Transcending the colonial worldview to establish a research paradigm through an African lens: Analysis of research modules in archives

M. Ngoepe, Lorette Jacobs, Elizabeth Geyer
{"title":"Transcending the colonial worldview to establish a research paradigm through an African lens: Analysis of research modules in archives","authors":"M. Ngoepe, Lorette Jacobs, Elizabeth Geyer","doi":"10.3233/efi-220006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the emergence of postcolonialism, there has been a call for epistemic decolonisation in the African scientific community. Paradigmatic backgrounds are key to defining belief systems that guide research investigations – not only in choice of approach, but also in the contextualisation and execution of research designs. Researchers’ limited understanding of these philosophical backgrounds and the way in which they can transcend towards decolonised research, inhibits researchers’ exploration of the deeper meaning of and commitment to research in the postcolonial context. This paper aims at contextualising the decolonisation of Eurocentric paradigms towards the transcendence of a new worldview that is relevant and unique to the African context. This is done through the analysis of two research methodology modules in Archival Science at an open distance e-learning institution. The genesis of postcolonial research, which lies in replacing dominant “truths” with marginalised “truths”, aims at rearticulating power, change and knowledge through a multiplicity of epistemologies, ontologies, and axiologies. By applying a postcolonial research paradigm, research can be used as a way of expanding knowledge and creating new knowledge as a starting point of epistemic decolonisation. This article contributes to the dismantling of the old order of research paradigms by exploring the transcendence of existing research paradigms and suggesting a research paradigm that provides a lens through which the postcolonial African scholar can conduct the search for truth in the field of Archival Science. However, it should be noted that, even in critical emancipation, there will still be elitism.","PeriodicalId":84661,"journal":{"name":"Environmental education and information","volume":"104 1","pages":"213-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental education and information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-220006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the emergence of postcolonialism, there has been a call for epistemic decolonisation in the African scientific community. Paradigmatic backgrounds are key to defining belief systems that guide research investigations – not only in choice of approach, but also in the contextualisation and execution of research designs. Researchers’ limited understanding of these philosophical backgrounds and the way in which they can transcend towards decolonised research, inhibits researchers’ exploration of the deeper meaning of and commitment to research in the postcolonial context. This paper aims at contextualising the decolonisation of Eurocentric paradigms towards the transcendence of a new worldview that is relevant and unique to the African context. This is done through the analysis of two research methodology modules in Archival Science at an open distance e-learning institution. The genesis of postcolonial research, which lies in replacing dominant “truths” with marginalised “truths”, aims at rearticulating power, change and knowledge through a multiplicity of epistemologies, ontologies, and axiologies. By applying a postcolonial research paradigm, research can be used as a way of expanding knowledge and creating new knowledge as a starting point of epistemic decolonisation. This article contributes to the dismantling of the old order of research paradigms by exploring the transcendence of existing research paradigms and suggesting a research paradigm that provides a lens through which the postcolonial African scholar can conduct the search for truth in the field of Archival Science. However, it should be noted that, even in critical emancipation, there will still be elitism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越殖民世界观,建立非洲视角下的研究范式:档案研究模块分析
自从后殖民主义出现以来,非洲科学界一直呼吁认识上的非殖民化。范式背景是定义指导研究调查的信念系统的关键——不仅在方法的选择上,而且在研究设计的语境化和执行上。研究人员对这些哲学背景的有限理解,以及他们可以超越非殖民化研究的方式,阻碍了研究人员对后殖民背景下研究的更深层次意义和承诺的探索。本文旨在将以欧洲为中心的非殖民化范式置于一种与非洲环境相关且独特的新世界观的超越背景下。这是通过对开放远程电子学习机构档案科学的两个研究方法模块的分析来完成的。后殖民研究的起源在于用边缘化的“真理”取代占主导地位的“真理”,旨在通过认识论、本体论和价值论的多样性重新阐明权力、变化和知识。通过应用后殖民研究范式,研究可以作为扩展知识和创造新知识的一种方式,作为认知非殖民化的起点。本文通过探索现有研究范式的超越,并提出一种研究范式,为后殖民时期的非洲学者在档案学领域寻求真理提供了一个视角,从而有助于打破研究范式的旧秩序。然而,应该指出的是,即使在批判的解放中,仍然会有精英主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An open educational resource for doing netnography in the digital arts and humanities An OER on digital historical research on European historical newspapers with the NewsEye platform E-spect@tor for performing arts Subject-based knowledge organisation: An OER for supporting (digital) humanities research Learning text analytics without coding? An introduction to KNIME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1