A feminist rewriting of Air India v Nergesh Meerza AIR 1981 SC 1829: proposal for a test of discrimination under Article 15(1)

Shreya Atrey, Gauri Pillai
{"title":"A feminist rewriting of Air India v Nergesh Meerza AIR 1981 SC 1829: proposal for a test of discrimination under Article 15(1)","authors":"Shreya Atrey, Gauri Pillai","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2021.1911475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Nergesh Meerza is one of the earliest and most grave failures of the Supreme Court of India in the field of discrimination law. In a single stroke, not only did the Court drive a wedge between sex and gender to protect only the former from discrimination, it also debarred indirect and intersectional discrimination from the purview of the Constitution. This article presents a feminist judgment in this case which dissents from the original decision of the Court. It develops a version of constitutional protection from sex discrimination which embodies gender, indirect and intersectional discrimination. Importantly, it ventures into the hitherto neglected field of non-discrimination under Articles 15(1) and 16(2), and develops a substantive test for violations. Nergesh Meerza makes clear that without such a test, judges inevitably fail to give any meaning to the non-discrimination guarantees as part of the equality code of the Constitution.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1911475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nergesh Meerza is one of the earliest and most grave failures of the Supreme Court of India in the field of discrimination law. In a single stroke, not only did the Court drive a wedge between sex and gender to protect only the former from discrimination, it also debarred indirect and intersectional discrimination from the purview of the Constitution. This article presents a feminist judgment in this case which dissents from the original decision of the Court. It develops a version of constitutional protection from sex discrimination which embodies gender, indirect and intersectional discrimination. Importantly, it ventures into the hitherto neglected field of non-discrimination under Articles 15(1) and 16(2), and develops a substantive test for violations. Nergesh Meerza makes clear that without such a test, judges inevitably fail to give any meaning to the non-discrimination guarantees as part of the equality code of the Constitution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女权主义改写印度航空诉Nergesh Meerza Air 1981 SC 1829:根据第15(1)条进行歧视测试的建议
neergesh Meerza案是印度最高法院在反歧视法领域最早也是最严重的失败之一。法院不仅在性别和社会性别之间划清界限,只保护前者不受歧视,而且还将间接和交叉歧视排除在《宪法》的管辖范围之外。本文在本案中提出了一种与最高法院原判不同的女权主义判决。提出了一种体现性别歧视、间接歧视和交叉歧视的性别歧视宪法保护。重要的是,它根据第15条第(1)款和第16条第(2)款冒险进入迄今为止被忽视的不歧视领域,并制定了对违反行为的实质性检验。neergesh Meerza明确指出,如果没有这样的检验,法官不可避免地无法赋予作为《宪法》平等法典一部分的不歧视保障任何意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1