The Results of Cochlear Implantation in the Inner Ear Malformations.

Elvan Onan, Ulku Tuncer, Ozgur Surmelioglu, Muhammed Dagkiran, Suleyman Ozdemir, Ozgur Tarkan, Mustafa Mete Kiroglu
{"title":"The Results of Cochlear Implantation in the Inner Ear Malformations.","authors":"Elvan Onan, Ulku Tuncer, Ozgur Surmelioglu, Muhammed Dagkiran, Suleyman Ozdemir, Ozgur Tarkan, Mustafa Mete Kiroglu","doi":"10.5152/iao.2022.20134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cochlear implants are arguably the most successful neural prosthesis today. Cochlear implantation has several difficulties in patients with internal ear anomalies. This study was performed to analyze intraoperative, postoperative findings, and auditory performance of 55 patients who had inner ear malformations and were treated with cochlear implants at Otorhinolaryngology Department of Çukurova University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Auditory performances were analyzed in 30 of 55 patients. Patients with cochlear anomalies were evaluated as group I, patients with vestibular malformation as group II, and patients with the normal bone labyrinth as group III. Listening progress profiles and meaningful auditory integration scale tests were used to determine performances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison between the listening progress profiles test performance of the groups at 12th and 18th month of group I was significantly lower than other groups (P < .05) and reached at the same level after the 24th month. Comparison between the meaningful auditory integration scale test performance of groups at 24th and 36th month of group I was significantly lower than other groups (P < .05). Perilymph gusher was observed in 3 patients who had incomplete partition I malformation. Oozing was observed in 50% of incomplete partition II patients. Facial nerve traced a variant course in 4 of 55 patients and 6 patients had postoperative meningitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initially patients with inner ear anomalies showed that the level of language development was worse than patients with normal bone anatomy. However, it was shown that they both reached the same point as a result. Facial nerve anomaly and meningitis risk is higher in patients with inner ear malformations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"1 1","pages":"203-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682797/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.20134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cochlear implants are arguably the most successful neural prosthesis today. Cochlear implantation has several difficulties in patients with internal ear anomalies. This study was performed to analyze intraoperative, postoperative findings, and auditory performance of 55 patients who had inner ear malformations and were treated with cochlear implants at Otorhinolaryngology Department of Çukurova University Hospital.

Methods: Auditory performances were analyzed in 30 of 55 patients. Patients with cochlear anomalies were evaluated as group I, patients with vestibular malformation as group II, and patients with the normal bone labyrinth as group III. Listening progress profiles and meaningful auditory integration scale tests were used to determine performances.

Results: Comparison between the listening progress profiles test performance of the groups at 12th and 18th month of group I was significantly lower than other groups (P < .05) and reached at the same level after the 24th month. Comparison between the meaningful auditory integration scale test performance of groups at 24th and 36th month of group I was significantly lower than other groups (P < .05). Perilymph gusher was observed in 3 patients who had incomplete partition I malformation. Oozing was observed in 50% of incomplete partition II patients. Facial nerve traced a variant course in 4 of 55 patients and 6 patients had postoperative meningitis.

Conclusion: Initially patients with inner ear anomalies showed that the level of language development was worse than patients with normal bone anatomy. However, it was shown that they both reached the same point as a result. Facial nerve anomaly and meningitis risk is higher in patients with inner ear malformations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内耳畸形人工耳蜗植入术的效果。
背景:人工耳蜗可以说是当今最成功的神经义肢。内耳畸形患者的人工耳蜗植入术有几个困难。本研究分析了在Çukurova大学医院耳鼻喉科接受人工耳蜗植入治疗的55例内耳畸形患者的术中、术后表现和听觉表现。方法分析55例患者中30例的听觉表现。耳蜗异常组为ⅰ组,前庭畸形组为ⅱ组,骨迷路正常组为ⅲ组。听力进步概况和有意义的听觉整合量表测试来确定表现。结果1组患儿在第12、18个月的听力进步曲线测试成绩显著低于其他组(P < 0.05),第24个月后达到相同水平。第1组患者第24、36个月的意义听觉整合量表测试成绩比较,组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。3例伴有不完全I隔畸形的患者出现淋巴腺外喷涌。50%的II型不完全分区患者出现渗液。55例患者中4例面神经病变,6例术后发生脑膜炎。结论内耳畸形患者早期语言发育水平较骨解剖正常患者差。然而,结果表明,它们都达到了同一点。内耳畸形患者面神经异常和脑膜炎的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An International Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Ménière's Disease Amongst Otolaryngology Consultants. Associations of Blood Lipids with the Risk and Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Meta-analysis. Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence. Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence. Constant Dizziness Versus Episodic Vertigo in Ménière's Disease: Health-Related Quality of Life, Cognitive Dissonance, and Postural Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1