Words and diagrams about Rosenstock-Huessy’s cross of reality

IF 0.7 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Culture Theory and Critique Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14735784.2022.2161590
M. Zwick
{"title":"Words and diagrams about Rosenstock-Huessy’s cross of reality","authors":"M. Zwick","doi":"10.1080/14735784.2022.2161590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper is a systems theoretic examination of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy’s ‘cross of reality’, a structure that fuses a spatial dyad of inner-outer and a temporal dyad of past-future into a space–time tetrad. This structure is compatible not only with the ‘human-centered’ point of view that Rosenstock-Huessy favours, but also with the ‘world-centered’ point of view inherent in science. The structure, based in his analysis of speech, is applied by him to a wide variety of individual and collective human phenomena, including language, religion, and social critique. To appropriate terminology used by physicists, the cross of reality could be viewed as Rosenstock-Huessy’s ‘theory of everything’, a framework for the social sciences and humanities that can be used to model entities, events and processes. The cross diagrams some basic notions of systems theory. Rosenstock-Huessy’s critique of science is partially shared by systems thought, and the goal he posited for sociology of understanding and alleviating human suffering can gain support from systems ideas and methods.","PeriodicalId":43943,"journal":{"name":"Culture Theory and Critique","volume":"33 1","pages":"61 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Theory and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2022.2161590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper is a systems theoretic examination of Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy’s ‘cross of reality’, a structure that fuses a spatial dyad of inner-outer and a temporal dyad of past-future into a space–time tetrad. This structure is compatible not only with the ‘human-centered’ point of view that Rosenstock-Huessy favours, but also with the ‘world-centered’ point of view inherent in science. The structure, based in his analysis of speech, is applied by him to a wide variety of individual and collective human phenomena, including language, religion, and social critique. To appropriate terminology used by physicists, the cross of reality could be viewed as Rosenstock-Huessy’s ‘theory of everything’, a framework for the social sciences and humanities that can be used to model entities, events and processes. The cross diagrams some basic notions of systems theory. Rosenstock-Huessy’s critique of science is partially shared by systems thought, and the goal he posited for sociology of understanding and alleviating human suffering can gain support from systems ideas and methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于Rosenstock-Huessy的现实交叉的文字和图表
本文从系统理论的角度考察了欧根·罗森斯托克-赫西的“现实的交叉”结构,该结构将内外的空间二元体和过去-未来的时间二元体融合为一个时空四分体。这种结构不仅与Rosenstock-Huessy支持的“以人为中心”的观点相容,而且与科学固有的“以世界为中心”的观点相容。这种结构基于他对言语的分析,被他广泛应用于个人和集体的人类现象,包括语言、宗教和社会批判。用物理学家恰当的术语来说,现实的交叉可以被视为罗森斯托克-赫西的“万物理论”,这是一个社会科学和人文科学的框架,可以用来模拟实体、事件和过程。交叉图是系统理论的一些基本概念。罗森斯托克-赫西对科学的批判部分得到了系统思想的认同,他为社会学设定的理解和减轻人类痛苦的目标可以从系统思想和方法中获得支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Culture Theory and Critique
Culture Theory and Critique HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Reading for the future: İstanbul Ansiklopedisi, a collection without origin ‘Military’ miracle drugs and the ‘pharmaceuticalisation’ of everyday life from below in the Cold War USSR The afterlife of uprisings in the work of Georges Didi-Huberman and João Moreira Salles’ No Intenso Agora. Of sacred animals: the limits of animal rights activism and political veganism in India Aesthetic (dis)pleasure in a war zone: complexities of US-military patronage of an ‘enemy’ Iraqi artist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1