The SCIA Questionnaire: standards for communities for children and adolescents – a tool for the evaluation of good practices

IF 0.1 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Therapeutic Communities Pub Date : 2019-03-15 DOI:10.1108/TC-01-2018-0002
C. Guarnaccia, A. Ferraro, M. Lo Cascio, S. Bruschetta, F. Giannone
{"title":"The SCIA Questionnaire: standards for communities for children and adolescents – a tool for the evaluation of good practices","authors":"C. Guarnaccia, A. Ferraro, M. Lo Cascio, S. Bruschetta, F. Giannone","doi":"10.1108/TC-01-2018-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to present the Italian validation of the standards for communities for children and adolescents (SCIA) Questionnaire, an evaluation tool of communities quality standards, based on the “Service Standards for Therapeutic Communities for Children and Young People – 2nd edition” of the Community of Communities (2009), that enables an empirical, multidimensional and complex evaluation of the therapeutic community (TC) “system”. It is a self-report that sets out and measures variables that allow to get an overview of organisational models and the possible development areas to improve the effectiveness of the protection of child and adolescents in community treatment. The validation and a preliminary analysis to develop a short version of the SCIA are presented.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe questionnaire (composed, in the extended form, by 143 items) was administered to 101 community workers, 20 males (19.8 per cent) and 81 females (81.2 per cent) aged between 24 and 61 years (M=36.20, SD=8.4). The analysis of reliability (Cronbach’s α) and a series of exploratory factor analysis allowed to eliminate redundant or less significant items.\n\n\nFindings\nThe short form of the self-report consists of 67 items, divided into seven subscales, which explore different areas of intervention in TCs. Despite the limitations due to the small sample size, the utility of this tool remains confirmed by its clinical use and the development of good operating practices.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe SCIA Questionnaire responds to the need to adopt empirical variables in the process of evaluation of the communities. The SCIA is also a useful tool for clinical evaluation, as it allows a detailed observation of residential community treatment with children and adolescents that allows to analyse and monitor the structural and organisational aspects and the quality of practices that guide the interventions.\n","PeriodicalId":43236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Communities","volume":"8 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-01-2018-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the Italian validation of the standards for communities for children and adolescents (SCIA) Questionnaire, an evaluation tool of communities quality standards, based on the “Service Standards for Therapeutic Communities for Children and Young People – 2nd edition” of the Community of Communities (2009), that enables an empirical, multidimensional and complex evaluation of the therapeutic community (TC) “system”. It is a self-report that sets out and measures variables that allow to get an overview of organisational models and the possible development areas to improve the effectiveness of the protection of child and adolescents in community treatment. The validation and a preliminary analysis to develop a short version of the SCIA are presented. Design/methodology/approach The questionnaire (composed, in the extended form, by 143 items) was administered to 101 community workers, 20 males (19.8 per cent) and 81 females (81.2 per cent) aged between 24 and 61 years (M=36.20, SD=8.4). The analysis of reliability (Cronbach’s α) and a series of exploratory factor analysis allowed to eliminate redundant or less significant items. Findings The short form of the self-report consists of 67 items, divided into seven subscales, which explore different areas of intervention in TCs. Despite the limitations due to the small sample size, the utility of this tool remains confirmed by its clinical use and the development of good operating practices. Originality/value The SCIA Questionnaire responds to the need to adopt empirical variables in the process of evaluation of the communities. The SCIA is also a useful tool for clinical evaluation, as it allows a detailed observation of residential community treatment with children and adolescents that allows to analyse and monitor the structural and organisational aspects and the quality of practices that guide the interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SCIA调查表:儿童和青少年社区标准——一个评价良好做法的工具
目的:本文的目的是基于社区社区(2009)的“儿童和青少年治疗社区服务标准-第二版”,提出意大利对儿童和青少年社区标准(SCIA)问卷的验证,该问卷是社区质量标准的评估工具,可以对治疗社区(TC)“系统”进行实证,多维和复杂的评估。这是一份自我报告,列出并衡量了各种变量,从而可以对组织模式和可能的发展领域进行概述,以提高社区治疗中保护儿童和青少年的有效性。本文提出了开发一个简短版本的SCIA的验证和初步分析。设计/方法/方法问卷(以扩展形式组成,共143项)对101名社区工作者,20名男性(19.8%)和81名女性(81.2%)进行调查,年龄在24至61岁之间(M=36.20, SD=8.4)。信度分析(Cronbach 's α)和一系列探索性因子分析允许消除冗余或不太重要的项目。调查结果自我报告的简短形式包括67个项目,分为7个子量表,探索不同领域的干预技术。尽管由于样本量小而存在局限性,但该工具的实用性仍然通过其临床使用和良好操作规范的发展得到证实。原创性/价值SCIA问卷回应了在社区评估过程中需要采用经验变量的需求。SCIA也是临床评估的有用工具,因为它允许对儿童和青少年的住院社区治疗进行详细观察,从而可以分析和监测指导干预措施的结构和组织方面以及实践的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Communities
Therapeutic Communities SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes academic papers, case studies, empirical research and opinion. The Journal is interested in publishing papers that critically creatively engage with ideas drawn from a range of discourses: the therapeutic community movement and other related professional practice, psychoanalysis, art, literature, poetry, music, architecture, culture, education, philosophy, religion and environmental studies. It will be of value to those who work in health services, social services, voluntary and charitable organizations and for all professionals involved with staff teams in therapeutic and supportive organizations.
期刊最新文献
The Northfield Experiments and the therapeutic community task A critical review of the antecedents of enabling communities Thematic group activities: accommodating the individual needs of clients undergoing therapeutic community approach in Indonesia Looking forward to 2023 Perceived effectiveness of therapeutic community model as a rehabilitation approach for Sri Lankan individuals with substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1