İnci Hansu, Kemal Hansu, Zekeriya Balık, Halis Özdemir, N. Yücel
{"title":"Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester: is it possible?","authors":"İnci Hansu, Kemal Hansu, Zekeriya Balık, Halis Özdemir, N. Yücel","doi":"10.2399/prn.22.0302004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the first trimester markers that may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to evaluate whether those markers might be used for prediction of gestational diabetes or not. Methods: Pregnant women between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation applying to the university hospital between August 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Body mass index calculation and blood tests including complete blood count, TSH, T3, T4, HbA1c, uric acid, CRP, procalcitonin, PAPP-A and b-hCG levels were done during assessment followed by 50 grams of glucose challenge test between the 24 and 28 weeks of gestation for each woman. Patients with positive results were further evaluated with a 3-hour, 100-g OGTT. According to the diagnostic test results, the relationship between biochemical markers during the first trimester, BMI and GDM was statistically analyzed. Results: A hundred and eighty-two pregnant women participated in the study. Fifty-four women had positive glucose challenge test (GCT) results while 128 women had negative results. Pregnant women with positive GCT results underwent 3-hour, 100-g OGTT and, 24 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM, while 158 pregnant women were considered healthy according to the results. There was no statistically significant difference between GDM and non-GDM groups in terms of age, height, TSH, T3, T4, b-hCG-mom, PAPP-A, PAPP-A-mom, uric acid and procalcitonin (p>0.05). The mean body weight, body mass index and HbA1c levels were higher and b-hCG levels were lower in the GDM group compared to the non-GDM group, and these findings were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of first trimester markers in GDM prediction seems to have no significance. There is a need for extensive, randomized studies with universal criteria.","PeriodicalId":46449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Education","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/prn.22.0302004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the first trimester markers that may be associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to evaluate whether those markers might be used for prediction of gestational diabetes or not. Methods: Pregnant women between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation applying to the university hospital between August 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Body mass index calculation and blood tests including complete blood count, TSH, T3, T4, HbA1c, uric acid, CRP, procalcitonin, PAPP-A and b-hCG levels were done during assessment followed by 50 grams of glucose challenge test between the 24 and 28 weeks of gestation for each woman. Patients with positive results were further evaluated with a 3-hour, 100-g OGTT. According to the diagnostic test results, the relationship between biochemical markers during the first trimester, BMI and GDM was statistically analyzed. Results: A hundred and eighty-two pregnant women participated in the study. Fifty-four women had positive glucose challenge test (GCT) results while 128 women had negative results. Pregnant women with positive GCT results underwent 3-hour, 100-g OGTT and, 24 pregnant women were diagnosed with GDM, while 158 pregnant women were considered healthy according to the results. There was no statistically significant difference between GDM and non-GDM groups in terms of age, height, TSH, T3, T4, b-hCG-mom, PAPP-A, PAPP-A-mom, uric acid and procalcitonin (p>0.05). The mean body weight, body mass index and HbA1c levels were higher and b-hCG levels were lower in the GDM group compared to the non-GDM group, and these findings were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of first trimester markers in GDM prediction seems to have no significance. There is a need for extensive, randomized studies with universal criteria.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Education (JPE) is the leading peer-reviewed journal specifically for childbirth educators. Through evidence-based articles, the JPE advances the knowledge of aspiring and seasoned educators in any setting-independent or private practice, community, hospital, nursing or midwifery school-and informs educators and other health care professionals on research that will improve their practice and their efforts to support natural, safe, and healthy birth. The JPE also publishes features that provide practical resources and advice health care professionals can use to enhance the quality and effectiveness of their care or teaching to prepare expectant parents for birth. The journal''s content focuses on pregnancy, childbirth, the postpartum period, breastfeeding, neonatal care, early parenting, and young family development. In addition to childbirth educators, the JPE''s readers include nurses, midwives, physicians, and other professionals involved with perinatal education and maternal-child health care.