Die konteks vir die keuse van geriefsvoedsel van bepaalde beroepsvroue

IF 1.5 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences Pub Date : 2010-03-15 DOI:10.4314/JFECS.V32I1.52857
M. Kok, P. Botha
{"title":"Die konteks vir die keuse van geriefsvoedsel van bepaalde beroepsvroue","authors":"M. Kok, P. Botha","doi":"10.4314/JFECS.V32I1.52857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to understand and \ndescribe the context in which career women \nchoose, purchase and use convenience food (CF). \nA person is rarely isolated from or unaffected by \nfactors in his/her context/environment. The context \nalso helps to give meaning to the behaviour of people. \nThe choice of an ecological framework as an \norganising tool for this study is therefore selfevident. \nThe two most relevant environments or contexts in which a household functions are the socalled proximal or close, and distal or societal environments of the ecological framework. The close environment includes the social and physical subsystems. For this research, the social subsystem refers to the people for whom the food is intended, the type of meal and whether the meal occurs during the week or weekend. This may influence the \ntype of food chosen. The physical subsystem refers \nin this case to the type of dwelling, e.g. whether \nit is a single freestanding unit or a townhouse (in \nwhich space is mostly limited). The societal environment \nrefers inter alia to the economic and sociocultural \nsubsystems. Understanding the interaction \npatterns among and within the various subsystems \nof these environments can contribute to an understanding \nof the complexity of choosing, buying and using CF. \nA qualitative research methodology and a grounded \ntheory approach were used in the study. A theoretical \nsample was drawn to get to know more about \nthe object of study. With this sampling technique, \nthe researcher, on the one hand minimises differences, \nand on the other hand, maximises differences \nbetween participants. In the end, eight career \nwomen were chosen as participants, who met \nthe criteria for inclusion in the study sample \n(minimising differences). The criteria were (a) a \nprofessional career and (b) a working week of at \nleast 40 hours per week. Differences between the \ncases were maximised by including . participants of two age categories, namely eGeneration Xf and eBaby Boomersf; . single and married homemakers; \n. some participants without children and some with children of different ages. Basic individual interviewing and a projective technique were used to gather qualitative data. Cash slips, field notes and observations in the supermarket were used as additional sources of data and for triangulation purposes. Data analysis included open, axial and selective coding. \nConsidering the closer environment, the most salient \nfindings were the following: Social aspects are important when choosing CF. The preferences and likes of their spouses, children and guests seem to be considered when choosing CF. CF seems to be an acceptable choice for some of the married career women especially during the week when they are pressed for time, whereas single \ncareer women seem to use CF as a standard \npractice. For guests, food is often prepared from \nscratch. Only when guests arrive unexpectedly, CF \nwould be considered. During weekends, a relaxed \npattern regarding meal preparation seems to be the \nnorm. Those who rely on CF during the week continue \nto do so during the weekends. Those who sometimes opt for CF during the week, tend to spend a little more time preparing eeasyf foods, such as salads. The most salient findings within the distal environment were the following: The spendable income of the household is a product of the economy. The more price sensitive eBaby \nBoomersf view CF as too expensive, whereas the \nGeneration X sees it as value for money and time \nsaved, which are both scarce resources for this generation. The single participants living in townhouses \nemploy part-time domestic workers, whereas the \nmarried participants living in freestanding dwellings \nemploy full-time domestic workers. Full-time domestic \nworkers assist in or do all the food preparation as \nwell as various household chores. The accessible \nretail environment seems also to play a significant \nrole in the choice of convenience food. Factors such \nas a convenient location, a clean, well-organised and \nfriendly atmosphere and a one-stop shopping experience, \nfavour the buying of CF. Finally, an indirect \nsocio-cultural influence was evident in the choice of \nCF, such as partially prepared meat products suitable \nfor a 'braai', a typical South African tradition.","PeriodicalId":53194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences","volume":"31 7 1","pages":"70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JFECS.V32I1.52857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand and describe the context in which career women choose, purchase and use convenience food (CF). A person is rarely isolated from or unaffected by factors in his/her context/environment. The context also helps to give meaning to the behaviour of people. The choice of an ecological framework as an organising tool for this study is therefore selfevident. The two most relevant environments or contexts in which a household functions are the socalled proximal or close, and distal or societal environments of the ecological framework. The close environment includes the social and physical subsystems. For this research, the social subsystem refers to the people for whom the food is intended, the type of meal and whether the meal occurs during the week or weekend. This may influence the type of food chosen. The physical subsystem refers in this case to the type of dwelling, e.g. whether it is a single freestanding unit or a townhouse (in which space is mostly limited). The societal environment refers inter alia to the economic and sociocultural subsystems. Understanding the interaction patterns among and within the various subsystems of these environments can contribute to an understanding of the complexity of choosing, buying and using CF. A qualitative research methodology and a grounded theory approach were used in the study. A theoretical sample was drawn to get to know more about the object of study. With this sampling technique, the researcher, on the one hand minimises differences, and on the other hand, maximises differences between participants. In the end, eight career women were chosen as participants, who met the criteria for inclusion in the study sample (minimising differences). The criteria were (a) a professional career and (b) a working week of at least 40 hours per week. Differences between the cases were maximised by including . participants of two age categories, namely eGeneration Xf and eBaby Boomersf; . single and married homemakers; . some participants without children and some with children of different ages. Basic individual interviewing and a projective technique were used to gather qualitative data. Cash slips, field notes and observations in the supermarket were used as additional sources of data and for triangulation purposes. Data analysis included open, axial and selective coding. Considering the closer environment, the most salient findings were the following: Social aspects are important when choosing CF. The preferences and likes of their spouses, children and guests seem to be considered when choosing CF. CF seems to be an acceptable choice for some of the married career women especially during the week when they are pressed for time, whereas single career women seem to use CF as a standard practice. For guests, food is often prepared from scratch. Only when guests arrive unexpectedly, CF would be considered. During weekends, a relaxed pattern regarding meal preparation seems to be the norm. Those who rely on CF during the week continue to do so during the weekends. Those who sometimes opt for CF during the week, tend to spend a little more time preparing eeasyf foods, such as salads. The most salient findings within the distal environment were the following: The spendable income of the household is a product of the economy. The more price sensitive eBaby Boomersf view CF as too expensive, whereas the Generation X sees it as value for money and time saved, which are both scarce resources for this generation. The single participants living in townhouses employ part-time domestic workers, whereas the married participants living in freestanding dwellings employ full-time domestic workers. Full-time domestic workers assist in or do all the food preparation as well as various household chores. The accessible retail environment seems also to play a significant role in the choice of convenience food. Factors such as a convenient location, a clean, well-organised and friendly atmosphere and a one-stop shopping experience, favour the buying of CF. Finally, an indirect socio-cultural influence was evident in the choice of CF, such as partially prepared meat products suitable for a 'braai', a typical South African tradition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的是了解和描述职业女性选择,购买和使用方便食品(CF)的背景。一个人很少与他/她的背景/环境中的因素隔离或不受其影响。语境也有助于赋予人们行为的意义。因此,选择生态框架作为本研究的组织工具是不言而喻的。家庭功能的两个最相关的环境或背景是所谓的生态框架的近端或近端环境和远端或社会环境。封闭环境包括社会子系统和物理子系统。在这项研究中,社会子系统指的是食物的目标人群、食物的类型以及是在工作日还是周末用餐。这可能会影响所选择的食物类型。在这种情况下,物理子系统指的是住宅类型,例如,它是一个独立的单元还是一个联排别墅(其中空间大多是有限的)。社会环境除其他外指经济和社会文化子系统。了解这些环境的各个子系统之间和内部的交互模式有助于理解选择、购买和使用CF的复杂性。研究中使用了定性研究方法和扎根理论方法。为了更深入地了解研究对象,我们抽取了一个理论样本。通过这种抽样技术,研究人员一方面使差异最小化,另一方面使参与者之间的差异最大化。最后,8名职业女性被选为参与者,她们符合纳入研究样本的标准(差异最小化)。标准是(a)职业生涯和(b)每周至少工作40小时。案例之间的差异通过包括。两个年龄段的参与者,即“X一代”和“婴儿潮一代”;。单身及已婚家庭主妇;。有些参与者没有孩子,有些参与者有不同年龄的孩子。基本的个人访谈和投影技术用于收集定性数据。现金单、实地记录和在超市的观察被用作额外的数据来源和三角测量目的。数据分析包括开放编码、轴向编码和选择性编码。考虑到更近的环境,最突出的发现是:选择CF时,社会方面很重要。选择CF时,他们的配偶,孩子和客人的偏好和喜好似乎被考虑在内。CF似乎是一些已婚职业女性可以接受的选择,特别是在她们时间紧迫的一周中,而单身职业女性似乎将CF作为一种标准做法。对于客人来说,食物通常是从头开始准备的。只有客人意外到达时才会考虑CF。在周末,一种放松的准备饭菜的模式似乎是常态。那些在工作日依赖CF的人在周末继续这样做。那些有时在工作日选择CF的人,往往会花更多的时间准备“容易”的食物,比如沙拉。在远端环境中最突出的发现如下:家庭的可支配收入是经济的产物。对价格更敏感的“婴儿潮一代”认为CF太贵了,而X一代则认为它物有所值,而且节省了时间,这对这一代人来说都是稀缺资源。居住在联排别墅的单身参与者雇佣兼职家庭佣工,而居住在独立住宅的已婚参与者雇佣全职家庭佣工。全职家庭佣工协助或做所有的食物准备以及各种家务。便利的零售环境似乎也在方便食品的选择中发挥了重要作用。便利的地理位置、干净、有序和友好的氛围以及一站式购物体验等因素都有利于购买CF。最后,在CF的选择中,间接的社会文化影响是显而易见的,例如部分准备好的肉类产品适合“braai”,这是典型的南非传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences
Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumption patterns of street food consumers in Cape Town Parental influence on consumer and purchase behaviour of Generation Y The efficacy of anolyte as an environmentally friendly disinfectant on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus contaminated cotton, polyestercotton and polyester Pedagogical guidance for South African consumer studies education The standing of the curriculum for Consumer Studies as school subject in the South African context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1