LMICs was the most reported barrier. The adaptability of frugal innovations to the context was the most reported facilitator. The limitations of this study were that most frugal innovations are not included in formal literature and that only English studies were included. Conclusion Frugal surgical innovations that are highly adaptable to the local context hold significant potential to scale and positively affect healthcare access and outcomes. Furthermore, supporting formal research about frugal innovations is important when aiming to innovate for health equity.","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":"42 1","pages":"226 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2022-001066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective Globally, 5 billion people lack access to safe surgery and annually, only 6% of surgeries occur in low-income countries. Surgical frugal innovations can reduce cost and optimise the function for the context; however, there is limited evidence about what enables success. Design A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to understand the barriers and facilitators of frugal innovation for surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Data sources Web of Science, PubMed, Embase at Ovid, Google Scholar and EThOs were searched. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Inclusion criteria were original research in English containing a frugal surgical innovation. Research must be focused on LMICs. Studies were excluded if the content was not focused on LMICs or did not pertain to barriers and facilitators. 26 studies from 2006 to 2021 were included. The GRADE tool was used to assess overall review quality. Results Results were analysed using the modified consolidated framework for implementation research. The lack of formal evidence regarding frugal innovation in LMICs was the most reported barrier. The adaptability of frugal innovations to the context was the most reported facilitator. The limitations of this study were that most frugal innovations are not included in formal literature and that only English studies were included. Conclusion Frugal surgical innovations that are highly adaptable to the local context hold significant potential to scale and positively affect healthcare access and outcomes. Furthermore, supporting formal research about frugal innovations is important when aiming to innovate for health equity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统文献综述的障碍和促进节俭创新的外科护理在低收入和中等收入国家
全球有50亿人无法获得安全手术,每年只有6%的手术发生在低收入国家。手术节约型创新可以降低成本,优化功能;然而,关于成功的因素的证据有限。设计进行了系统的文献综述(SLR),以了解中低收入国家(LMICs)外科护理节俭创新的障碍和促进因素。检索了Web of Science、PubMed、Embase at Ovid、Google Scholar和EThOs等数据源。入选标准为英文原创研究,包含一项节俭的外科创新。研究必须集中在中低收入国家。如果研究的内容不侧重于中低收入国家或不涉及障碍和促进因素,则排除研究。纳入了2006年至2021年的26项研究。GRADE工具用于评估总体评价质量。结果采用改进的综合框架对结果进行分析,进行实施研究。缺乏关于中低收入国家节俭创新的正式证据是报道最多的障碍。节约型创新对环境的适应性是被报道最多的促进因素。本研究的局限性在于大多数节约型创新没有被包括在正式文献中,而且只包括了英语研究。结论高度适应当地环境的节俭外科创新具有巨大的规模潜力,并对医疗服务的可及性和结果产生积极影响。此外,支持关于节约型创新的正式研究在旨在为卫生公平而创新时很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Innovations
BMJ Innovations Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.
期刊最新文献
Biomechanical analysis of delivering chest compressions in virtual reality simulation: preliminary insights into fidelity and validity of virtual reality as a means of delivering life support training iCount: a human-factors engineered solution to vaginal swab retention – an early-stage innovation report Spreading and scaling innovation and improvement: understanding why the differences matter Role of twinnings in scaling up innovative solutions across Europe Wings of Healing: regulatory landscape, case studies and the Indian prologue of drones in healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1