{"title":"Die konteks vir die keuse van geriefsvoedsel van bepaalde beroepsvroue","authors":"M. Kok, P. Botha","doi":"10.4314/JFECS.V32I1.52857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to understand and \ndescribe the context in which career women \nchoose, purchase and use convenience food (CF). \nA person is rarely isolated from or unaffected by \nfactors in his/her context/environment. The context \nalso helps to give meaning to the behaviour of people. \nThe choice of an ecological framework as an \norganising tool for this study is therefore selfevident. \nThe two most relevant environments or contexts in which a household functions are the socalled proximal or close, and distal or societal environments of the ecological framework. The close environment includes the social and physical subsystems. For this research, the social subsystem refers to the people for whom the food is intended, the type of meal and whether the meal occurs during the week or weekend. This may influence the \ntype of food chosen. The physical subsystem refers \nin this case to the type of dwelling, e.g. whether \nit is a single freestanding unit or a townhouse (in \nwhich space is mostly limited). The societal environment \nrefers inter alia to the economic and sociocultural \nsubsystems. Understanding the interaction \npatterns among and within the various subsystems \nof these environments can contribute to an understanding \nof the complexity of choosing, buying and using CF. \nA qualitative research methodology and a grounded \ntheory approach were used in the study. A theoretical \nsample was drawn to get to know more about \nthe object of study. With this sampling technique, \nthe researcher, on the one hand minimises differences, \nand on the other hand, maximises differences \nbetween participants. In the end, eight career \nwomen were chosen as participants, who met \nthe criteria for inclusion in the study sample \n(minimising differences). The criteria were (a) a \nprofessional career and (b) a working week of at \nleast 40 hours per week. Differences between the \ncases were maximised by including . participants of two age categories, namely eGeneration Xf and eBaby Boomersf; . single and married homemakers; \n. some participants without children and some with children of different ages. Basic individual interviewing and a projective technique were used to gather qualitative data. Cash slips, field notes and observations in the supermarket were used as additional sources of data and for triangulation purposes. Data analysis included open, axial and selective coding. \nConsidering the closer environment, the most salient \nfindings were the following: Social aspects are important when choosing CF. The preferences and likes of their spouses, children and guests seem to be considered when choosing CF. CF seems to be an acceptable choice for some of the married career women especially during the week when they are pressed for time, whereas single \ncareer women seem to use CF as a standard \npractice. For guests, food is often prepared from \nscratch. Only when guests arrive unexpectedly, CF \nwould be considered. During weekends, a relaxed \npattern regarding meal preparation seems to be the \nnorm. Those who rely on CF during the week continue \nto do so during the weekends. Those who sometimes opt for CF during the week, tend to spend a little more time preparing eeasyf foods, such as salads. The most salient findings within the distal environment were the following: The spendable income of the household is a product of the economy. The more price sensitive eBaby \nBoomersf view CF as too expensive, whereas the \nGeneration X sees it as value for money and time \nsaved, which are both scarce resources for this generation. The single participants living in townhouses \nemploy part-time domestic workers, whereas the \nmarried participants living in freestanding dwellings \nemploy full-time domestic workers. Full-time domestic \nworkers assist in or do all the food preparation as \nwell as various household chores. The accessible \nretail environment seems also to play a significant \nrole in the choice of convenience food. Factors such \nas a convenient location, a clean, well-organised and \nfriendly atmosphere and a one-stop shopping experience, \nfavour the buying of CF. Finally, an indirect \nsocio-cultural influence was evident in the choice of \nCF, such as partially prepared meat products suitable \nfor a 'braai', a typical South African tradition.","PeriodicalId":53194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences","volume":"31 7 1","pages":"70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JFECS.V32I1.52857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to understand and
describe the context in which career women
choose, purchase and use convenience food (CF).
A person is rarely isolated from or unaffected by
factors in his/her context/environment. The context
also helps to give meaning to the behaviour of people.
The choice of an ecological framework as an
organising tool for this study is therefore selfevident.
The two most relevant environments or contexts in which a household functions are the socalled proximal or close, and distal or societal environments of the ecological framework. The close environment includes the social and physical subsystems. For this research, the social subsystem refers to the people for whom the food is intended, the type of meal and whether the meal occurs during the week or weekend. This may influence the
type of food chosen. The physical subsystem refers
in this case to the type of dwelling, e.g. whether
it is a single freestanding unit or a townhouse (in
which space is mostly limited). The societal environment
refers inter alia to the economic and sociocultural
subsystems. Understanding the interaction
patterns among and within the various subsystems
of these environments can contribute to an understanding
of the complexity of choosing, buying and using CF.
A qualitative research methodology and a grounded
theory approach were used in the study. A theoretical
sample was drawn to get to know more about
the object of study. With this sampling technique,
the researcher, on the one hand minimises differences,
and on the other hand, maximises differences
between participants. In the end, eight career
women were chosen as participants, who met
the criteria for inclusion in the study sample
(minimising differences). The criteria were (a) a
professional career and (b) a working week of at
least 40 hours per week. Differences between the
cases were maximised by including . participants of two age categories, namely eGeneration Xf and eBaby Boomersf; . single and married homemakers;
. some participants without children and some with children of different ages. Basic individual interviewing and a projective technique were used to gather qualitative data. Cash slips, field notes and observations in the supermarket were used as additional sources of data and for triangulation purposes. Data analysis included open, axial and selective coding.
Considering the closer environment, the most salient
findings were the following: Social aspects are important when choosing CF. The preferences and likes of their spouses, children and guests seem to be considered when choosing CF. CF seems to be an acceptable choice for some of the married career women especially during the week when they are pressed for time, whereas single
career women seem to use CF as a standard
practice. For guests, food is often prepared from
scratch. Only when guests arrive unexpectedly, CF
would be considered. During weekends, a relaxed
pattern regarding meal preparation seems to be the
norm. Those who rely on CF during the week continue
to do so during the weekends. Those who sometimes opt for CF during the week, tend to spend a little more time preparing eeasyf foods, such as salads. The most salient findings within the distal environment were the following: The spendable income of the household is a product of the economy. The more price sensitive eBaby
Boomersf view CF as too expensive, whereas the
Generation X sees it as value for money and time
saved, which are both scarce resources for this generation. The single participants living in townhouses
employ part-time domestic workers, whereas the
married participants living in freestanding dwellings
employ full-time domestic workers. Full-time domestic
workers assist in or do all the food preparation as
well as various household chores. The accessible
retail environment seems also to play a significant
role in the choice of convenience food. Factors such
as a convenient location, a clean, well-organised and
friendly atmosphere and a one-stop shopping experience,
favour the buying of CF. Finally, an indirect
socio-cultural influence was evident in the choice of
CF, such as partially prepared meat products suitable
for a 'braai', a typical South African tradition.