{"title":"Validation of Reliability Indices during Experimental Development of a Complex Technical Series System","authors":"O. Y. Tsarev, Y. Tsarev","doi":"10.23947/2687-1653-2023-23-1-26-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article studies the problem of validating the specified levels of reliability during experimental development of a complex technical series system. Such tasks arise when it is required to make a decision on testing the system as part of a larger one or on the completion of experimental development and the start of series production. The study is aimed at validating the reduction of the experimental development time. The task is to determine whether the hypothesis Но is accepted or rejected.Materials and Methods. To implement the research objective and task, a critical area described by the inequality was constructed based on the test results. The formulation of the requirements validation task was based on well-known approaches to testing statistical hypotheses. The conceptual apparatus of information theory, probability, and statistics was involved. The theoretical and applied literature on mathematical methods in reliability theory was studied. The particular tasks of the work were solved by known ways. Thus, the probability of obtaining the exact number of successful outcomes in a certain number of experiments was determined by the Bernoulli scheme. The exact confidence interval based on the binomial distribution was derived from the Clopper-Pearson relation. The theorem of A.D. Solovyov and R. A. Mirny made it possible to assess the system reliability based on the test results of its components.Results. Control rules adequate to the stage of experimental development (with insufficient data on the technical system) and the stage of series production were mathematically defined. The probability of a successful outcome when testing technical systems was represented by: – the probability of event for a system element; – confidence value; – required scope of testsIn these terms, the null and alternative hypotheses and the corresponding reliability control procedures were investigated. Two provisions were considered. The first one provided using the null confidence hypothesis о Т Н Р Р and an alternative Т Н Р Р to confirm the requirements ( , γ) Т Р for the reliability indicator of one parameter for any ( , γ) T Р . In this case, one trouble-free test was enough. The second provision considered a sequential technical system with independent elements that were tested separately from the system according to the Bernoulli scheme for one parameter. We considered the requirements for the system in the form of a set of values ( , γ) T Р and the requirements for any of its elements ( , γ) Ti Р . They coincided when the planned outcome of the tests corresponded to the cases when the ratio 1 lim : i m i N Р Р Р was fulfilled, and the null alternative hypothesis was selected from the theory of statistical hypothesis testing.Discussion and Conclusions. The experimental development strategy should be implemented in two stages: the search and validation of the reliability of the elements through a series of fail-safe tests. In this case, the planned scope of tests of each element is determined taking into account the confidence probability, the lower limit of the confidence interval, and the requirements for reliability indices of one parameter of the technical system. If the use of the null confidence hypothesis is acceptable, one fail-safe test is sufficient to confirm the requirements for the reliability index.","PeriodicalId":13758,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23947/2687-1653-2023-23-1-26-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction. The article studies the problem of validating the specified levels of reliability during experimental development of a complex technical series system. Such tasks arise when it is required to make a decision on testing the system as part of a larger one or on the completion of experimental development and the start of series production. The study is aimed at validating the reduction of the experimental development time. The task is to determine whether the hypothesis Но is accepted or rejected.Materials and Methods. To implement the research objective and task, a critical area described by the inequality was constructed based on the test results. The formulation of the requirements validation task was based on well-known approaches to testing statistical hypotheses. The conceptual apparatus of information theory, probability, and statistics was involved. The theoretical and applied literature on mathematical methods in reliability theory was studied. The particular tasks of the work were solved by known ways. Thus, the probability of obtaining the exact number of successful outcomes in a certain number of experiments was determined by the Bernoulli scheme. The exact confidence interval based on the binomial distribution was derived from the Clopper-Pearson relation. The theorem of A.D. Solovyov and R. A. Mirny made it possible to assess the system reliability based on the test results of its components.Results. Control rules adequate to the stage of experimental development (with insufficient data on the technical system) and the stage of series production were mathematically defined. The probability of a successful outcome when testing technical systems was represented by: – the probability of event for a system element; – confidence value; – required scope of testsIn these terms, the null and alternative hypotheses and the corresponding reliability control procedures were investigated. Two provisions were considered. The first one provided using the null confidence hypothesis о Т Н Р Р and an alternative Т Н Р Р to confirm the requirements ( , γ) Т Р for the reliability indicator of one parameter for any ( , γ) T Р . In this case, one trouble-free test was enough. The second provision considered a sequential technical system with independent elements that were tested separately from the system according to the Bernoulli scheme for one parameter. We considered the requirements for the system in the form of a set of values ( , γ) T Р and the requirements for any of its elements ( , γ) Ti Р . They coincided when the planned outcome of the tests corresponded to the cases when the ratio 1 lim : i m i N Р Р Р was fulfilled, and the null alternative hypothesis was selected from the theory of statistical hypothesis testing.Discussion and Conclusions. The experimental development strategy should be implemented in two stages: the search and validation of the reliability of the elements through a series of fail-safe tests. In this case, the planned scope of tests of each element is determined taking into account the confidence probability, the lower limit of the confidence interval, and the requirements for reliability indices of one parameter of the technical system. If the use of the null confidence hypothesis is acceptable, one fail-safe test is sufficient to confirm the requirements for the reliability index.
介绍。本文研究了在复杂技术系列系统的试验开发过程中,对规定的可靠性水平进行验证的问题。当需要决定是否将该系统作为更大系统的一部分进行测试或完成实验开发并开始批量生产时,就会出现此类任务。本研究旨在验证实验开发时间的缩短。任务是确定假设Но是否被接受或拒绝。材料与方法。为了实现研究目标和任务,在检验结果的基础上构建了一个由不等式描述的关键区域。需求验证任务的表述是基于众所周知的测试统计假设的方法。涉及到信息论、概率论和统计学的概念装置。研究了可靠性理论中数学方法的理论和应用文献。这项工作的特定任务是用已知的方法解决的。因此,在一定数量的实验中获得准确数量的成功结果的概率由伯努利方案确定。基于二项分布的精确置信区间由Clopper-Pearson关系导出。Solovyov和R. A. Mirny的定理使得根据系统部件的测试结果来评估系统的可靠性成为可能。对实验开发阶段(技术系统数据不足)和批量生产阶段适当的控制规则进行了数学定义。测试技术系统时成功结果的概率表示为:—系统元素的事件概率;-置信度;在这些术语中,研究了零假设和备选假设以及相应的可靠性控制程序。审议了两项规定。第一个使用零置信度假设,Т НР, Р和另一个Т НР, Р来确认(,γ) Т Р对于任何(,γ) T Р的一个参数的可靠性指标的要求。在这种情况下,一次无故障测试就足够了。第二个条款考虑了一个具有独立元素的顺序技术系统,这些元素根据一个参数的伯努利格式从系统中分离出来进行测试。我们以一组值(,γ) T Р的形式考虑系统的需求,以及它的任何元素(,γ) Ti Р的需求。当测试的计划结果与比率1 lim: im i N Р Р Р满足的情况相对应,并且从统计假设检验理论中选择零替代假设时,它们发生了重合。讨论和结论。试验开发策略应分两个阶段实施:通过一系列故障安全试验来搜索和验证元件的可靠性。在这种情况下,考虑置信概率、置信区间下限和技术系统某一参数的可靠性指标要求,确定各要素的计划试验范围。如果使用零置信度假设是可以接受的,一个故障安全测试就足以确认可靠性指标的要求。